Literature DB >> 21063787

Current management practices for acromegaly: an international survey.

A Giustina1, M D Bronstein, F F Casanueva, P Chanson, E Ghigo, K K Y Ho, A Klibanski, S Lamberts, P Trainer, S Melmed.   

Abstract

To determine whether peer-reviewed consensus statements have changed clinical practice, we surveyed acromegaly care in specialist centers across the globe, and determined the degree of adherence to published consensus guidelines on acromegaly management. Sixty-five acromegaly experts who participated in the 7th Acromegaly Consensus Workshop in March 2009 responded. Results indicated that the most common referring sources for acromegaly patients were other endocrinologists (in 26% of centers), neurosurgeons (25%) and primary care physicians (21%). In sixty-nine percent of patients, biochemical diagnoses were made by evaluating results of a combination of growth hormone (GH) nadir/basal GH and elevated insulin like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. In both Europe and the USA, neurosurgery was the treatment of choice for GH-secreting microadenomas and for macroadenomas with compromised visual function. The most widely used criteria for neurosurgical outcome assessment were combined measurements of IGF-I and GH levels after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3 months after surgery. Ninety-eight percent of respondents stated that primary treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) was indicated at least sometime during the management of acromegaly patients. In nearly all centers (96%), the use of pegvisomant monotherapy was restricted to patients who had failed to achieve biochemical control with SRL therapy. The observation that most centers followed consensus statement recommendations encourages the future utility of these workshops aimed to create uniform management standards for acromegaly. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21063787     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-010-0269-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  34 in total

1.  Basal and glucose-suppressed GH levels less than 1 microg/L in newly diagnosed acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Carlos M Reyes; Abu T Nuruzzaman; Robert E Sundeen; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Consensus statement: medical management of acromegaly.

Authors:  S Melmed; F Casanueva; F Cavagnini; P Chanson; L A Frohman; R Gaillard; E Ghigo; K Ho; P Jaquet; D Kleinberg; S Lamberts; E Laws; G Lombardi; M C Sheppard; M Thorner; M L Vance; J A H Wass; A Giustina
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 3.  Pegvisomant in acromegaly: why, when, how.

Authors:  A Colao; G Arnaldi; P Beck-Peccoz; S Cannavò; R Cozzi; E degli Uberti; L De Marinis; E De Menis; D Ferone; V Gasco; A Giustina; S Grottoli; G Lombardi; P Maffei; E Martino; F Minuto; R Pivonello; E Ghigo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Growth hormone receptor antagonist therapy in acromegalic patients resistant to somatostatin analogs.

Authors:  V S Herman-Bonert; K Zib; J A Scarlett; S Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Epidemiology of acromegaly.

Authors:  I M Holdaway; C Rajasoorya
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  Impact of somatostatin analogs on the heart in acromegaly: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Patrick Maison; Anne-Isabelle Tropeano; Isabelle Macquin-Mavier; Andrea Giustina; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Assessment of the awareness and management of cardiovascular complications of acromegaly in Italy. The COM.E.T.A. (COMorbidities Evaluation and Treatment in Acromegaly) Study.

Authors:  A Giustina; T Mancini; P F Boscani; E de Menis; E degli Uberti; E Ghigo; E Martino; F Minuto; A Colao
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Growth hormone and pituitary radiotherapy, but not serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations, predict excess mortality in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  J Ayuk; R N Clayton; G Holder; M C Sheppard; P M Stewart; A S Bates
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update.

Authors:  S Melmed; A Colao; A Barkan; M Molitch; A B Grossman; D Kleinberg; D Clemmons; P Chanson; E Laws; J Schlechte; M L Vance; K Ho; A Giustina
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  39 in total

1.  ACROSTUDY: the Italian experience.

Authors:  S Grottoli; P Maffei; F Bogazzi; S Cannavò; A Colao; E Ghigo; R Gomez; E Graziano; M Monterubbianesi; P Jonsson; L De Marinis
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Authors:  E Fernandez-Rodriguez; F F Casanueva; I Bernabeu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Expert consensus document: A consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Philippe Chanson; David Kleinberg; Marcello D Bronstein; David R Clemmons; Anne Klibanski; Aart J van der Lely; Christian J Strasburger; Steven W Lamberts; Ken K Y Ho; Felipe F Casanueva; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Optimal use of pegvisomant in acromegaly: are we getting there?

Authors:  Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Somatostatin analog withdrawal in patients with acromegaly: an elusive goal?

Authors:  Moisés Mercado
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Vitamin D-binding protein: one more piece in the puzzle of acromegalic osteopathy?

Authors:  G Mazziotti; F Maffezzoni; A Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Acromegalic osteopathy.

Authors:  G Mazziotti; F Maffezzoni; S Frara; A Giustina
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  High-resolution-cone beam tomography analysis of bone microarchitecture in patients with acromegaly and radiological vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Filippo Maffezzoni; Michele Maddalo; Stefano Frara; Monica Mezzone; Ivan Zorza; Fabio Baruffaldi; Francesco Doglietto; Gherardo Mazziotti; Roberto Maroldi; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Garni Barkhoudarian; Albert Beckers; Anat Ben-Shlomo; Nienke Biermasz; Beverly Biller; Cesar Boguszewski; Marek Bolanowski; Jens Bollerslev; Vivien Bonert; Marcello D Bronstein; Michael Buchfelder; Felipe Casanueva; Philippe Chanson; David Clemmons; Maria Fleseriu; Anna Maria Formenti; Pamela Freda; Monica Gadelha; Eliza Geer; Mark Gurnell; Anthony P Heaney; Ken K Y Ho; Adriana G Ioachimescu; Steven Lamberts; Edward Laws; Marco Losa; Pietro Maffei; Adam Mamelak; Moises Mercado; Mark Molitch; Pietro Mortini; Alberto M Pereira; Stephan Petersenn; Kalmon Post; Manuel Puig-Domingo; Roberto Salvatori; Susan L Samson; Ilan Shimon; Christian Strasburger; Brooke Swearingen; Peter Trainer; Mary L Vance; John Wass; Margaret E Wierman; Kevin C J Yuen; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 10.  Management options for persistent postoperative acromegaly.

Authors:  Nestoras Mathioudakis; Roberto Salvatori
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.