Literature DB >> 18484198

Preoperative chemotherapy is safe in early breast cancer, even after 10 years of follow-up; clinical and translational results from the EORTC trial 10902.

Johanna G H van Nes1, Hein Putter, Jean-Pierre Julien, Michelle Tubiana-Hulin, Marc van de Vijver, Jan Bogaerts, Monika de Vos, Cornelis J H van de Velde.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer (POCOB) study was designed to compare preoperative with postoperative chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer concerning breast conserving therapy (BCT) procedures, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
METHODS: Patients (n = 698) with early breast cancer were enrolled between 1991 and 1999 and randomized between preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy (four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Endpoints were BCT procedures, DFS, OS, and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy. In addition, tumor tissue was collected for translational research and the following markers were examined: ER, PgR, HER2, p21, p53, and bcl-2 expression.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 10 years, there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms for OS (HR = 1.09; 95%CI 0.83-1.42; P = 0.54), DFS (HR = 1.12; 95%CI 0.90-1.39; P = 0.30), or locoregional recurrences (LRR, HR = 1.16; 95%CI 0.77-1.74). Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with an increase in BCT rates. BCT in part feasible due to tumor downsizing after preoperative chemotherapy was not correlated with higher LRR or worse OS compared to BCT which was feasible without downsizing of the tumor. Using available tumor material, only tumor stage, nodal stage, and grade were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy does not result in a difference in OS or DFS compared to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. Moreover, it increases BCT rates with no significant increase of LRR. This implies that preoperative chemotherapy is a safe procedure for patients with early breast cancer, even after a follow-up period of 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484198     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0050-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  27 in total

1.  Pathological complete response in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: The natural history of an elusive prognosticator.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Iheoma Nwaogu; Donna B Jeffe; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 2.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Locoregional therapy of locally advanced breast cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  M Brackstone; G G Fletcher; I S Dayes; Y Madarnas; S K SenGupta; S Verma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Treatment response assessment of breast masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scans using fuzzy c-means clustering and level set segmentation.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark Helvie; Thomas Chenevert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Christine M Weeks; Haejin In; Christopher M Dodgion; Mehra Golshan; Yoon S Chun; Michael J Hassett; Katherine A Corso; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Impact of progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Kelly K Hunt; Lajos Pusztai; Henry M Kuerer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Oriana A Petruolo; Melissa Pilewskie; Sujata Patil; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Primary medical therapy and breast conservation treatment: the medical oncology perspective.

Authors:  Nan Soon Wong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

9.  The Clinical Significance of Breast-only and Node-only Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT): A Review of 20,000 Breast Cancer Patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Yi Ren; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Nina Tamirisa; Jeremy Force; Judy C Boughey; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathological axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients with clinically positive axillary lymph nodes at presentation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takei; Takashi Yoshida; Masafumi Kurosumi; Kenichi Inoue; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Yuji Hayashi; Toru Higuchi; Sayaka Uchida; Jun Ninomiya; Kazuyuki Kubo; Hanako Oba; Shigenori Nagai; Toshio Tabei
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.