James W Dearing1, Matthew W Kreuter. 1. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO 80237-8066, USA. james.w.dearing@kp.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The best innovations in cancer communication do not necessarily achieve uptake by researchers, public health and clinical practitioners, and policy makers. This paper describes design activities that can be applied and combined for the purpose of spreading effective cancer communication innovations. METHODS: A previously developed Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model is used to organize and highlight the types of activities that can be deployed during the design phase of innovations. Scientific literature about the diffusion of innovations, knowledge utilization, marketing, public health, and our experiences in working to spread effective practices, programs, and policies are used for this purpose. RESULTS: Attempts to broaden the reach, quicken the uptake, and facilitate the use of cancer communication innovations can apply design activities to increase the likelihood of diffusion. Some simple design activities hold considerable promise for improving dissemination and subsequent diffusion. CONCLUSION: Augmenting current dissemination practices with evidence-based concepts from diffusion science, marketing science, and knowledge utilization hold promise for improving results by eliciting greater market pull. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Inventors and change agencies seeking to spread cancer communication innovations can experience more success by explicit consideration of design activities that reflect an expanded version of the Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model.
OBJECTIVE: The best innovations in cancer communication do not necessarily achieve uptake by researchers, public health and clinical practitioners, and policy makers. This paper describes design activities that can be applied and combined for the purpose of spreading effective cancer communication innovations. METHODS: A previously developed Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model is used to organize and highlight the types of activities that can be deployed during the design phase of innovations. Scientific literature about the diffusion of innovations, knowledge utilization, marketing, public health, and our experiences in working to spread effective practices, programs, and policies are used for this purpose. RESULTS: Attempts to broaden the reach, quicken the uptake, and facilitate the use of cancer communication innovations can apply design activities to increase the likelihood of diffusion. Some simple design activities hold considerable promise for improving dissemination and subsequent diffusion. CONCLUSION: Augmenting current dissemination practices with evidence-based concepts from diffusion science, marketing science, and knowledge utilization hold promise for improving results by eliciting greater market pull. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Inventors and change agencies seeking to spread cancer communication innovations can experience more success by explicit consideration of design activities that reflect an expanded version of the Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model.
Authors: Paula A Keller; Annamaria Feltracco; Linda A Bailey; Zhanhai Li; Jeff Niederdeppe; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Matthew W Kreuter; Celette Sugg Skinner; Karen Steger-May; Cheryl L Holt; Dawn C Bucholtz; Eddie M Clark; Debra Haire-Joshu Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2004 May-Jun
Authors: Matthew W Kreuter; Trent D Buskirk; Kathleen Holmes; Eddie M Clark; Lou Robinson; Xuemei Si; Suchita Rath; Deborah Erwin; Anne Philipneri; Elisia Cohen; Katherine Mathews Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jennifer Leeman; Linda Beeber; Eric Hodges; Shawn Kneipp; Mark Toles; Seon Ae Yeo; Jessica Zègre-Hemsey Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Colleen M McBride; Kristi D Graves; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Caitlin G Allen; Catharine Wang; Elva Arredondo; William M P Klein Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Amy Drahota; Rosemary D Meza; Brigitte Brikho; Meghan Naaf; Jasper A Estabillo; Emily D Gomez; Sarah F Vejnoska; Sarah Dufek; Aubyn C Stahmer; Gregory A Aarons Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Michael J Parks; Marjorie A Margolis; Annie-Laurie McRee; Jason V Terk Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jeremy W Bray; Erin L Kelly; Leslie B Hammer; David M Almeida; James W Dearing; Rosalind B King; Orfeu M Buxton Journal: Methods Rep RTI Press Date: 2013-03