Literature DB >> 21071209

Objective assessment, selection, and certification in surgery.

Melina C Vassiliou1, Liane S Feldman.   

Abstract

Historically, surgical competence has been evaluated subjectively. Fundamental changes in surgical technology and training have focused attention on the use of objective measurement of performance to improve patient safety and reduce errors. Surgical performance can be measured using a variety of tools, both in the clinical and simulated environments. Objective assessments can play a role in training by improving the evaluation and feedback. At the end of training or when a new skill is acquired, objective assessments may be used to ensure that a proficiency level has been reached and potentially as a condition for independent practice. When assessments are used for high-stakes evaluations like certification, they must be demonstrably reliable and valid. The definition of assessment, and the necessary components of a valid instrument, will be summarized. An overview of practical applications of objective assessment as it applies to training, selection, and certification of surgeons will be presented.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21071209     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  9 in total

1.  What errors make a laparoscopic cancer surgery unsafe? An ad hoc analysis of competency assessment in the National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England.

Authors:  Melody Ni; Hugh Mackenzie; Adam Widdison; John T Jenkins; Steve Mansfield; Tony Dixon; Dominic Slade; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Systematic review of the implementation of simulation training in surgical residency curriculum.

Authors:  Yo Kurashima; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Assessment of surgical performance of laparoscopic benign hiatal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Mohammed Al Mahroos; Tara Landry; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Acquisition of suture skills during medical graduation by instructor-directed training: a randomized controlled study comparing senior medical students and faculty surgeons.

Authors:  Rafael Denadai; Andréia Padilha Toledo; Marie Oshiiwa; Rogério Saad-Hossne
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-02-13

6.  A novel assessment tool for evaluating competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen; William Walker; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Simulation-based cutaneous surgical-skill training on a chicken-skin bench model in a medical undergraduate program.

Authors:  Rafael Denadai; Rogério Saad-Hossne; Luís Ricardo Martinhão Souto
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics may not correlate with operative performance in a novice cohort.

Authors:  Sarah N Steigerwald; Jason Park; Krista M Hardy; Lawrence Gillman; Ashley S Vergis
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-12-04

Review 9.  Skill Acquisition, Assessment, and Simulation in Minimal Access Surgery: An Evolution of Technical Training in Surgery.

Authors:  Ashley Vergis; Sarah Steigerwald
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.