Literature DB >> 21061075

Impact of progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical management of breast cancer.

Abigail S Caudle1, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, Kelly K Hunt, Lajos Pusztai, Henry M Kuerer, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Funda Meric-Bernstam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is standard therapy for locally advanced breast cancer, it remains controversial for early-stage disease due to concerns that disease progression may make breast-conservation therapy (BCT), or even operability, impossible. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of disease progression during NCT on surgical management.
METHODS: We reviewed clinicopathological data on patients who received NCT for stage I-III breast cancer from 1994 to 2007. Chemotherapy regimens were anthracycline-and/or taxane-based as determined by the treating medical oncologist.
RESULTS: Of 1,928 patients who received NCT, 1,762 (91%) had a partial or complete response, 107 (6%) had stable disease (SD), and 59 (3%) progressed (PD) while receiving at least one regimen. Of the patients with progressive disease, 40 (68%) patients underwent mastectomy, 12 (20%) underwent BCT, and 7 (12%) did not undergo surgery. In patients who underwent mastectomy, only three (8%) were BCT candidates before progression. Overall, disease progression changed the operative plan in 11 (0.5%) patients: 3 developed distant metastasis, 2 developed clinical lymphadenopathy, 3 required mastectomy instead of BCT, 2 became inoperable, and 1 required flap closure.
CONCLUSIONS: Disease progression while receiving NCT is infrequent (3%), but early identification may allow for change to other, potentially beneficial, therapeutic interventions. Patients with breast cancer who receive NCT should be evaluated frequently for response to therapy. Overall, progression during NCT changes the surgical management in a small proportion of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21061075      PMCID: PMC4347926          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1390-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  14 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma may not improve rates of breast conservation.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Jamie Wagner; Betsy J Garrett; Lori Harker; Lavinia P Middleton; Gildy V Babiera; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anthony Lucci; Kelly K Hunt; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Predictors of tumor progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Kelly K Hunt; Ping Liu; Lajos Pusztai; W Fraser Symmans; Henry M Kuerer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Florentia Peintinger; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; S E Singletary; Isabelle Bedrosian; Anthony Lucci; Aman U Buzdar; Lajos Pusztai; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Bryant; N Wolmark; E Mamounas; A Brown; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Begovic; A DeCillis; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov; H D Bear
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Emerging biomarkers and new understanding of traditional markers in personalized therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Anita K Dunbier
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Preoperative chemotherapy is safe in early breast cancer, even after 10 years of follow-up; clinical and translational results from the EORTC trial 10902.

Authors:  Johanna G H van Nes; Hein Putter; Jean-Pierre Julien; Michelle Tubiana-Hulin; Marc van de Vijver; Jan Bogaerts; Monika de Vos; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Preoperative chemotherapy decreases the need for re-excision of breast cancers between 2 and 4 cm diameter.

Authors:  Carla J Christy; David Thorsteinsson; Baiba J Grube; Dalliah Black; Maysa Abu-Khalaf; Gina G Chung; Michael P DiGiovanna; Kenneth Miller; Susan A Higgins; Joanne Weidhaas; Lyndsay Harris; Fattaneh A Tavassoli; Donald R Lannin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome.

Authors:  I F Faneyte; J G Schrama; J L Peterse; P L Remijnse; S Rodenhuis; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Raphael Richard; Isabelle Thomassin; Marion Chapellier; Aurélie Scemama; Patricia de Cremoux; Mariana Varna; Sylvie Giacchetti; Marc Espié; Eric de Kerviler; Cedric de Bazelaire
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Disease-Free and Overall Survival Among Patients With Operable HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Sequential vs Concurrent Chemotherapy: The ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Aman U Buzdar; Vera J Suman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ann Marilyn Leitch; Matthew J Ellis; Judy C Boughey; Gary W Unzeitig; Melanie E Royce; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  The treatment option of progressive disease in breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Yurong Zheng; Xiaowen Ding; Dehong Zou; Fanrong Zhang; Chengdong Qin; Hongjian Yang; Wenju Mo; Yuqin Ding; Yang Yu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with special histology subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Giugliano; J Uliano; V A A Zia; D Trapani; A Marra; G Viale; E Ferraro; A Esposito; C Criscitiello; P D'amico; G Curigliano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Rob van Bommel; Adri C Voogd; Marieke W Louwman; Luc J Strobbe; Dick Venderink; Lucien E M Duijm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Surgical patterns of care in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast magnetic resonance imaging: results of a secondary analysis of TBCRC 017.

Authors:  Kandace P McGuire; E Shelley Hwang; Alan Cantor; Mehra Golshan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Janet K Horton; Rita Nanda; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Cliff A Hudis; Ingrid Meszoely; Jennifer F De Los Santos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Using a New Marker Clip System in Breast Cancer: Tumark Vision® Clip - Feasibility Testing in Everyday Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Anna Marlene Rüland; Friederike Hagemann; Mattea Reinisch; Johannes Holtschmidt; Aylin Kümmel; Christine Dittmer-Grabowski; Frank Stöblen; Horst Rotthaus; Volker Dreesmann; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Sherko Kümmel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Efficiency of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to predict prognosis in breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Ishiba; Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Takanobu Sato; Makoto Nagahara; Goshi Oda; Hitoshi Sugimoto; Mai Kasahara; Tokuko Hosoya; Kazunori Kubota; Tomoyuki Fujioka; Peter Danenberg; Kathleen Danenberg; Hiroyuki Uetake
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-24

9.  Neoadjuvant eribulin in HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer (SOLTI-1007-NeoEribulin): a multicenter, two-cohort, non-randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  Tomás Pascual; Mafalda Oliveira; Patricia Villagrasa; Vanesa Ortega; Laia Paré; Begoña Bermejo; Serafín Morales; Kepa Amillano; Rafael López; Patricia Galván; Jordi Canes; Fernando Salvador; Paolo Nuciforo; Isabel T Rubio; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Serena Di Cosimo; José Baselga; Nadia Harbeck; Aleix Prat; Javier Cortés
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-11-25

10.  Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response by exploiting a transfer learning approach on breast DCE-MRIs.

Authors:  Maria Colomba Comes; Annarita Fanizzi; Samantha Bove; Vittorio Didonna; Sergio Diotaiuti; Daniele La Forgia; Agnese Latorre; Eugenio Martinelli; Arianna Mencattini; Annalisa Nardone; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Cosmo Maurizio Ressa; Pasquale Tamborra; Vito Lorusso; Raffaella Massafra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.