Literature DB >> 21074772

Mixed-mode failure strength of implant-cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness.

J Zelle1, D Janssen, S Peeters, C Brouwer, N Verdonschot.   

Abstract

Aseptic loosening at the implant-cement interface is a well-documented cause of failure in joint arthroplasty. Traditionally, the strength of the implant-cement interface is determined using uni-axial normal and shear loading tests. However, during functional loading, the implant fixation sites are loaded under more complex stress conditions. For this purpose, the strength of the implant-cement interface under mixed-mode tensile and shear loading conditions was determined in this study using interface specimens with varying interface roughness. For the lowest roughness value analyzed (R(a)=0.89 μm), the interface strength was 0.40-1.95 MPa at loading angles varying between pure tension and shear, whereas this was 4.90-9.90 MPa for the highest roughness value (R(a)=2.76 μm). The interface strength during pure shear (1.95-9.90 MPa) was substantially higher than during pure tension (0.58-6.67 MPa). Polynomial regression was used to fit a second-order interpolation function through the experimental interface strength data (R²=0.85; p<0.001), relating the interface strength (S [MPa]) to the interface loading angle (α [degrees]) and interface roughness (R(a) [μm]): S(α,R(a))=0.891R²(a)+0.001α²-0.189R(a)-0.064α-0.060. Finally, an interface failure criterion was derived from the interface strength measurements, describing the risk of failure at the implant-cement interface when subjected to a certain tensile and shear stress using only the interface strength in pure tensile and shear direction. The findings presented in this paper can be used in numerical models to simulate loosening at the implant-cement interface.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074772     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Interface micromechanics of transverse sections from retrieved cemented hip reconstructions: an experimental and finite element comparison.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Sanaz Berahmani; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Micro and nano MgO particles for the improvement of fracture toughness of bone-cement interfaces.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Yanling Li; Tracy Morris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Kathleen N Meyers; Nicholas Schraut; Kapil G Mehrotra; Joseph D Lipman; Timothy M Wright; Michael P Ast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Effect of additive particles on mechanical, thermal, and cell functioning properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Melville B Vaughan; Tracy L Morris; Jeremiah J White; Zhaotong Meng
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-05-27

5.  Squatting-related tibiofemoral shear reaction forces and a biomechanical rationale for femoral component loosening.

Authors:  Ashvin Thambyah; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-20

6.  A preclinical numerical assessment of a polyetheretherketone femoral component in total knee arthroplasty during gait.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Dennis Janssen; Adam Briscoe; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  The Effects of Cyclic Loading and Motion on the Implant-Cement Interface and Cement Mantle of PEEK and Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Raelene M Cowie; Louise M Jennings; Adam Briscoe; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Fracture toughness of titanium-cement interfaces: effects of fibers and loading angles.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Khatri Chhetri Utsaha; Tracy Morris
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.