Literature DB >> 21075015

Gallbladder cancer: differences in presentation, surgical treatment, and survival in patients treated at centers in three countries.

Jean M Butte1, Kenichi Matsuo, Mithat Gönen, Michael I D'Angelica, Enrique Waugh, Peter J Allen, Yuman Fong, Ronald P DeMatteo, Leslie Blumgart, Itaru Endo, Hernán De La Fuente, William R Jarnagin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBCA) is a rare malignancy with a variable incidence worldwide. This study analyzed GBCA patients treated at centers in 3 countries. The aim was to assess for location-specific differences in presentation and outcomes, which might suggest differences in pathogenesis or disease biology. STUDY
DESIGN: Data for consecutive patients submitted to operation at Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez (FALP, Chile), Yokohama City University (YCU, Japan), and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, USA) between 1999 and 2007 were studied retrospectively. Patient demographics, disease- and treatment-related variables and outcomes were analyzed by chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and log-rank test.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one patients (MSKCC, 130; FALP, 85; YCU, 46) underwent exploration, and 160 (MSKCC, 91; FALP, 33; YCU, 36) underwent R0 resection. Patients treated at FALP were younger (median 57 years, p < 0.001) and more often female (80%, p < 0.005); at YCU there were fewer patients with incidental tumors (19.5% compared with more than 60% at FALP and MSKCC, p < 0.001). En bloc liver and bile duct resections were performed more commonly at MSKCC and YCU (p < 0.001). Patients treated at FALP had more advanced tumor stage compared with those treated at MSKCC and YCU (p < 0.001). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was not different among the groups when patients submitted to an R0 resection were analyzed (p = 0.12). On multivariate analysis, T-stage, nodal involvement, and bile duct involvement were predictors of DSS; center was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite some differences in presentation, disease extent, and surgical treatment, DSS after curative intent resection was similar among all 3 groups. The most important predictors of outcomes were related to tumor extent rather than country of origin.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075015     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  45 in total

1.  Relevance of residual disease after liver resection for incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Javier C Lendoire; Luis Gil; Fernando Duek; Carlos Quarin; Verónica Garay; Gabriel Raffin; Marcelo Rivaldi; Oks Alejandra; Oscar Imventarza
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Bile duct involvement portends poor prognosis in resected gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert Eil; Paul D Hansen; Maria Cassera; Susan L Orloff; Brett C Sheppard; Brian Diggs; Kevin G Billingsley
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2013-07

Review 3.  Key factors influencing prognosis in relation to gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles Henry Caldow Pilgrim; Ryan T Groeschl; Kiran K Turaga; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Preoperative C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as a Predictive Factor for Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Masashi Utsumi; Hideki Aoki; Seichi Nagahisa; Seitaro Nishimura; Yuta Une; Yuji Kimura; Megumi Watanabe; Fumitaka Taniguchi; Takashi Arata; Koh Katsuda; Kohji Tanakaya
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Extra-Hepatic Bile Duct Resection: an Insight in the Management of Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Durgatosh Pandey; Pankaj Kumar Garg; N M L Manjunath; Jyoti Sharma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-09

6.  Benefit of extended radical surgery for incidental gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Junpei Yamaguchi; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yuichi Takayama; Shunsuke Onoe; Masatoshi Isogai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Excision in T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer: a Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Steffen; Sabrina M Ebinger; Ignazio Tarantino; Bernhard Widmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Does the Frequency of Cholecystectomy Affect the Ensuing Incidence of Gallbladder Cancer in Sweden? A Population-Based Study with a 16-Year Coverage.

Authors:  R Noel; U Arnelo; L Lundell; G Sandblom
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Modern perspectives on factors predisposing to the development of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles H C Pilgrim; Ryan T Groeschl; Kathleen K Christians; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  MALAT1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of gallbladder cancer cells by activating the ERK/MAPK pathway.

Authors:  Xiang-Song Wu; Xu-An Wang; Wen-Guang Wu; Yun-Ping Hu; Mao-Lan Li; Qian Ding; Hao Weng; Yi-Jun Shu; Tian-Yu Liu; Lin Jiang; Yang Cao; Run-Fa Bao; Jia-Sheng Mu; Zhu-Jun Tan; Feng Tao; Ying-Bin Liu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.