Literature DB >> 21063724

Comparing several equations that predict peak VO2 using the 20-m multistage-shuttle run-test in 8-10-year-old children.

Xavier Melo1, Helena Santa-Clara, José Pedro Almeida, Elvis Alvarez Carnero, Luís Bettencourt Sardinha, Paula Marta Bruno, Bo Fernhall.   

Abstract

This study compared the validity of reported equations as predictors of peak VO(2) in 8-10-year-old children. Participants (90 boys and girls aged 8-10 years) performed the multistage-shuttle-run-test (MSRT) and peak VO(2) was measured in field using a portable gas analyser. The equations that estimated peak VO(2) from the MSRT performance were chosen according to the age range of this study. As follows, the FITNESSGRAM reports and the equations of Leger et al. (Can J Appl Sport Sci 5: 77-84, 1988), Barnett et al. (Pediatr Exerc Sci 5:42-50, 1993), Matsuzaka et al. (Pediatr Exerc Sci 16:113-125, 2004) and Fernhall et al. (Am J Ment Retard 102:602-612, 1998) were used to estimate the peak VO(2) and compared with the directly measured value. The equation of Leger et al. (Can J Appl Sport Sci 5: 77-84, 1988) provided a mean difference (d) of 4.7 ml kg(-1) min(-1) and a 1.0 slope. The equation of Matsuzaka et al. (Pediatr Exerc Sci 16:113-125, 2004)(a) using maximal speed (MS) showed a higher d (5.4) than the remaining using total laps d (4.2). The equation of Barnett et al. (Pediatr Exerc Sci 5:42-50, 1993)(a) that includes triceps skinfold and MS showed the highest d (6.1) but the smallest range (24.1) and slope (0.6). Data from the FITNESSGRAM had the smallest d (1.8 ml kg(-1) min(-1)), but also had the highest range between limits of agreement (28.6 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) and a 1.2 slope. The lowest slope (0.4) and range (22.2 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) were observed using the equation of Fernhall et al. (Am J Ment Retard 102:602-612, 1998). Log transformation of the data revealed that the equations of Matsuzaka et al. (Pediatr Exerc Sci 16:113-125, 2004)(a) (1.1*/÷1.25) and Fernhall et al. (Am J Ment Retard 102:602-612, 1998) (1.17*/÷1.25) showed the closest agreement among all, but they still yield unsatisfactory accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21063724     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1708-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

1.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system.

Authors:  J E McLaughlin; G A King; E T Howley; D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size.

Authors:  A M Nevill; R Ramsbottom; C Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

3.  Respiratory quotient during exercise.

Authors:  B ISSEKUTZ; K RODAHL
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Enhancing the efficacy of the 20 m multistage shuttle run test.

Authors:  A D Flouris; G S Metsios; Y Koutedakis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  The repeatability and criterion related validity of the 20 m multistage fitness test as a predictor of maximal oxygen uptake in active young men.

Authors:  S-M Cooper; J S Baker; R J Tong; E Roberts; M Hanford
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Does the twenty meter shuttle-run test elicit maximal effort in 11- to 16-year-olds?

Authors:  Christine Voss; Gavin Sandercock
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.333

7.  Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science.

Authors:  A M Nevill; G Atkinson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Validation of cardiovascular fitness field tests in children with mental retardation.

Authors:  B Fernhall; K H Pitetti; M D Vukovich; N Stubbs; T Hensen; J P Winnick; F X Short
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1998-05

9.  Evaluation of physical fitness from field tests at high altitude in circumpubertal boys: comparison with laboratory data.

Authors:  G Falgairette; M Bedu; N Fellmann; H Spielvogel; E Van Praagh; P Obert; J Coudert
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

10.  Calf muscle cross-sectional area and peak oxygen uptake and work rate in children and adults.

Authors:  S Zanconato; G Riedy; D M Cooper
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-09
View more
  9 in total

1.  The Cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents in Tibet at altitudes over 3,500 meters.

Authors:  Chaoqun Fan; Ruizhe Sun; Mingjian Nie; Mei Wang; Zhi Yao; Qiang Feng; Wenfeng Xu; Runzi Yuan; Zhongfang Gao; Qiaorui Cheng; Jingjing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Normative Reference Values and International Comparisons for the 20-Metre Shuttle Run Test: Analysis of 69,960 Test Results among Chinese Children and Youth.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Xiaojian Yin; Cunjian Bi; Yuqiang Li; Yi Sun; Ting Zhang; Xiaofang Yang; Ming Li; Yuan Liu; Junfang Cao; Ting Yang; Yaru Guo; Ge Song
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Pre-Adolescent Cardio-Metabolic Associations and Correlates: PACMAC methodology and study protocol.

Authors:  Nicholas Castro; James Faulkner; Paula Skidmore; Michelle Williams; Danielle M Lambrick; Leigh Signal; Michelle Thunders; Diane Muller; Sally Lark; Mike Hamlin; Andrew M Lane; Te Kani Kingi; Lee Stoner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Andersen aerobic fitness test: reliability and validity in 10-year-old children.

Authors:  Eivind Aadland; Torkil Terum; Asgeir Mamen; Lars Bo Andersen; Geir Kåre Resaland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  New 20 m Progressive Shuttle Test Protocol and Equation for Predicting the Maximal Oxygen Uptake of Korean Adolescents Aged 13-18 Years.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Lee; Jung-Ran Song; Yang-Jung Kim; Su-Jin Kim; Hyuk Park; Chang-Sun Kim; Hyo-Bum Kwak; Ju-Hee Kang; Dong-Ho Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Relationship between waist circumference and cardiorespiratory fitness in Chinese children and adolescents: Results from a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Xiaojian Yin; Feng Zhang; Yuqiang Li; Cunjian Bi; Yi Sun; Ming Li; Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.103

7.  Comparison of VO2peak from the Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run (PACER) and treadmill in children.

Authors:  Corey Selland; Matthew D Vukovich; Jessica R Meendering
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.465

8.  Increase in peak oxygen uptake and Andersen test performance in children from age six to ten: The Health Oriented Pedagogical Project (HOPP).

Authors:  Asgeir Mamen; Morten Lindberg; Per Morten Fredriksen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 9.  VALIDITY OF FIELD TESTS TO ESTIMATE CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Mariana Biagi Batista; Catiana Leila Possamai Romanzini; José Castro-Piñero; Enio Ricardo Vaz Ronque
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.