Literature DB >> 21056527

Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon's experience with an initial 200 cases.

Hwang Shin Park1, Tae-Joong Kim, Taejong Song, Min Kyu Kim, Yoo-Young Lee, Chel Hun Choi, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our initial two hundred single-port access (SPA) gynecologic surgeries and present the perioperative outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective single-center study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Two hundred selected patients with gynecological disease were recruited for the study from May 2008 through December 2009 at Samsung Medical Center.
RESULTS: Two hundred patients underwent SPA gynecological surgery (105 a total hysterectomy; 11 a subtotal hysterectomy; 43 an oophorectomy; 31 an ovarian cystectomy; 5 a salpingectomy; 2 a myomectomy; 3 adhesiolysis only). The median age and body mass index were 45.5 and 22.9 kg/m(2), respectively. SPA surgery was successfully completed in 187 patients, without the need for ancillary ports (93.5%). Two cases required a conventional multiport, and nine cases needed one additional port. Two patients were converted to a laparotomy. One intra- and five post-operative complications occurred. The complication rate was 3.2% (6/187). The median operative time was 120 min (54-250) for a total hysterectomy, 180 (150-345) for a subtotal hysterectomy, 60 (27-245) for an oophorectomy, 105 (50-185) for a cystectomy, and 60 (30-115) for a salpingectomy.
CONCLUSION: Single-port surgery was safe and feasible for gynecological indications. Further study of single-port surgery is required to determine whether it has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21056527     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Objective analysis of surgeons' ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Duarte; M Lucas-Hernández; A Matos-Azevedo; J A Sánchez-Margallo; I Díaz-Güemes; F M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Serosal Injury to a Distended Stomach during Open Entry for Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery.

Authors:  Pei-Chen Chen; Pei-Chen Li; Hsuan Chen; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Single-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy: a new dimension of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Mereu Liliana; Pontis Alessandro; Carri Giada; Mencaglia Luca
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2011-01

4.  Single-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: our initial experiences with 100 cases.

Authors:  Young-Sam Choi; Kwang-Sik Shin; Jin Choi; Ji-No Park; Yun-Sang Oh; Tae-Eel Rhee
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

5.  Adnexal Masses Treated Using a Combination of the SILS Port and Noncurved Straight Laparoscopic Instruments: Turkish Experience and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Polat Dursun; Tugan Tezcaner; Hulusi B Zeyneloglu; Irem Alyazıcı; Ali Haberal; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-11-11

6.  Feasibility of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision.

Authors:  Kazu Ueda; Yoko Nagayoshi; Ayako Kawabata; Takafumi Kuroda; Yasushi Iida; Motoaki Saitou; Nozomu Yanaihara; Kouhei Sugimoto; Masaru Sakamoto; Aikou Okamoto
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2016-06-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.