Literature DB >> 21068278

Comparison of real-time multiplex human papillomavirus (HPV) PCR assays with INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping extra assay.

Elizabeth A Else1, Ryan Swoyer, Yuhua Zhang, Frank J Taddeo, Janine T Bryan, John Lawson, Inez Van Hyfte, Christine C Roberts.   

Abstract

Real-time type-specific multiplex human papillomavirus (HPV) PCR assays were developed to detect HPV DNA in samples collected for the efficacy determination of the quadrivalent HPV (type 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine (Gardasil). Additional multiplex (L1, E6, and E7 open reading frame [ORF]) or duplex (E6 and E7 ORF) HPV PCR assays were developed to detect high-risk HPV types, including HPV type 31 (HPV31), HPV33, HPV35, HPV39, HPV45, HPV51, HPV52, HPV56, HPV58, and HPV59. Here, we evaluated clinical specimen concordance and compared the limits of detection (LODs) between multiplex HPV PCR assays and the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra assay, which detects 28 types, for the 14 HPV types common to both of these methods. Overall HPV detection agreement rates were >90% for swabs and >95% for thin sections. Statistically significant differences in detection were observed for HPV6, HPV16, HPV18, HPV35, HPV39, HPV45, HPV56, HPV58, and HPV59 in swabs and for HPV45, HPV58, and HPV59 in thin sections. Where P was <0.05, discordance was due to detection of more HPV-positive samples by the multiplex HPV PCR assays. LODs were similar for eight HPV types, significantly lower in multiplex assays for five HPV types, and lower in INNO-LiPA for HPV6 only. LODs were under 50 copies for all HPV types, with the exception of HPV39, HPV58, and HPV59 in the INNO-LiPA assay. The overall percent agreement for detection of 14 HPV types between the type-specific multiplex HPV PCR and INNO-LiPA genotyping assays was good. The differences in positive sample detection favored multiplex HPV PCR, suggesting increased sensitivity of HPV DNA detection by type-specific multiplex HPV PCR assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068278      PMCID: PMC3122697          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00236-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Efficient treatment of paraffin-embedded cervical tissue for HPV DNA testing by HC-II and PCR assays.

Authors:  M Cricca; F Bonvicini; S Venturoli; S Ambretti; G Gallinella; G Gentilomi; M Musiani; M Zerbini
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.

Authors:  J M Walboomers; M V Jacobs; M M Manos; F X Bosch; J A Kummer; K V Shah; P J Snijders; J Peto; C J Meijer; N Muñoz
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Genotyping of human papillomavirus in liquid cytology cervical specimens by the PGMY line blot assay and the SPF(10) line probe assay.

Authors:  Leen-Jan van Doorn; Wim Quint; Bernhard Kleter; Anco Molijn; Brigitte Colau; Marie-Thérèse Martin; Norah Torrez-Martinez; Cheri L Peyton; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison between the Hybrid Capture II test and a PCR-based human papillomavirus detection method for diagnosis and posttreatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Anna Söderlund-Strand; Per Rymark; Pia Andersson; Joakim Dillner; Lena Dillner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial.

Authors:  Luisa L Villa; Ronaldo L R Costa; Carlos A Petta; Rosires P Andrade; Kevin A Ault; Anna R Giuliano; Cosette M Wheeler; Laura A Koutsky; Christian Malm; Matti Lehtinen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Sven-Eric Olsson; Margareta Steinwall; Darron R Brown; Robert J Kurman; Brigitte M Ronnett; Mark H Stoler; Alex Ferenczy; Diane M Harper; Gretchen M Tamms; Jimmy Yu; Lisa Lupinacci; Radha Railkar; Frank J Taddeo; Kathrin U Jansen; Mark T Esser; Heather L Sings; Alfred J Saah; Eliav Barr
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Detection of HPV in Norwegian cervical biopsy specimens with type-specific PCR and reverse line blot assays.

Authors:  Christine C Roberts; Amha S Tadesse; Jeffrey Sands; Tore Halvorsen; Timothy L Schofield; Are Dalen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Kathrin U Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Comparison of five different polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of human papillomavirus in cervical cell specimens.

Authors:  K Husnjak; M Grce; L Magdić; K Pavelić
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 8.  Overview of the clinical development and results of a quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) vaccine.

Authors:  Luisa Lina Villa
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Comparison of a novel HPV test with the Hybrid Capture II (hcII) and a reference PCR method shows high specificity and positive predictive value for 13 high-risk human papillomavirus infections.

Authors:  Cristina Baleriola; Douglas Millar; John Melki; Neralie Coulston; Phillip Altman; Nikolas Rismanto; William Rawlinson
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Comparison of the SPF10-LiPA system to the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus genotypes among 5,683 young women in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Safaeian; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Wim Quint; Enrique Freer; Leen-Jan Van Doorn; Carolina Porras; Sandra Silva; Paula González; M Concepcion Bratti; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Philip Castle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  14 in total

1.  The 2010 global proficiency study of human papillomavirus genotyping in vaccinology.

Authors:  Carina Eklund; Ola Forslund; Keng-Ling Wallin; Tiequn Zhou; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Kinetics of DNA load predict HPV 16 viral clearance.

Authors:  M Marks; P E Gravitt; U Utaipat; S B Gupta; K Liaw; E Kim; A Tadesse; C Phongnarisorn; V Wootipoom; P Yuenyao; C Vipupinyo; S Rugpao; S Sriplienchan; D D Celentano
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.168

3.  Effect of introducing human papillomavirus genotyping into real-world screening on cervical cancer screening in China: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Binhua Dong; Huachun Zou; Xiaodan Mao; Yingying Su; Hangjing Gao; Fang Xie; Yuchun Lv; Yaojia Chen; Yafang Kang; Huifeng Xue; Diling Pan; Pengming Sun
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  HPV genotype distribution according to severity of cervical neoplasia using the Digene HPV genotyping LQ test.

Authors:  Philippe Halfon; Maria Luisa Mateos Lindemann; Audrey Raimondo; Sophie Ravet; Claire Camus; Hacène Khiri; Guillaume Pénaranda; Mario Sideri; Maria Teresa Sandri
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 5.  Immobilization techniques for microarray: challenges and applications.

Authors:  Satish Balasaheb Nimse; Keumsoo Song; Mukesh Digambar Sonawane; Danishmalik Rafiq Sayyed; Taisun Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Are vaginal swabs comparable to cervical smears for human papillomavirus DNA testing?

Authors:  Liselotte Coorevits; Ans Traen; Luc Bingé; Jo Van Dorpe; Marleen Praet; Jerina Boelens; Elizaveta Padalko
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Estimate of the global burden of cervical adenocarcinoma and potential impact of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Jeanne M Pimenta; Claudia Galindo; David Jenkins; Sylvia M Taylor
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.

Authors:  Aniek Boers; Lorian Slagter-Menkema; Bettien M van Hemel; Jerome L Belinson; Teus Ruitenbeek; Henk J Buikema; Harry Klip; Hilde Ghyssaert; Ate G J van der Zee; Geertruida H de Bock; G Bea A Wisman; Ed Schuuring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of baseline covariates on the immunogenicity of the 9-valent HPV vaccine - A combined analysis of five phase III clinical trials.

Authors:  Lone K Petersen; Jaime Restrepo; Edson D Moreira; Ole-Erik Iversen; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Pierre Van Damme; Elmar A Joura; Sven-Erik Olsson; Daron Ferris; Stan Block; Anna R Giuliano; Xavier Bosch; Sophie Pils; Jack Cuzick; Suzanne M Garland; Warner Huh; Susanne K Kjaer; Oliver M Bautista; Donna Hyatt; Roger Maansson; Erin Moeller; Hong Qi; Christine Roberts; Alain Luxembourg
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2017-03-16

10.  Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of a 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Subgroup Analysis of Participants From Asian Countries.

Authors:  S M Garland; P Pitisuttithum; H Y S Ngan; C-H Cho; C-Y Lee; C-A Chen; Y C Yang; T-Y Chu; N-F Twu; R Samakoses; Y Takeuchi; T H Cheung; S C Kim; L-M Huang; B-G Kim; Y-T Kim; K-H Kim; Y-S Song; S Lalwani; J-H Kang; M Sakamoto; H-S Ryu; N Bhatla; H Yoshikawa; M C Ellison; S R Han; E Moeller; S Murata; M Ritter; M Sawata; C Shields; A Walia; G Perez; A Luxembourg
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.