PURPOSE: The aim of this clinical research on implant-supported restorations is to analyze, through spectrophotometric digital technology, the influence of the abutment material on the color of the peri-implant soft tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients received an endosseous dental implant in the anterior maxilla. At the time of each definitive prosthesis delivery, an all-ceramic crown has been tried on gold, titanium and zirconia abutment. After the insertion of each single abutment, the peri-implant soft tissue color has been measured through a spectrophotometer. Also, the thickness of the facial peri-implant soft tissue was measured at the level of the implant neck through a caliper. A specific software has been utilized to identify a specific tissue area and to collect the data before the statistical analysis in Lab* color space. The normality of the quantitative variables was verified by means of the Shapiro-Wilk test. Simple linear correlation between quantitative variables was evaluated by using Pearson's coefficient. The results on the performance of the abutment materials with regard to the color measurements and the overall measurement ΔE were described by computing the least-square means. The significance of differences among types of abutment was verified by means of the Scheffe test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: For all the abutments used, the color of the peri-implant soft tissue appeared to be significantly different from the one of the contra-lateral tooth (ΔE>8.5). Significantly higher (P<0.05) difference were present with the use of titanium abutments (11 ± 0.4) when compared with the results of gold (8.9 ± 0.4) and zirconia (8.5 ± 0.4) abutments. No correlation has been demonstrated between soft tissue thickness and degree of color difference (P>0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of the present study, the peri-implant soft tissue color appears to be different from the soft tissue color around natural teeth, no matter which type of restorative material is selected. When titanium abutment was selected, significantly higher differences were present than those obtained with gold or zirconia abutments. The thickness of the peri-implant soft tissue did not appear to be a crucial factor in the abutment impact on the soft tissue color.
PURPOSE: The aim of this clinical research on implant-supported restorations is to analyze, through spectrophotometric digital technology, the influence of the abutment material on the color of the peri-implant soft tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients received an endosseous dental implant in the anterior maxilla. At the time of each definitive prosthesis delivery, an all-ceramic crown has been tried on gold, titanium and zirconia abutment. After the insertion of each single abutment, the peri-implant soft tissue color has been measured through a spectrophotometer. Also, the thickness of the facial peri-implant soft tissue was measured at the level of the implant neck through a caliper. A specific software has been utilized to identify a specific tissue area and to collect the data before the statistical analysis in Lab* color space. The normality of the quantitative variables was verified by means of the Shapiro-Wilk test. Simple linear correlation between quantitative variables was evaluated by using Pearson's coefficient. The results on the performance of the abutment materials with regard to the color measurements and the overall measurement ΔE were described by computing the least-square means. The significance of differences among types of abutment was verified by means of the Scheffe test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: For all the abutments used, the color of the peri-implant soft tissue appeared to be significantly different from the one of the contra-lateral tooth (ΔE>8.5). Significantly higher (P<0.05) difference were present with the use of titanium abutments (11 ± 0.4) when compared with the results of gold (8.9 ± 0.4) and zirconia (8.5 ± 0.4) abutments. No correlation has been demonstrated between soft tissue thickness and degree of color difference (P>0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of the present study, the peri-implant soft tissue color appears to be different from the soft tissue color around natural teeth, no matter which type of restorative material is selected. When titanium abutment was selected, significantly higher differences were present than those obtained with gold or zirconia abutments. The thickness of the peri-implant soft tissue did not appear to be a crucial factor in the abutment impact on the soft tissue color.