| Literature DB >> 21060297 |
Liang Feng1, Xiao-Bin Jia, Jun Jiang, Mao-Mao Zhu, Yan Chen, Xiao-Bin Tan, Feng Shi.
Abstract
The efficacy of Prunella extracts in the prevention and treatment of lung cancer has been attributed to different components. In this study, an "active components combination model" hypothesis was proposed to explain the anti-tumor activity of Prunella. The efficacy of Prunella extracts from different regions was compared in vitro and in vivo, and the TNF-α activity in serum of tumor-bearing mice was also evaluated. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to analyze the extracts and identify 26 common peaks. Prunella samples from different regions were classified by the cluster analysis method; both P. vulgaris L. from Bozhou and P. asiatica Nakai from Nanjing, which had the highest activities, were further divided into different classes. Six peaks from the HPLC analysis were very similar, and were identified as caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, rutin, quercetin, oleanolic acid and ursolic acid. The total ratio of these compounds in Prunella from Bozhou and Nanjing were 1.0:14.7:3.9:1.0:4.4:1.4 and 1.0:14.8:4.0:0.8:5.6:1.8, respectively. Total triterpenes and total phenols in Prunella were separated by macroporous resin purification for activity studies. The results showed that total triterpenes and total phenols had anti-lung cancer activity and their combination significantly enhanced the activity. In addition, the combination also significantly increased the TNF-α content compared to total triterpenes or total phenols. The results indicated that the efficacy of Prunella against lung cancer was attributable to multiple components acting at an optimal ratio.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21060297 PMCID: PMC6259190 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15117893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Proliferation inhibition activity of Prunella from different regions on A549 and SPC-A-1 cells.
Figure 2Inhibition activity on lung cancer in vivo.
Figure 3Standard curve of TNF-α.
Figure 4Comparison of TNF-α content in serum of tumor-bearing mice.
Figure 5HPLC chromatograms of PV extracts of different Prunella samples from different regions.
Peak area comparison of the 26 compounds in Prunella from different regions.
| Peak No. | Suizhou | Guiyang | Zhangshu | Bozhou | Nanning | Guanghan | Tongbai | Nanjing | Zhejiang |
| 1 | 153.8 | 374.2 | 268.8 | 227.8 | 168.7 | 305.1 | 148.0 | 91.4 | 247.0 |
| 2 | 83.6 | 125.5 | 478.4 | 303.9 | 109.4 | 155.7 | 102.7 | 38.4 | 76.1 |
| 3 | 252.6 | 808.1 | 469.8 | 423.9 | 276.1 | 388.9 | 174.2 | 197.1 | 336.1 |
| 4 | 69.1 | 163.4 | 150.7 | 82.2 | 100.4 | 126.3 | 58.7 | 54.0 | 43.1 |
| 5 | 151.9 | 1535.2 | 123.4 | 89.5 | 44.6 | 85.8 | 78.3 | 74.4 | 162.8 |
| 6 | 488.5 | 1905.8 | 1780.2 | 1648.6 | 864.9 | 1374.8 | 694.2 | 341.4 | 961.2 |
| 7 | 59.4 | 83.2 | 210.7 | 149.9 | 154.7 | 160.3 | 78.1 | 66.9 | 63.7 |
| 8 | 139.6 | 408.1 | 174.4 | 117.2 | 217.4 | 212.7 | 101.9 | 182.0 | 182.1 |
| 9 | 79.6 | 69.9 | 126.3 | 114.2 | 181.1 | 142.2 | 37.4 | 103.7 | 87.9 |
| 10 | 249.2 | 414.4 | 489.5 | 386.5 | 466.2 | 483.9 | 227.6 | 446.2 | 413 |
| 11 | 63.3 | 93.9 | 252.8 | 148.9 | 201.6 | 194.8 | 248.3 | 148.3 | 99.5 |
| 12 | 125.7 | 20.2 | 56.8 | 150.4 | 66.3 | 41.7 | 22.4 | 21.4 | 16.0 |
| 13 | 87.6 | 351.9 | 170.8 | 164.2 | 110.5 | 28.3 | 129.4 | 73.7 | 124.0 |
| 14 | 102.9 | 98.3 | 149.8 | 143.9 | 55.5 | 104.5 | 97.2 | 68.3 | 68.8 |
| 15 | 145.5 | 566.7 | 688.3 | 623.2 | 292.5 | 819.9 | 526.0 | 434.6 | 617.4 |
| 16 | 200.3 | 410.5 | 2725.8 | 1558.5 | 1901.3 | 1275.9 | 1399.5 | 1567.9 | 1056.4 |
| 17 | 0.00 | 54.8 | 496.3 | 82.7 | 224.6 | 114.2 | 189.4 | 84.9 | 52.6 |
| 18 | 57.6 | 87.8 | 635.3 | 106.2 | 213.6 | 186.2 | 91.5 | 90.4 | 106.2 |
| 19 | 230.9 | 1178.5 | 1221.6 | 1569.1 | 723.7 | 1166.4 | 461.4 | 193.2 | 814.5 |
| 20 | 35.9 | 45.3 | 46.6 | 59.1 | 42.6 | 46.8 | 38.1 | 47.8 | 32.5 |
| 21 | 207.9 | 648.2 | 284.8 | 260 | 155 | 497.8 | 440.7 | 149.8 | 211.8 |
| 22 | 220.5 | 352.6 | 277.1 | 187.8 | 175.2 | 267.8 | 377.8 | 175.3 | 173.5 |
| 23 | 117.4 | 472.7 | 315.8 | 314.7 | 273 | 383.5 | 468.2 | 302.6 | 259.8 |
| 24 | 70.1 | 182.6 | 262.7 | 601.2 | 118.7 | 223.8 | 103.2 | 51.9 | 146 |
| 25 | 1219.9 | 1236.1 | 911.7 | 901.6 | 725.2 | 2093.5 | 805.4 | 1110.7 | 1174.1 |
| 26 | 3417.8 | 3426.1 | 2559.3 | 2452.7 | 2061.8 | 5813.9 | 3465.5 | 3035.8 | 3394.6 |
The all data were taken from three individual experiments and expressed Table 2 as the mean.
Contents of six compounds in Prunella spp. and their ratios (mg/g).
| Regions | Species | Caffeic acid | Rosmarinic acid | Rutin | Quercetin | Ursolic acid | Oleanolic acid | Ratio |
| Suizhou | 0.04 | 0.17 | _ | 0.05 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 1.0 | |
| Guiyang | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 1.0 | |
| Zhangshu | 0.15 | 2.31 | 2.12 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.13 | 1.0 | |
| Bozhou | 0.09 | 1.32 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 1.0 | |
| Nanning | 0.12 | 1.61 | 0.96 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 1.0 | |
| Guanghan | 0.11 | 1.18 | 0.49 | 0.15 | 0.95 | 0.30 | 1.0 | |
| Tongbai | 0.14 | 1.19 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.12 | 1.0 | |
| Nanjing | 0.09 | 1.33 | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 1.0 | |
| Wenzhou | 0.06 | 0.90 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.95 | 0.17 | 1.0 |
“-” Not detected. The regression equation and correlation coefficients of caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, rutin, quercetin, ursolic acid and oleanolic acid were Y = 28563X-4.5, R = 1.000;Y = 12569X - 8.1, R = 1.000; Y = 4690X- 5.5, R = 0.9999; Y = 24347X + 4.1, R = 0.9998; Y = 5485.7X - 11.2, R = 0.9994; Y = 6106.4X + 17.4, R = 0.9996, respectively. The all data were taken from three individual experiments and expressed as the mean.
Figure 6Pedigree chart cluster of Prunella.
Figure 7Inhibition ratio of components and its combination on SPC-A-1 cells.
Figure 8Effect of components and components combination on tumor weight of mices.
Figure 9Effect of components and components combination on tumor control ratio of tumor-bearing mice.
Figure 10Effect of components and components combination on TNF-α content in serum of tumor-bearing mice.