BACKGROUND: The results of international clinical trials that are assessing when to initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) will not be available for several years. OBJECTIVE: To inform HIV treatment decisions about the optimal CD4 threshold at which to initiate ART in South Africa while awaiting the results of these trials. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis by using a computer simulation model of HIV disease. DATA SOURCES: Published data from randomized trials and observational cohorts in South Africa. TARGET POPULATION: HIV-infected patients in South Africa. TIME HORIZON: 5-year and lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Modified societal. INTERVENTION: No treatment, ART initiated at a CD4 count less than 0.250 x 10(9) cells/L, and ART initiated at a CD4 count less than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L. OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, life expectancy, medical costs, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: If 10% to 100% of HIV-infected patients are identified and linked to care, a CD4 count threshold for ART initiation of 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L would reduce severe opportunistic diseases by 22,000 to 221,000 and deaths by 25,000 to 253,000 during the next 5 years compared with ART initiation at 0.250 x 10(9) cells/L; cost increases would range from $142 million (10%) to $1.4 billion (100%). Either ART initiation strategy would increase long-term survival by at least 7.9 years, with a mean per-person life expectancy of 3.8 years with no ART and 12.5 years with an initiation threshold of 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L. Compared with an initiation threshold of 0.250 x 10(9) cells/L, a threshold of 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1200 per year of life saved. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Initiating ART at a CD4 count less than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L would remain cost-effective over the next 5 years even if the probability that the trial would demonstrate the superiority of earlier therapy is as low as 17%. LIMITATION: This model does not consider the possible benefits of initiating ART at a CD4 count greater than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L or of reduced HIV transmission. CONCLUSION: Earlier initiation of ART in South Africa will probably reduce morbidity and mortality, improve long-term survival, and be cost-effective. While awaiting trial results, treatment guidelines should be liberalized to allow initiation at CD4 counts less than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L, earlier than is currently recommended. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.
BACKGROUND: The results of international clinical trials that are assessing when to initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) will not be available for several years. OBJECTIVE: To inform HIV treatment decisions about the optimal CD4 threshold at which to initiate ART in South Africa while awaiting the results of these trials. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis by using a computer simulation model of HIV disease. DATA SOURCES: Published data from randomized trials and observational cohorts in South Africa. TARGET POPULATION: HIV-infectedpatients in South Africa. TIME HORIZON: 5-year and lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Modified societal. INTERVENTION: No treatment, ART initiated at a CD4 count less than 0.250 x 10(9) cells/L, and ART initiated at a CD4 count less than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L. OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, life expectancy, medical costs, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: If 10% to 100% of HIV-infectedpatients are identified and linked to care, a CD4 count threshold for ART initiation of 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L would reduce severe opportunistic diseases by 22,000 to 221,000 and deaths by 25,000 to 253,000 during the next 5 years compared with ART initiation at 0.250 x 10(9) cells/L; cost increases would range from $142 million (10%) to $1.4 billion (100%). Either ART initiation strategy would increase long-term survival by at least 7.9 years, with a mean per-person life expectancy of 3.8 years with no ART and 12.5 years with an initiation threshold of 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L. Compared with an initiation threshold of 0.250 x 10(9) cells/L, a threshold of 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1200 per year of life saved. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Initiating ART at a CD4 count less than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L would remain cost-effective over the next 5 years even if the probability that the trial would demonstrate the superiority of earlier therapy is as low as 17%. LIMITATION: This model does not consider the possible benefits of initiating ART at a CD4 count greater than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L or of reduced HIV transmission. CONCLUSION: Earlier initiation of ART in South Africa will probably reduce morbidity and mortality, improve long-term survival, and be cost-effective. While awaiting trial results, treatment guidelines should be liberalized to allow initiation at CD4 counts less than 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L, earlier than is currently recommended. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.
Authors: Sue J Goldie; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Elena Losina; Milton C Weinstein; Xavier Anglaret; Rochelle P Walensky; Heather E Hsu; April Kimmel; Charles Holmes; Jonathan E Kaplan; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Milton C Weinstein; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Elena Losina; Lauren M Mercincavage; Siaka Touré; Nomita Divi; Xavier Anglaret; Sue J Goldie; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: K A Freedberg; E Losina; M C Weinstein; A D Paltiel; C J Cohen; G R Seage; D E Craven; H Zhang; A D Kimmel; S J Goldie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Robin Wood; Milton C Weinstein; Neil A Martinson; Elena Losina; Mariam O Fofana; Sue J Goldie; Nomita Divi; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Bingxia Wang; A David Paltiel; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Sean Emery; Jacqueline A Neuhaus; Andrew N Phillips; Abdel Babiker; Calvin J Cohen; Jose M Gatell; Pierre-Marie Girard; Birgit Grund; Matthew Law; Marcelo H Losso; Adrian Palfreeman; Robin Wood Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: R Scott Braithwaite; Mark S Roberts; Chung Chou H Chang; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Cynthia L Gibert; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Steven Shechter; Andrew Schaefer; Kimberly Nucifora; Robert Koppenhaver; Amy C Justice Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: W M El-Sadr; J D Lundgren; J D Neaton; F Gordin; D Abrams; R C Arduino; A Babiker; W Burman; N Clumeck; C J Cohen; D Cohn; D Cooper; J Darbyshire; S Emery; G Fätkenheuer; B Gazzard; B Grund; J Hoy; K Klingman; M Losso; N Markowitz; J Neuhaus; A Phillips; C Rappoport Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrice Severe; Marc Antoine Jean Juste; Alex Ambroise; Ludger Eliacin; Claudel Marchand; Sandra Apollon; Alison Edwards; Heejung Bang; Janet Nicotera; Catherine Godfrey; Roy M Gulick; Warren D Johnson; Jean William Pape; Daniel W Fitzgerald Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Albert K Minga; Charlotte Lewden; Delphine Gabillard; Germain I Bomisso; Thomas-d'aquin Toni; Arlette A Emième; Vincent Yapo; André Inwoley; Roger Salamon; Xavier Anglaret Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-03-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Reuben Granich; Siobhan Crowley; Marco Vitoria; Ying-Ru Lo; Yves Souteyrand; Christopher Dye; Charlie Gilks; Teguest Guerma; Kevin M De Cock; Brian Williams Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 5.396