Literature DB >> 21061113

[Stoma creation during low anterior resection: the cons].

M S Kasparek1, K-W Jauch.   

Abstract

Creation of a protective stoma is nowadays considered the standard of care in patients undergoing low rectal resection to protect these patients from the potentially hazardous consequences of an anastomotic leak. This appears reasonable in patients with acknowledged risk factors such as male gender, low anastomosis, preoperative radiochemotherapy, intraoperative complications, or steroid treatment to ensure patients' safety. However, from our view, it is debatable, if patients without these risk factors can undergo low rectal resection without a stoma. This approach can prevent patients form potential risks of stoma creation as well as closure and the associated readmission to the hospital. Based on reliable patient selection, avoiding a protective stoma during low rectal resection can increase patients' satisfaction and decrease primary and secondary medical costs. However, this approach is hampered by the lack of evidence for patient selection, leading to legal concerns that justify this approach only in highly motivated patients after detailed counseling of the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21061113     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-010-1929-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  39 in total

1.  Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown.

Authors:  P T Phang; J M Hain; J J Perez-Ramirez; R D Madoff; B T Gemlo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor.

Authors:  Alexis B Ulrich; Christoph Seiler; Nuh Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy.

Authors:  A W Gooszen; R H Geelkerken; J Hermans; M B Lagaay; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Quality of life in stoma patients.

Authors:  K P Nugent; P Daniels; B Stewart; R Patankar; C D Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Scott Cassie; Anthony R MacLean; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy.

Authors:  G F Giannakopoulos; A A F A Veenhof; D L van der Peet; C Sietses; W J H J Meijerink; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Personality rather than clinical variables determines quality of life after major colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Michael Siassi; Maren Weiss; Werner Hohenberger; Friedrich Lösel; Klaus Matzel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Quality of life and patient's expectations after closure of a temporary stoma.

Authors:  Michael Siassi; Werner Hohenberger; Friedrich Lösel; Maren Weiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Definitive risk factors for anastomotic leaks in elective open colorectal resection.

Authors:  Paul Suding; Erin Jensen; Murray A Abramson; Kamal Itani; Samuel Eric Wilson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09

10.  Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: the impact of fibrin glue.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.