| Literature DB >> 21062827 |
Connie J Hansen1, Lydia Wu, Jeffrey D Fox, Bahram Arezi, Holly H Hogrefe.
Abstract
Using compartmentalized self-replication (CSR), we evolved a version ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21062827 PMCID: PMC3061061 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Key structures. (A)The structure of dCppp-Dabcyl used for CSR enrichment. (B) The DNA (1378–1431 nt) and amino acid (460–477) sequences of the split region in Pfu 4C11. A single dA deletion produces a frameshift termination (TGA) immediately downstream of a ribosome initiation site (ATG) that halts Pfu synthesis at K467.
Figure 2.Split Pfu 4C11. (A) SDS–PAGE analysis of Pfu (lane 1) and Pfu 4C11 (lane 2; subcloned to remove processivity tag). Calculated pI and molecular weight values are 5.9 and 54.5 kDa, respectively, for N-fragment (Pfu 1–467 V93R/A318T) and 9.4 and 35.8 kDa, respectively, for C-fragment (Pfu 468–775 Q484R/V604L/A662V). In (B), the location of the split (M468, Pfu; M489, RB69) and Q484 (Q556, RB69) mutation are indicated in yellow on the Cα backbone structure of the fingers domain. Amino acids 449–499 of Pfu (2JGU_A) are shown in red (38). VAST aligned (39) RB69 segments are shown in light blue as follows: amino acids 473–574 from RB69 1Q9Y_A (40) and amino acids 470–571 from RB69 3CQ8_A (41). DNA strands are shown in brown and dark blue, and nucleotides are shown in yellow.
Figure 3.Reconstitution of PCR activity from individual fragments. (A) SDS–PAGE analysis of Pfu N- and C-fragments that were expressed from separate constructs, purified from inclusion bodies (‘inclusion body preps’), and subject to refolding by dialysis from denaturant (‘refolding reactions’). Refolding reactions were carried out with guanidine-solubilized preparations of N-fragment (‘N’), C-fragment (‘C’), or an equimolar mixture of N- and C-fragments (‘N + C’). Recoveries of soluble folded protein (in similar volumes) were: 1.1 mg/ml ‘N’; ≤0.1 mg/ml ‘C’; and 1 mg/ml ‘N + C’. Split Pfu expressed and purified from clone 4C11 (synthesized from bicistronic mRNA) was run in lane ‘+’. SDS–PAGE samples were prepared from guanidine-containing samples (‘inclusion body preps’) by TCA precipitation. In (B), a 0.9 Kb fragment was amplified in duplicate with the indicated amounts of each refolded protein sample. PCRs (50 µl) were cycled (one cycle of 95°C 2 min; 30 cycles of 95°C 30 s, 58°C 30 s and 72°C 15 s) and then analyzed on a 1% agarose gel. In (C), the refolded N + C sample (‘load’) was further purified by Q- (FT, in flow-through fractions) and SP- (KCl gradient fractions 35, 38, 41, 44, 47) Sepharose chromatography. Under these conditions, N-fragment in the assembled complex passes through the Q column (FT1), while excess (unassociated) N-fragment in the refolded ‘N + C’ sample binds to the anion exchange column. Column fractions were analyzed by SDS–PAGE.
Figure 4.Split plus Q484R mutation required for dCppp-Dabcyl incorporation. A 69 bp β-actin target was amplified as described (‘Materials and Methods’ section) using the following His-tag purified exo- Pfu (non-fusion) enzymes: 1.25 U Pfu or 25 ng Pfu mutant (S, split; Q, Q484R; SQ, split + Q484R; 4C11, V93R/A318T/split/Q484R/V604L/A662V). PCRs contained 50 µM total deoxycytosine nucleotide (dCTP + dCppp-Dabcyl), and percent dCppp-Dabcyl was varied from 0% to 100%. Reactions were monitored in real-time using SYBR Green (B; 0, 95%, and 100% dCppp-Dabcyl reactions), and products generated at cycle 45 were visualized on gels (A).
Polymerase activity measurements
| Polymerase | Specific activity | Steady-state kinetic parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dCTP | dCTP | dCppp-Dabcyl | |||||
| (U/mg) | Kcat/Km (s−1 µM −1) | ||||||
| 166 000 | 23 | 9.2 | 0.4 | nd | nd | nd | |
| 176 000 | 25 | 6.7 | 0.3 | 240 | 8.3 | 0.03 | |
aParameters determined using exo− Pfu or Pfu SQ, and activated calf thymus (specific activity) or primed M13 (kinetic parameters) DNA; kinetic parameters were determined in the presence of fixed (excess) concentrations of dATP, dTTP and dGTP.
bKm [dNTP] value reported for exo− Pfu is 12 µM each dNTP in titrations with equimolar dNTPs (17).
cResults are expressed as the average of duplicate measurements (ranges are <20%).
nd, no detectable incorporation.
Figure 5.Comparison of engineered versus native splits. Locations of naturally-occurring splits in PolB/gp43 from Mth (26), RM378 phage and T4-like phages are indicated on the RB69 gp43 map [adapted from Petrov et al. (25)]. Finger tip structures of T4 phage gp43 have been classified according to number of ORFs as: (i) monocistronic, an uninterrupted fingertip exemplified by T4 and RB69 gp43; or (ii) bicistronic, a split fingertip characteristic of the T4-like phage 133/44R/31/25/65 sub-family (24). Conserved residues (yellow) were used to align the corresponding amino acid sequence of Pfu SQ. Other features are denoted as follows: turquoise, conserved methionine (M) corresponding to translation reinitiation site in Pfu SQ (Pfu M468); red, Q484R mutation in Pfu SQ; grey, α-helices comprising the fingers domain of Pfu [αO extends to E470 in uninterrupted finger; (38)] and RB69 (42).