Literature DB >> 21070493

Patient and parent preferences for haemophilia A treatments.

A F Mohamed1, J D Epstein, J M Li-McLeod.   

Abstract

Little is known about the relative importance of factor VIII (FVIII) treatment attributes to haemophilia A patients and their willingness to accept trade-offs among these attributes. To quantify patient and parent preferences for FVIII treatments and compare the relative importance of treatment attributes. Adult patients and parents of children with severe haemophilia A in the US completed a web-enabled, choice-format conjoint survey that presented a series of 12 trade-off questions, each including a pair of hypothetical treatment profiles. Each profile was defined by percent of bleeds stopped with one or two infusions, chance of developing an inhibitor, risk of viral infection, preparation volume, dosage strengths available, and history of supply shortage. Trade-off questions were based on a D-optimal experimental design. Preference weights for attribute levels were estimated using random-parameters logit. One hundred and forty seven subjects completed the survey. Over the ranges of attribute levels included in the study, risk of viral infection was the most important attribute. Remaining attributes were ranked in decreasing order of importance as follows: chance of developing an inhibitor, dosage strengths available, percent of bleeds stopped with one or two infusions, history of supply shortage, and preparation volume. Risk of viral infection was 6.0 times as important as percent of bleeds stopped with one or two infusions and 2.7 times as important as the chance of developing an inhibitor. While risk of viral infection was the most important attribute, this research demonstrates that many FVIII treatment attributes are important in the decision-making process.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21070493     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02411.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  6 in total

1.  Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results.

Authors:  Amy D Shapiro; Pantep Angchaisuksiri; Jan Astermark; Gary Benson; Giancarlo Castaman; Pratima Chowdary; Hermann Eichler; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Kaan Kavakli; Tadashi Matsushita; Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen; Allison P Wheeler; Guy Young; Silva Zupancic-Salek; Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The role of patient and healthcare professionals in the era of new hemophilia treatments in developed and developing countries.

Authors:  Fadi Nossair; Courtney D Thornburg
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2018-07-02

4.  The first recombinant human coagulation factor VIII of human origin: human cell line and manufacturing characteristics.

Authors:  Elisabeth Casademunt; Kristina Martinelle; Mats Jernberg; Stefan Winge; Maya Tiemeyer; Lothar Biesert; Sigurd Knaub; Olaf Walter; Carola Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Patients' willingness to accept the risks and benefits of new treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Teresa L Kauf; Ateesha F Mohamed; A Brett Hauber; Derek Fetzer; Atiya Ahmad
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Attitudes of Individuals with Gaucher Disease toward Substrate Reduction Therapies.

Authors:  Victoria F Wagner; Hope Northrup; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Joanne M Nguyen; Mary Kay Koenig; Jessica M Davis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.