Carrie R Daniel1, Amanda J Cross, Corinna Koebnick, Rashmi Sinha. 1. Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Carrie.Daniel@nih.hhs.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the trends, distribution, potential determinants and public health implications of meat consumption within the USA. DESIGN: We examined temporal trends in meat consumption using food availability data from the FAO and US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and further evaluated the meat intake by type (red, white, processed) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) linked to the MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED). RESULTS: Overall meat consumption has continued to rise in the USA and the rest of the developed world. Despite a shift towards higher poultry consumption, red meat still represents the largest proportion of meat consumed in the USA (58 %). Twenty-two per cent of the meat consumed in the USA is processed. According to the NHANES 2003-2004, total meat intake averaged 128 g/d. The type and quantities of meat reported varied by education, race, age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Given the plausible epidemiological evidence for red and processed meat intake in cancer and chronic disease risk, understanding the trends and determinants of meat consumption in the USA, where meat is consumed at more than three times the global average, should be particularly pertinent to researchers and other public health professionals aiming to reduce the global burden of chronic disease.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the trends, distribution, potential determinants and public health implications of meat consumption within the USA. DESIGN: We examined temporal trends in meat consumption using food availability data from the FAO and US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and further evaluated the meat intake by type (red, white, processed) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) linked to the MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED). RESULTS: Overall meat consumption has continued to rise in the USA and the rest of the developed world. Despite a shift towards higher poultry consumption, red meat still represents the largest proportion of meat consumed in the USA (58 %). Twenty-two per cent of the meat consumed in the USA is processed. According to the NHANES 2003-2004, total meat intake averaged 128 g/d. The type and quantities of meat reported varied by education, race, age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Given the plausible epidemiological evidence for red and processed meat intake in cancer and chronic disease risk, understanding the trends and determinants of meat consumption in the USA, where meat is consumed at more than three times the global average, should be particularly pertinent to researchers and other public health professionals aiming to reduce the global burden of chronic disease.
Authors: Amanda J Cross; Leah M Ferrucci; Adam Risch; Barry I Graubard; Mary H Ward; Yikyung Park; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Rashmi Sinha Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Timothy J Key; Paul N Appleby; Elizabeth A Spencer; Ruth C Travis; Andrew W Roddam; Naomi E Allen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Valeria Pala; Vittorio Krogh; Franco Berrino; Sabina Sieri; Sara Grioni; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Kim Overvad; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Isabelle Romieu; Jakob Linseisen; Sabine Rohrmann; Heiner Boeing; Annika Steffen; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vassiliki Benetou; Androniki Naska; Paolo Vineis; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Giovanna Masala; Claudia Agnoli; Dagrun Engeset; Guri Skeie; Eiliv Lund; Eva Ardanaz; Carmen Navarro; Maria-José Sánchez; Pilar Amiano; Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Svatetz; Laudina Rodriguez; Elisabet Wirfält; Jonas Manjer; Per Lenner; Göran Hallmans; Petra H M Peeters; Carla H van Gils; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Fränzel J B van Duijnhoven; Timothy J Key; Elizabeth Spencer; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Pietro Ferrari; Graham Byrnes; Sabina Rinaldi; Teresa Norat; Dominique S Michaud; Elio Riboli Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rachel R Huxley; Alireza Ansary-Moghaddam; Peter Clifton; Sebastien Czernichow; Christine L Parr; Mark Woodward Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Francesca Dominici; Yun Wang; Andrew W Correia; Majid Ezzati; C Arden Pope; Douglas W Dockery Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Matthew Lorber; Arnold Schecter; Olaf Paepke; William Shropshire; Krista Christensen; Linda Birnbaum Journal: Environ Int Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Yun Wang; Judith H Lichtman; Kumar Dharmarajan; Frederick A Masoudi; Joseph S Ross; John A Dodson; Jersey Chen; John A Spertus; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Urmila Chandran; Gary Zirpoli; Gregory Ciupak; Susan E McCann; Zhihong Gong; Karen Pawlish; Yong Lin; Kitaw Demissie; Christine B Ambrosone; Elisa V Bandera Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Lucas Silva Azevedo; Inacio Abreu Pestana; Annaliza Carvalho Meneguelli-Souza; Bruno Ramos; Daniel Ribeiro Pessanha; Dayana Caldas; Marcelo Gomes Almeida; Cristina Maria Magalhaes de Souza Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.223