Literature DB >> 21076100

Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in dry-extruded expelled soybean meal, extruded canola seed-pea, feather meal, and poultry by-product meal for broiler chickens.

A Bandegan1, E Kiarie, R L Payne, G H Crow, W Guenter, C M Nyachoti.   

Abstract

Ileal digestibility of amino acids (AA) in dry-extruded expelled soybean meal (DESBM), co-extruded canola seed-pea blend (ECSP, 50:50 wt/wt basis), poultry by-product meal (PBPM), and feather meal (FM) were determined in broiler chicks. For each ingredient, 5 samples each collected on different occasions were evaluated. Birds (n = 180 for each sample) were fed a commercial starter diet from d 1 to 15 of age followed by the test diets from d 15 to 21. Dry-extruded expelled soybean meal, ECSP, PBPM, and FM were included in the test diets at 95.3, 95.3, 38.4, and 28.4%, respectively, as the sole source of AA and balanced for minerals and vitamins. Chromic oxide (0.3%) was included in all diets as a digestibility marker. Each diet (5 per ingredient) was randomly assigned to 6 replicate cages, each with 6 birds. On d 21, birds were killed to collect ileal digesta for determining the apparent ileal AA digestibility on cage basis. The standardized ileal digestibility (SID) values were calculated using ileal endogenous AA losses previously determined in our laboratory. The apparent ileal digestibility of AA ranged from 78 to 91%, 68 to 83%, 51 to 81%, and 39 to 74% for DESBM, ECSP, PBPM, and FM, respectively. The respective ranges for SID values were 83 to 96%, 72 to 85%, 58 to 86%, and 42 to 78%. Among the indispensable AA, the lowest SID was observed for Thr in all test ingredients, whereas the highest SID was observed for Phe except in ECSP in which Arg had the highest SID. The SID of Lys (CV) were 91% (2.8%), 79% (2.0%), 78% (7.4%), and 60% (10%) for DESBM, ECSP, PBPM, and FM, respectively, whereas the SID of TSAA (CV) were 88% (4.5%), 77% (2.4%), 74% (9.0%), and 55% (18%), respectively. These SID AA data will help nutritionists to formulate broiler diets that more closely match the birds' requirements and minimize nutrient excess.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076100     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  In vitro pepsin digestibility and amino acid composition in soluble and residual fractions of hydrolyzed chicken feathers.

Authors:  S A Adler; R Slizyte; K Honkapää; A-K Løes
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparative amino acid digestibility between broiler chickens and pigs fed different poultry by-products and meat and bone meal.

Authors:  Chan Sol Park; Victor Daniel Naranjo; John Kyaw Htoo; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Nutritional Potentials of Atypical Feed Ingredients for Broiler Chickens and Pigs.

Authors:  Olufemi Oluwaseun Babatunde; Chan Sol Park; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Amino acid digestibility coefficient values of animal protein meals with dietary protease for broiler chickens.

Authors:  Antonio G Bertechini; Júlio C C de Carvalho; Andressa C Carvalho; Felipe S Dalolio; Jose O B Sorbara
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-09

5.  Isolation of Bacillus sp. A5.3 Strain with Keratinolytic Activity.

Authors:  Saniya Aktayeva; Kairat Baltin; Assel Kiribayeva; Zhiger Akishev; Dmitriy Silayev; Yerlan Ramankulov; Bekbolat Khassenov
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  Efficiency of Soybean Products in Broiler Chicken Nutrition.

Authors:  Alina Janocha; Anna Milczarek; Daria Pietrusiak; Kamil Łaski; Mohamed Saleh
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Prediction of the total and standardized ileal digestible amino acid contents from the chemical composition of soybean meals of different origin in broilers.

Authors:  Behzad Sadighi Sheikhhasan; Hossein Moravej; Mahmoud Shivazad; Fateme Ghaziani; Enric Esteve-Garcia; Woo Kyun Kim
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.