Literature DB >> 29796647

In vitro pepsin digestibility and amino acid composition in soluble and residual fractions of hydrolyzed chicken feathers.

S A Adler1, R Slizyte2, K Honkapää3, A-K Løes4.   

Abstract

Beta-keratin in poultry feathers is a structural protein that is resistant to degradation due to n class="Chemical">disulfide and hydrogen bonds. Feather meal can be a valuable feed compound if the digestibility can be increased. The objective of the present study was to analyze the effects of chemical, enzymatic, and pressure-thermic treatments for chicken feathers on solubility, in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD), and amino acid composition of solubilized and residual fractions. Two experiments were conducted. In experiment 1, models for solubility and IVPD were developed including the above factors applying a central composite face-centered design. Addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium sulfite (Na2SO3), and autoclaving time affected solubility and IVPD of the feather hydrolysates, but not addition of keratinolytic enzyme. In experiment 2, 7 combinations of the hydrolysis factors NaOH, Na2SO3, and autoclaving time with a predicted IVPD of 900 g/kg of DM, calculated for the sum of solubilized and residual feather fractions, were included to measure effects on IVPD and amino acid composition in each fraction. The IVPD values were higher for solubilized than residual fractions when treated with NaOH and autoclaving, but no differences were found when treated with Na2SO3 and autoclaving. Losses of cystine were substantial for all treatments, but lower for Na2SO3 than for NaOH. Furthermore, use of lower Na2SO3 concentration and longer autoclaving time reduced losses of cystine. Compared with NaOH treatments, Na2SO3 gave lower losses of threonine, arginine, serine, and tyrosine. With reference to the ideal protein profile for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), the treatments with 60 or 90 min autoclaving and 0.36 or 0.21% Na2SO3 had the highest chemical scores. The scores were generally higher for amino acids in residual than solubilized fractions, but with 90 min autoclaving and 0.21% Na2SO3 differences were small. In conclusion, hydrolysis of chicken feathers with low concentrations of Na2SO3 combined with autoclaving results in feather meal with high nutritional value for Atlantic salmon; separation of solubilized and residual fractions is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29796647      PMCID: PMC6093747          DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Effect of enzymatic and chemical treatments on feather solubility and digestibility.

Authors:  W K Kim; E S Lorenz; P H Patterson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Microbial keratinases and their prospective applications: an overview.

Authors:  Rani Gupta; Priya Ramnani
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Biotechnological applications and prospective market of microbial keratinases.

Authors:  Rani Gupta; Rinky Rajput; Richa Sharma; Namita Gupta
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Processing poultry feathers into keratin hydrolysate through alkaline-enzymatic hydrolysis.

Authors:  Pavel Mokrejs; Petr Svoboda; Josef Hrncirik; Dagmar Janacova; Vladimir Vasek
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2010-05-18

5.  Influence of growth of Streptomyces fradiae on pepsin-HCl digestibility and methionine content of feather meal.

Authors:  H H Elmayergi; R E Smith
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Lime treatment of keratinous materials for the generation of highly digestible animal feed: 1. Chicken feathers.

Authors:  Guillermo Coward-Kelly; Vincent S Chang; Frank K Agbogbo; Mark T Holtzapple
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  The optimum dietary indispensable amino acid pattern for growing Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fry.

Authors:  Xavier Rollin; Muriel Mambrini; Tarik Abboudi; Yvan Larondelle; Sadasivam J Kaushik
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 8.  Potential of chicken by-products as sources of useful biological resources.

Authors:  Adeseye Lasekan; Fatimah Abu Bakar; Dzulkifly Hashim
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 7.145

9.  Comparison of four feed proteases for improvement of nutritive value of poultry feather meal.

Authors:  M B Pedersen; S Yu; P Plumstead; S Dalsgaard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors.

Authors:  Neil D Rawlings; Alan J Barrett; Robert Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Hard Choice about Dry Pet Food: Comparison of Protein and Lipid Nutritional Qualities and Digestibility of Three Different Chicken-Based Formulations.

Authors:  Nicolò Montegiove; Eleonora Calzoni; Alessio Cesaretti; Roberto Maria Pellegrino; Carla Emiliani; Alessia Pellegrino; Leonardo Leonardi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  An Alternative Approach to Evaluate the Quality of Protein-Based Raw Materials for Dry Pet Food.

Authors:  Nicolò Montegiove; Roberto Maria Pellegrino; Carla Emiliani; Alessia Pellegrino; Leonardo Leonardi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Isolation of Bacillus sp. A5.3 Strain with Keratinolytic Activity.

Authors:  Saniya Aktayeva; Kairat Baltin; Assel Kiribayeva; Zhiger Akishev; Dmitriy Silayev; Yerlan Ramankulov; Bekbolat Khassenov
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Capping dietary starch:protein ratios in moderately reduced crude protein, wheat-based diets showed promise but further reductions generated inferior growth performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Shiva Greenhalgh; Bernard V McInerney; Leon R McQuade; Peter V Chrystal; Ali Khoddami; Molly A M Zhuang; Sonia Y Liu; Peter H Selle
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2020-01-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.