| Literature DB >> 21062071 |
Brianna Wyn1, Karen A Kidd, Neil M Burgess, R Allen Curry, Kelly R Munkittrick.
Abstract
In the mid-1990s, yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and common loons (Gavia immer) from Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site (KNPNHS), Nova Scotia, Canada, had among the highest mercury (Hg) concentrations across North America. In 2006 and 2007, we re-examined 16 lakes to determine whether there have been changes in Hg in the loon's preferred prey, yellow perch. Total Hg concentrations were measured in up to nine perch in each of three size classes (5-10 cm, 10-15 cm, and 15-20 cm) consumed by loons. Between 1996/97 and 2006/07, polynomial regressions indicated that Hg in yellow perch increased an average of 29% in ten lakes, decreased an average of 21% in three, and were unchanged in the remaining three lakes. In 2006/07, perch in 75% of the study lakes had Hg concentrations (standardized to 12-cm fish length) equal to or above the concentration (0.21 μg·g(-1) ww) associated with a 50% reduction in maximum productivity of loons, compared with only 56% of these lakes in 1996/97. Mercury contamination currently poses a greater threat to loon health than a decade ago, and further reductions in anthropogenic emissions should be considered to reduce its impacts on ecosystem health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21062071 PMCID: PMC2994274 DOI: 10.1021/es1018114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028
Mean (± SD) Body Condition, Age, and Total Mercury Concentrations (THg, raw and standardized) of Yellow Perch Caught in 1996/97 (13) and 2006/07c from 16 Lakes in Kejimkujika,b
| lake | year | condition (g·cm−3) | age (y) | THg (μg·g−1 ww) | 12-cm THg (μg·g−1 ww) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back | 1996 | 9 | 1.11 ± 0.08a | 5.0 ± 2.1 | 0.13 ± 0.06a | 0.12 |
| 2006 | 10 | 1.04 ± 0.08** | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.19*** | |
| Beaverskin | 1996 | 10 | 1.10 ± 0.05a | 3.7 ± 1.3 | 0.19 ± 0.08abc | 0.20 |
| 2006 | 8 | 1.11 ± 0.06 | 4.2 ± 1.9 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.28** | |
| Big Dam East | 1996 | 8 | 1.17 ± 0.08a | 4.6 ± 1.9 | 0.18 ± 0.08abc | 0.18 |
| 2006 | 8 | 1.06 ± 0.04*** | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.25* | |
| Big Dam West | 1996 | 7 | 1.31 ± 0.07b | 5.4 ± 2.4 | 0.21 ± 0.10 abc | 0.27 |
| 2006 | 8 | 1.25 ± 0.06* | 4.8 ± 2.1 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.24* | |
| Big Red | 1996 | 6 | 1.20 ± 0.13a | 6.8 ± 2.1 | 0.53 ± 0.14abc | 0.41 |
| 2006 | 7 | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 0.47 ± 0.12 | 0.41 | |
| Cobrielle | 1996 | 6 | 1.16 ± 0.07a | 5.2 ± 1.2 | 0.26 ± 0.07abc | 0.20 |
| 2006 | 6 | 1.10 ± 0.07 | 4.7 ± 0.8 | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 0.25* | |
| Frozen Ocean | 1996 | 9 | 1.30 ± 0.12b | 5.8 ± 2.3 | 0.26 ± 0.16abc | 0.24 |
| 2006 | 9 | 1.20 ± 0.08** | 4.8 ± 2.4 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 0.22 | |
| Kejimkujik | 1996 | 23 | 1.16 ± 0.09a | 5.2 ± 2.3 | 0.28 ± 0.10bc | 0.30 |
| 2006 | 26 | 1.21 ± 0.14 | 5.3 ± 2.3 | 0.32 ± 0.14 | 0.29 | |
| Loon | 1996 | 9 | 1.20 ± 0.05a | 6.1 ± 2.0 | 0.26 ± 0.11abc | 0.22 |
| 2006 | 9 | 1.16 ± 0.09 | 3.7 ± 1.8* | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 0.30* | |
| Mountain | 1996 | 8 | 1.17 ± 0.07a | 5.1 ± 2.5 | 0.22 ± 0.12abc | 0.19 |
| 2006 | 9 | 1.09 ± 0.07* | 2.7 ± 1.7* | 0.21 ± 0.11 | 0.21* (0.20) | |
| North | 1996 | 9 | 1.09 ± 0.06a | 5.4 ± 2.2 | 0.37 ± 0.14c | 0.30 |
| Cranberry | 2006 | 9 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 5.6 ± 2.5 | 0.49 ± 0.24 | 0.36* |
| Pebbleloggitch | 1996 | 9 | 1.16 ± 0.09a | 5.2 ± 2.2 | 0.16 ± 0.04ab | 0.19 |
| 2006 | 9 | 1.14 ± 0.04 | 4.3 ± 1.2 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.22* (0.19) | |
| Peskawa | 1996 | 20 | 1.18 ± 0.08a | 4.4 ± 2.0 | 0.24 ± 0.13abc | 0.28 |
| 2006 | 27 | 1.20 ± 0.13 | 5.2 ± 2.6 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0.24* | |
| Peskowesk | 1996 | 8 | 1.13 ± 0.06a | 5.1 ± 2.1 | 0.28 ± 0.16abc | 0.21 |
| 2006 | 10 | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 5.0 ± 2.4 | 0.36 ± 0.17 | 0.27* | |
| Puzzle | 1996 | 8 | 1.08 ± 0.06a | 4.9 ± 2.4 | 0.23 ± 0.10abc | 0.25 |
| 2006 | 9 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 5.5 ± 2.6 | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 0.29** | |
| Upper Silver | 1996 | 7 | 1.08 ± 0.08a | 3.7 ± 1.5 | 0.14 ± 0.06a | 0.19 |
| 2006 | 10 | 1.08 ± 0.06 | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.12* |
Asterisks represent statistical within-lake differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, t-tests, ANCOVA, or polynomial regression) between years.
Letters represent statistical differences (ANOVA) among lakes within each period.
2006/07 data mathematically pooled except in Kejimkujik and Peskawa lakes; see Methods for details.
Values in brackets had outliers removed.
Figure 1Mean THg concentrations of three size classes (5−10, 10−15, and 15−20 cm) of yellow perch captured in 16 lakes in Kejimkujik in 1996/97 and 2006/07. The 1:1 line is shown.
Figure 2Percent change (2006/2007 compared to 1996/1997) of standardized THg concentrations in yellow perch captured in 15 lakes in Kejimkujik versus (a) pH; (b) TOC of the lakes as measured in 2005−2007 (open symbol indicates an outlier, Upper Silver Lake, excluded from the regressions).