Literature DB >> 21057138

Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score.

Mikhail M Savitski1, Simone Lemeer, Markus Boesche, Manja Lang, Toby Mathieson, Marcus Bantscheff, Bernhard Kuster.   

Abstract

Large scale phosphorylation analysis is more and more getting into focus of proteomic research. Although it is now possible to identify thousands of phosphorylated peptides in a biological system, confident site localization remains challenging. Here we validate the Mascot Delta Score (MD-score) as a simple method that achieves similar sensitivity and specificity for phosphosite localization as the published Ascore, which is mainly used in conjunction with Sequest. The MD-score was evaluated using liquid chromatography-tandem MS data of 180 individually synthesized phosphopeptides with precisely known phosphorylation sites. We tested the MD-score for a wide range of commonly available fragmentation methods and found it to be applicable throughout with high statistical significance. However, the different fragmentation techniques differ strongly in their ability to localize phosphorylation sites. At 1% false localization rate, the highest number of correctly assigned phosphopeptides was achieved by higher energy collision induced dissociation in combination with an Orbitrap mass analyzer followed very closely by low resolution ion trap spectra obtained after electron transfer dissociation. Both these methods are significantly better than low resolution spectra acquired after collision induced dissociation and multi stage activation. Score thresholds determined from simple calibration functions for each fragmentation method were stable over replicate analyses of the phosphopeptide set. The MD-score outperforms the Ascore for tyrosine phosphorylated peptides and we further show that the ability to call sites correctly increases with increasing distance of two candidate sites within a peptide sequence. The MD-score does not require complex computational steps which makes it attractive in terms of practical utility. We provide all mass spectra and the synthetic peptides to the community so that the development of present and future localization software can be benchmarked and any laboratory can determine MD-scores and localization probabilities for their individual analytical set up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21057138      PMCID: PMC3033680          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M110.003830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  36 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of site assignments in CID and electron transfer dissociation spectra of phosphopeptides discloses limited relocation of phosphate groups.

Authors:  Nikolai Mischerikow; A F Maarten Altelaar; J Daniel Navarro; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides.

Authors:  Tine E Thingholm; Ole N Jensen; Phillip J Robinson; Martin R Larsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Manual validation of peptide sequence and sites of tyrosine phosphorylation from MS/MS spectra.

Authors:  Amy M Nichols; Forest M White
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

4.  PhosphoScore: an open-source phosphorylation site assignment tool for MSn data.

Authors:  Brian E Ruttenberg; Trairak Pisitkun; Mark A Knepper; Jason D Hoffert
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Alejandro Wolf-Yadlin; Phillip L Ross; Darryl J Pappin; John Rush; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Forest M White
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Gas-phase rearrangements do not affect site localization reliability in phosphoproteomics data sets.

Authors:  Mike Aguiar; Wilhelm Haas; Sean A Beausoleil; John Rush; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Blagoy Blagoev; Florian Gnad; Boris Macek; Chanchal Kumar; Peter Mortensen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Comparison of MS(2)-only, MSA, and MS(2)/MS(3) methodologies for phosphopeptide identification.

Authors:  Peter J Ulintz; Anastasia K Yocum; Bernd Bodenmiller; Ruedi Aebersold; Philip C Andrews; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns.

Authors:  Martijn W H Pinkse; Pauliina M Uitto; Martijn J Hilhorst; Bert Ooms; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Gas-phase intramolecular phosphate shift in phosphotyrosine-containing peptide monoanions.

Authors:  Marina Edelson-Averbukh; Andrej Shevchenko; Rüdiger Pipkorn; Wolf D Lehmann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  104 in total

Review 1.  Modification site localization scoring: strategies and performance.

Authors:  Robert J Chalkley; Karl R Clauser
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Modulation of protein phosphorylation, N-glycosylation and Lys-acetylation in grape (Vitis vinifera) mesocarp and exocarp owing to Lobesia botrana infection.

Authors:  Marcella N Melo-Braga; Thiago Verano-Braga; Ileana R León; Donato Antonacci; Fábio C S Nogueira; Jay J Thelen; Martin R Larsen; Giuseppe Palmisano
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Proteomic profiling of nuclear fractions from native renal inner medullary collecting duct cells.

Authors:  Christina M Pickering; Cameron Grady; Barbara Medvar; Milad Emamian; Pablo C Sandoval; Yue Zhao; Chin-Rang Yang; Hyun Jun Jung; Chung-Lin Chou; Mark A Knepper
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 4.  Recent advances in enrichment and separation strategies for mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Chenxi Yang; Xuefei Zhong; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Phosphorylation of ORF1p is required for L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Pamela R Cook; Charles E Jones; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry with alternate fragmentation modes.

Authors:  Adrian Guthals; Nuno Bandeira
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  LuciPHOr: algorithm for phosphorylation site localization with false localization rate estimation using modified target-decoy approach.

Authors:  Damian Fermin; Scott J Walmsley; Anne-Claude Gingras; Hyungwon Choi; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Comprehensive quantitative comparison of the membrane proteome, phosphoproteome, and sialiome of human embryonic and neural stem cells.

Authors:  Marcella Nunes Melo-Braga; Melanie Schulz; Qiuyue Liu; Andrzej Swistowski; Giuseppe Palmisano; Kasper Engholm-Keller; Lene Jakobsen; Xianmin Zeng; Martin Røssel Larsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Comprehensive mass spectrometric mapping of the hydroxylated amino acid residues of the α1(V) collagen chain.

Authors:  Chenxi Yang; Arick C Park; Nicholas A Davis; Jason D Russell; Byoungjae Kim; David D Brand; Matthew J Lawrence; Ying Ge; Michael S Westphall; Joshua J Coon; Daniel S Greenspan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Solid-phase capture for the detection and relative quantification of S-nitrosoproteins by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J Will Thompson; Michael T Forrester; M Arthur Moseley; Matthew W Foster
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.