Literature DB >> 12204871

Severe community-acquired pneumonia: use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society Diagnostic criteria.

Derek C Angus1, Thomas J Marrie, D Scott Obrosky, Gilles Clermont, Tony T Dremsizov, Christopher Coley, Michael J Fine, Daniel E Singer, Wishwa N Kapoor.   

Abstract

Despite careful evaluation of changes in hospital care for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), little is known about intensive care unit (ICU) use in the treatment of this disease. There are criteria that define CAP as "severe," but evaluation of their predictive value is limited. We compared characteristics, course, and outcome of inpatients who did (n = 170) and did not (n = 1,169) receive ICU care in the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team prospective cohort. We also assessed the predictive characteristics of four prediction rules (the original and revised American Thoracic Society criteria, the British Thoracic Society criteria, and the Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI]) for ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, medical complications, and death (as proxies for severe CAP). ICU patients were more likely to be admitted from home and had more comorbid conditions. Reasons for ICU admission included respiratory failure (57%), hemodynamic monitoring (32%), and shock (16%). ICU patients incurred longer hospital stays (23.2 vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.001), higher hospital costs (21,144 dollars vs. 5,785 dollars, p < 0.001), more nonpulmonary organ dysfunction, and higher hospital mortality (18.2 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Although ICU patients were sicker, 27% were of low risk (PSI Risk Classes I-III). Severity-adjusted ICU admission rates varied across institutions, but mechanical ventilation rates did not. The revised American Thoracic Society criteria rule was the best discriminator of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively) but none of the prediction rules were particularly good. The PSI was the best predictor of medical complications and death (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65 and 0.75, respectively), but again, none of the prediction rules were particularly good. In conclusion, ICU use for CAP is common and expensive but admission rates are variable. Clinical prediction rules for severe CAP do not appear adequately robust to guide clinical care at the current time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12204871     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2102084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  60 in total

1.  Reorganising the pandemic triage processes to ethically maximise individuals' best interests.

Authors:  Andrew Tillyard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Towards a sensible comprehension of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Santiago Ewig; Mark Woodhead; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Lionel A Mandell; Richard G Wunderink; Antonio Anzueto; John G Bartlett; G Douglas Campbell; Nathan C Dean; Scott F Dowell; Thomas M File; Daniel M Musher; Michael S Niederman; Antonio Torres; Cynthia G Whitney
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Severity of illness assessment for managing community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Jordi Rello; Alejandro Rodriguez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Long-term prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Marcos I Restrepo; Paola Faverio; Antonio Anzueto
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.915

Review 6.  Defining and predicting severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.915

7.  Validation of the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007 guidelines for severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Barbara E Jones; Al R Jephson; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Risk prediction with procalcitonin and clinical rules in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  David T Huang; Lisa A Weissfeld; John A Kellum; Donald M Yealy; Lan Kong; Michael Martino; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  ICU admission and severity assessment in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  James D Chalmers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Late admission to the ICU in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is associated with higher mortality.

Authors:  Marcos I Restrepo; Eric M Mortensen; Jordi Rello; Jennifer Brody; Antonio Anzueto
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.