Literature DB >> 21069697

Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes.

Zohra S Lassi1, Batool A Haider, Zulfiqar A Bhutta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While maternal, infant and under-five child mortality rates in developing countries have declined significantly in the past two to three decades, newborn mortality rates have reduced much more slowly. While it is recognised that almost half of the newborn deaths can be prevented by scaling up evidence-based available interventions such as tetanus toxoid immunisation to mothers; clean and skilled care at delivery; newborn resuscitation; exclusive breastfeeding; clean umbilical cord care; management of infections in newborns, many require facility based and outreach services. It has also been stated that a significant proportion of these mortalities and morbidities could also be potentially addressed by developing community-based packages interventions which should also be supplemented by developing and strengthening linkages with the local health systems. Some of the recent community-based studies of interventions targeting women of reproductive age have shown variable impacts on maternal outcomes and hence it is uncertain if these strategies have consistent benefit across the continuum of maternal and newborn care.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of community-based intervention packages in reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality; and improving neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2010), World Bank's JOLIS (12 January 2010), BLDS at IDS and IDEAS database of unpublished working papers (12 January 2010), Google and Google Scholar (12 January 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: All prospective randomised and quasi-experimental trials evaluating the effectiveness of community-based intervention packages in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidities; and improving neonatal outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
RESULTS: The review included 18 cluster-randomised/quasi-randomised trials, covering a wide range of interventional packages, including two subsets from one trial. We incorporated data from these trials using generic inverse variance method in which logarithms of risk ratio estimates were used along with the standard error of the logarithms of risk ratio estimates. Our review did not show any reduction in maternal mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.02, random-effects (10 studies, n = 144,956), I² 39%, P value 0.10. However, significant reduction was observed in maternal morbidity (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92, random-effects (four studies, n = 138,290), I² 28%; neonatal mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.84, random-effects (12 studies, n = 136,425), I² 69%, P value < 0.001), stillbirths (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97, random-effects (11studies, n = 113,821), I² 66%, P value 0.001) and perinatal mortality (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.91, random-effects (10 studies, n = 110,291), I² 82%, P value < 0.001) as a consequence of implementation of community-based interventional care packages. It also increased the referrals to health facility for pregnancy related complication by 40% (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.65, fixed-effect (two studies, n = 22,800), I² 0%, P value 0.76), and improved the rates of early breastfeeding by 94% (RR 1.94; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.42, random-effects (six studies, n = 20,627), I² 97%, P value < 0.001). We assessed our primary outcomes for publication bias, but observed no such asymmetry on the funnel plot. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Our review offers encouraging evidence of the value of integrating maternal and newborn care in community settings through a range of interventions which can be packaged effectively for delivery through a range of community health workers and health promotion groups. While the importance of skilled delivery and facility-based services for maternal and newborn care cannot be denied, there is sufficient evidence to scale up community-based care through packages which can be delivered by a range of community-based workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21069697     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007754.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  160 in total

Review 1.  Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period.

Authors:  Naohiro Yonemoto; Therese Dowswell; Shuko Nagai; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-02

2.  Effect of an integrated community-based package for maternal and newborn care on feeding patterns during the first 12 weeks of life: a cluster-randomized trial in a South African township.

Authors:  Petrida Ijumba; Tanya Doherty; Debra Jackson; Mark Tomlinson; David Sanders; Sonja Swanevelder; Lars-Åke Persson
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Improved neonatal survival after participatory learning and action with women's groups: a prospective study in rural eastern India.

Authors:  Swati Sarbani Roy; Rajendra Mahapatra; Shibanand Rath; Aparna Bajpai; Vijay Singh; Suchitra Rath; Nirmala Nair; Prasanta Tripathy; Raj Kumar Gope; Rajesh Sinha; Anthony Costello; Christina Pagel; Audrey Prost
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.

Authors:  Valantine Ngum Ndze; Anelisa Jaca; Charles Shey Wiysonge
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Satellite images and machine learning can identify remote communities to facilitate access to health services.

Authors:  Emilie Bruzelius; Matthew Le; Avi Kenny; Jordan Downey; Matteo Danieletto; Aaron Baum; Patrick Doupe; Bruno Silva; Philip J Landrigan; Prabhjot Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists.

Authors:  Anelisa Jaca; Valantine Ngum Ndze; Charles Shey Wiysonge
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Delivering development? Evidence on self-help groups as development intermediaries in South Asia and Africa.

Authors:  Mary Kay Gugerty; Pierre Biscaye; C Leigh Anderson
Journal:  Dev Policy Rev       Date:  2018-04-15

8.  Evaluation of a Community-Based Approach to Strengthen Retention in Early Childhood Home Visiting.

Authors:  Alonzo T Folger; Anita L Brentley; Neera K Goyal; Eric S Hall; Ting Sa; James L Peugh; Angelique R Teeters; Judith B Van Ginkel; Robert T Ammerman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-01

9.  Is facility based neonatal care in low resource setting keeping pace? A glance at Uganda's National Referral Hospital.

Authors:  Yaser Abdallah; Flavia Namiiro; Jamir Mugalu; Jolly Nankunda; Yvonne Vaucher; Douglas McMillan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 10.  Delivery arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Agustín Ciapponi; Simon Lewin; Cristian A Herrera; Newton Opiyo; Tomas Pantoja; Elizabeth Paulsen; Gabriel Rada; Charles S Wiysonge; Gabriel Bastías; Lilian Dudley; Signe Flottorp; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Sebastian Garcia Marti; Claire Glenton; Charles I Okwundu; Blanca Peñaloza; Fatima Suleman; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.