Literature DB >> 15691740

Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae hexose carrier expression during wine fermentation: both low- and high-affinity Hxt transporters are expressed.

Marc Perez1, Kattie Luyten, Remy Michel, Christine Riou, Bruno Blondin.   

Abstract

The transport of glucose and fructose into yeast cells is a critical step in the utilization of sugars during wine fermentation. Hexose uptake can be carried out by various Hxt carriers, each possessing distinct regulatory and transport-kinetic properties capable of influencing yeast fermentation capacity. We investigated the expression pattern of the hexose transporters Hxt1 to 7 at the promoter and protein levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. The Hxt1p carrier was expressed only at the beginning of fermentation, and had no role during stationary phase. The Hxt3p carrier was the only one to be expressed throughout fermentation, displaying maximal expression at growth arrest and slowly decreasing in abundance over the course of the stationary phase. The high-affinity carriers Hxt6p and Hxt7p displayed similar expression profiles, with expression induced at entry into stationary phase and persisting throughout the phase. The expression of these two carriers occurred despite the presence of high amounts of hexoses, and the proteins were stably expressed when the cells were starved for nitrogen. The Hxt2p transporter was only transiently expressed during lag phase, which suggests a role for the protein in growth initiation. Characterization of glucose transport kinetics indicated the presence of a shift in the low-affinity component that is consistent with a predominant expression of Hxt1p during growth phase and of Hxt3p during stationary phase. In addition, a high-affinity uptake component consistent with functional expression of Hxt6p/Hxt7p was identified during stationary phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691740     DOI: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  16 in total

1.  A novel methodology independent of fermentation rate for assessment of the fructophilic character of wine yeast strains.

Authors:  T Liccioli; P J Chambers; V Jiranek
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Substrate inhibition kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in fed-batch cultures operated at constant glucose and maltose concentration levels.

Authors:  M Papagianni; Y Boonpooh; M Mattey; B Kristiansen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation.

Authors:  Carole Guillaume; Pierre Delobel; Jean-Marie Sablayrolles; Bruno Blondin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Asymmetric distribution of glucose transporter mRNA provides a growth advantage in yeast.

Authors:  Timo Stahl; Stefan Hümmer; Nikolaus Ehrenfeuchter; Nitish Mittal; Geoffrey Fucile; Anne Spang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Effect of glucose concentration on the rate of fructose consumption in native strains isolated from the fermentation of Agave duranguensis.

Authors:  M Díaz-Campillo; N Urtíz; O Soto; E Barrio; M Rutiaga; J Páez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  A Putative Bet-Hedging Strategy Buffers Budding Yeast against Environmental Instability.

Authors:  Laura E Bagamery; Quincey A Justman; Ethan C Garner; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Growth temperature exerts differential physiological and transcriptional responses in laboratory and wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Francisco J Pizarro; Michael C Jewett; Jens Nielsen; Eduardo Agosin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The Monod Model Is Insufficient To Explain Biomass Growth in Nitrogen-Limited Yeast Fermentation.

Authors:  David Henriques; Eva Balsa-Canto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Mild Pretreatments to Increase Fructose Consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Yeast Strains.

Authors:  Hatice Aybuke Karaoglan; Filiz Ozcelik; Alida Musatti; Manuela Rollini
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-19

10.  Impact of assimilable nitrogen availability in glucose uptake kinetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Margarida Palma; Sara Cordeiro Madeira; Ana Mendes-Ferreira; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.