Literature DB >> 21076285

Effect of socioemotional stress on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during advanced life support in a randomized manikin study.

Conrad Arnfinn Bjørshol1, Helge Myklebust, Kjetil Lønne Nilsen, Thomas Hoff, Cato Bjørkli, Eirik Illguth, Eldar Søreide, Kjetil Sunde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether socioemotional stress affects the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during advanced life support in a simulated manikin model.
DESIGN: A randomized crossover trial with advanced life support performed in two different conditions, with and without exposure to socioemotional stress.
SETTING: The study was conducted at the Stavanger Acute Medicine Foundation for Education and Research simulation center, Stavanger, Norway.
SUBJECTS: Paramedic teams, each consisting of two paramedics and one assistant, employed at Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
INTERVENTIONS: A total of 19 paramedic teams performed advanced life support twice in a randomized fashion, one control condition without socioemotional stress and one experimental condition with exposure to socioemotional stress. The socioemotional stress consisted of an upset friend of the simulated patient who was a physician, spoke a foreign language, was unfamiliar with current Norwegian resuscitation guidelines, supplied irrelevant clinical information, and repeatedly made doubts about the paramedics' resuscitation efforts. Aural distractions were supplied by television and cell telephone.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: chest compression depth, chest compression rate, time without chest compressions (no-flow ratio), and ventilation rate after endotracheal intubation. As a secondary outcome, the socioemotional stress impact was evaluated through the paramedics' subjective workload, frustration, and feeling of realism. There were no significant differences in chest compression depth (39 vs. 38 mm, p = .214), compression rate (113 vs. 116 min⁻¹, p = .065), no-flow ratio (0.15 vs. 0.15, p = .618), or ventilation rate (8.2 vs. 7.7 min⁻¹, p = .120) between the two conditions. There was a significant increase in the subjective workload, frustration, and feeling of realism when the paramedics were exposed to socioemotional stress.
CONCLUSION: In this advanced life support manikin study, the presence of socioemotional stress increased the subjective workload, frustration, and feeling of realism, without affecting the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21076285     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ffe100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  11 in total

1.  Manikin-based clinical simulation in chiropractic education.

Authors:  Marion McGregor; Dominic Giuliano
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2012

Review 2.  [Real-time feedback systems for improvement of resuscitation quality].

Authors:  R P Lukas; H Van Aken; P Engel; A Bohn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Provider Visual Attention Correlates With the Quality of Pediatric Resuscitation: An Observational Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Peter Gröpel; Michael Wagner; Katharina Bibl; Hannah Schwarz; Felix Eibensteiner; Angelika Berger; Francesco S Cardona
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Decay in chest compression quality due to fatigue is rare during prolonged advanced life support in a manikin model.

Authors:  Conrad A Bjørshol; Kjetil Sunde; Helge Myklebust; Jörg Assmus; Eldar Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Impact of a Mobile App on Paramedics' Perceived and Physiologic Stress Response During Simulated Prehospital Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Study Nested Within a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Lacour; Laurie Bloudeau; Christophe Combescure; Kevin Haddad; Florence Hugon; Laurent Suppan; Frédérique Rodieux; Christian Lovis; Alain Gervaix; Frédéric Ehrler; Sergio Manzano; Johan N Siebert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Effect of Psychophysiological Stress and Socio-Emotional Competencies on the Clinical Performance of Nursing Students during a Simulation Practice.

Authors:  Elba Mauriz; Sandra Caloca-Amber; Lucía Córdoba-Murga; Ana María Vázquez-Casares
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Impact of a stress coping strategy on perceived stress levels and performance during a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sabina Hunziker; Simona Pagani; Katrin Fasler; Franziska Tschan; Norbert K Semmer; Stephan Marsch
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-22

8.  Status of Nordic research on simulation-based learning in healthcare: an integrative review.

Authors:  Sissel Eikeland Husebø; Minna Silvennoinen; Eerika Rosqvist; Italo Masiello
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-04

9.  Effect of an audience on trainee stress and performance during simulated neonatal intubation: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Brahim Bensouda; Romain Mandel; Abdelwaheb Mejri; Jean Lachapelle; Marie St-Hilaire; Nabeel Ali
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Loric Stuby; Laurent Jampen; Julien Sierro; Erik Paus; Thierry Spichiger; Laurent Suppan; David Thurre
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.