BACKGROUND: Although 900,000 HIV-infected South Africans receive antiretroviral therapy, the majority of South Africans with HIV remain undiagnosed. METHODS: We use a published simulation model of HIV case detection and treatment to examine 3 HIV screening scenarios, in addition to current practice as follows: (1) one-time; (2) every 5 years; and (3) annually. South African model input data include the following: 16.9% HIV prevalence, 1.3% annual incidence, 49% test acceptance rate, HIV testing costs of $6.49/patient, and a 47% linkage-to-care rate (including 2 sequential antiretroviral therapy regimens) for identified cases. Outcomes include life expectancy, direct medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: HIV screening one-time, every 5 years, and annually increase HIV-infected quality-adjusted life expectancy (mean age 33 years) from 180.6 months (current practice) to 184.9, 187.6, and 197.2 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness of one-time screening is dominated by screening every 5 years. Screening every 5 years and annually each have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1570/quality-adjusted life year and $1720/quality-adjusted life year. Screening annually is very cost-effective even in settings with the lowest incidence/prevalence, with test acceptance and linkage rates both as low as 20%, or when accounting for a stigma impact at least four-fold that of the base case. CONCLUSIONS: In South Africa, annual voluntary HIV screening offers substantial clinical benefit and is very cost-effective, even with highly constrained access to care and treatment.
BACKGROUND: Although 900,000 HIV-infected South Africans receive antiretroviral therapy, the majority of South Africans with HIV remain undiagnosed. METHODS: We use a published simulation model of HIV case detection and treatment to examine 3 HIV screening scenarios, in addition to current practice as follows: (1) one-time; (2) every 5 years; and (3) annually. South African model input data include the following: 16.9% HIV prevalence, 1.3% annual incidence, 49% test acceptance rate, HIV testing costs of $6.49/patient, and a 47% linkage-to-care rate (including 2 sequential antiretroviral therapy regimens) for identified cases. Outcomes include life expectancy, direct medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS:HIV screening one-time, every 5 years, and annually increase HIV-infected quality-adjusted life expectancy (mean age 33 years) from 180.6 months (current practice) to 184.9, 187.6, and 197.2 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness of one-time screening is dominated by screening every 5 years. Screening every 5 years and annually each have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1570/quality-adjusted life year and $1720/quality-adjusted life year. Screening annually is very cost-effective even in settings with the lowest incidence/prevalence, with test acceptance and linkage rates both as low as 20%, or when accounting for a stigma impact at least four-fold that of the base case. CONCLUSIONS: In South Africa, annual voluntary HIV screening offers substantial clinical benefit and is very cost-effective, even with highly constrained access to care and treatment.
Authors: Nick Menzies; Betty Abang; Rhoda Wanyenze; Fred Nuwaha; Balaam Mugisha; Alex Coutinho; Rebecca Bunnell; Jonathan Mermin; John M Blandford Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; A David Paltiel; Elena Losina; Bethany L Morris; Callie A Scott; Erin R Rhode; George R Seage; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Thomas M Rehle; Timothy B Hallett; Olive Shisana; Victoria Pillay-van Wyk; Khangelani Zuma; Henri Carrara; Sean Jooste Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Lindsey L Wolf; Robin Wood; Mariam O Fofana; Kenneth A Freedberg; Neil A Martinson; A David Paltiel; Xavier Anglaret; Milton C Weinstein; Elena Losina Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael D April; Rochelle P Walensky; Yuchiao Chang; Jennifer Pitt; Kenneth A Freedberg; Elena Losina; A David Paltiel; Robin Wood Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Ji-Eun Park; Robin Wood; Kenneth A Freedberg; Callie A Scott; Linda-Gail Bekker; Elena Losina; Kenneth H Mayer; George R Seage; A David Paltiel Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Nadia N Abuelezam; Alethea W McCormick; Thomas Fussell; Abena N Afriyie; Robin Wood; Victor DeGruttola; Kenneth A Freedberg; Marc Lipsitch; George R Seage Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Paul K Drain; Emily P Hyle; Farzad Noubary; Kenneth A Freedberg; Douglas Wilson; William R Bishai; William Rodriguez; Ingrid V Bassett Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Nancy S Padian; Sandra I McCoy; Salim S Abdool Karim; Nina Hasen; Julia Kim; Michael Bartos; Elly Katabira; Stefano M Bertozzi; Bernhard Schwartländer; Myron S Cohen Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Marco Schito; Trevor F Peter; Sean Cavanaugh; Amy S Piatek; Gloria J Young; Heather Alexander; William Coggin; Gonzalo J Domingo; Dennis Ellenberger; Eugen Ermantraut; Ilesh V Jani; Achilles Katamba; Kara M Palamountain; Shaffiq Essajee; David W Dowdy Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Sten H Vermund; José A Tique; Holly M Cassell; Megan E Pask; Philip J Ciampa; Carolyn M Audet Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731