| Literature DB >> 21061048 |
N S H Tien1, M W Sabelis, M Egas.
Abstract
Dispersal to new hosts is an important process for an invasive herbivore, such as the two-spotted spider mite. A recent study, using artificial selection experiments, has suggested that genetic variation and genetic trade-offs are present for propensity to disperse in this species. However, due to the experimental setup alternative explanations for the response to selection could not be ruled out. Using an altered setup, we investigated whether the propensity for ambulatory dispersal differs genetically between individuals and whether genetic correlations with life-history traits exist. Upward and downward selection on propensity to leave the colony was performed for seven generations in four replicate artificial selection experiments and the results were compared to control lines. No consistent responses to selection were found and no significant effect on life-history traits (oviposition rate, juvenile survival, development rate and number of adult offspring) or sex ratio was present across the replicates. The data suggest that our base population of spider mites harbours at best a low amount of additive genetic variation for this behaviour.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21061048 PMCID: PMC3040828 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-010-9411-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Appl Acarol ISSN: 0168-8162 Impact factor: 2.132
The ultimate fraction of dispersers (group dispersal index)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Control | Low | High | Control | Low | High | Control | Low | High | Control | Low | |
| Frac disp | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| SE | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
|
| 23 | 24 | 22 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Time | 70 | 67 | 67 | 65 | ||||||||
| Stat |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| high vs. control: | low vs. control: | |||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||
Dispersal was measured as fraction females that migrated away from the colony, out of an initial colony of ten females. Upward selected (“high”) and downward selected (“low”) lines and the control lines (“control”) of the four replicates (1–4). Frac disp mean fraction of dispersers, SE standard error of the mean, N sample size, Time number of hours since start of the experiment, after which the fraction dispersers was determined, Stat outcome of statistical analysis: P model the P value derived from comparing the generalized linear models with and without treatment as explanatory factor. z and P refer to the z value and it’s P value of the post-hoc contrasts between a selection line and its control line
Fig. 1Fraction dispersing females over time (group dispersal index). Upward selected (black circles and straight black line) and downward selected (white circles and dashed line) lines and the control lines (grey circles and grey line) of the four replicates (1–4). Dispersal was measured as fraction females that migrated away from the leaf disc, out of an initial colony of ten females. Error bars are standard errors of the mean
Fig. 2Fraction of females that dispersed within 30 min, relative to the total number of dispersing females (individual dispersal index). Both selection treatments (high/low) were compared to their control line within replicates (1–4); *P < 0.05. Numbers under the treatments depict the total number of dispersing females. Total number of examined females (including non-dispersers) was 18 per line
Descriptive statistics of life-history traits and sex ratio of the twelve experimental lines of Tetranychus urticae
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Control | Low | High | Control | Low | High | Control | Low | High | Control | Low | |
| Oviposition rate | 11.58 | 10.52 | 10.84 | 10.92 | 10.87 | 10.00 | 10.52 | 10.71 | 10.36 | 9.58 | 9.78 | 9.87 |
| Development rate | 4.77 | 4.75 | 4.51 | 4.68 | 4.77 | 4.68 | 4.94 | 4.78 | 4.62 | 3.99 | 4.23 | 3.90 |
| Juvenile survival | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.79 |
| 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.83 |
| Adult offspring | 10.42 | 9.48 | 9.32 | 9.48 | 9.48 | 7.96 | 9.35 | 8.96 | 9.00 | 7.16 | 7.88 | 8.30 |
| Sex ratio | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.21 |
| 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| Sample size | 24 | 23 | 25 | 25 | 23 | 24 | 23 | 24 | 22 | 25 | 24 | 23 |
(1–4) represent the replicates; (high/control/low) represent the selection treatment. Oviposition rate number of eggs laid in 24 h, development rate index for the average development stage at a certain age, juvenile survival fraction offspring that survived to adulthood, adult offspring number of adult offspring out of the eggs laid in 24 h, sex ratio fraction males in the adult offspring. Numbers depicted are averages and their standard errors (in brackets underneath). Lines with significant differences from their control line are depicted in bold with (*) for P < 0.05. Also the sample size per experimental line is depicted