Literature DB >> 21071581

The provision of a percutaneously placed enteral tube feeding service.

David Westaby1, Alison Young, Paul O'Toole, Geoff Smith, David S Sanders.   

Abstract

There is overwhelming evidence that the maintenance of enteral feeding is beneficial in patients in whom oral access has been diminished or lost. Short-term enteral access is usually achieved via naso-enteral tube placement. For longer term tube feeding there are recognised advantages for enteral feeding tubes placed percutaneously. The provision of a percutaneous enteral tube feeding service should be within the remit of the hospital nutrition support team (NST). This designated team should provide a framework for patient selection, pre-assessment and post-procedural care. Close working relations with community-based services should be established. An accredited therapeutic endoscopist should be a member of the NST and direct the technical aspects of the service. Every endoscopy unit in an acute hospital setting should provide a basic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) service. This should include provision for fitting a PEG jejunal extension (PEGJ) if required. Specialist units should be identified where a more comprehensive service is provided, including direct jejunal placement (DPEJ), as well as radiological and laparoscopically placed tubes. Good understanding of the indications for percutaneous enteral tube feeding will prevent inappropriate procedures and ensure that the correct feeding route is selected at the appropriate time. Each unit should adopt and become familiar with a limited range of PEG tube equipment. Careful adherence to the important technical details of tube insertion will reduce peri-procedural complications. Post-procedural complications remain relatively common, however, and an awareness of the correct approach to managing them is essential for all clinicians involved in providing a percutaneous enteral tube feeding service. Finally, ethical considerations should always be taken into account when considering long-term enteral feeding, especially for patients with a poor quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21071581     DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.204982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  20 in total

1.  Endoscopic placement of enteral feeding tubes.

Authors:  Gerard P Rafferty; Tony Ck Tham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-16

2.  Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement.

Authors:  Theresa A Fessler; Timothy B Short; Kate F Willcutts; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Interventions for Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Beatrice Manduchi; Gina Marni Fainman; Margaret Walshe
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Cui bono? PEG feeding.

Authors:  Heather Parr; David S Sanders
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Successful endoscopic closure of gastrocutaneous fistula with an over-the-scope clip.

Authors:  Ricardo Küttner Magalhães; Sílvia Barrias; Carla Rolanda; Marta Salgado; Maria João Magalhães; Vitor Simões; Isabel Pedroto
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): cui bono?

Authors:  Seamus O'Mahony
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-16

7.  Nasal unsedated seated percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (nuPEG): a safe and effective technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in high-risk candidates.

Authors:  Neil C Fisher; James Rees; John Frost
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 8.  Difficulties with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a practical guide for the endoscopist.

Authors:  S O'Mahony
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Buried bumper syndrome: A complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Jiri Cyrany; Stanislav Rejchrt; Marcela Kopacova; Jan Bures
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Gastrointestinal tract access for enteral nutrition in critically ill and trauma patients: indications, techniques, and complications.

Authors:  M Tuna; R Latifi; A El-Menyar; H Al Thani
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.