Literature DB >> 21054950

Promising cell-based therapy for bone regeneration using stem cells from deciduous teeth, dental pulp, and bone marrow.

Yoichi Yamada1, Kenji Ito, Sayaka Nakamura, Minoru Ueda, Tetsuro Nagasaka.   

Abstract

We attempted to regenerate bone in a significant osseous defect with various stem cells from deciduous teeth, extracted from puppies, and grafted them into a parent canine mandible as an allograft, parent dental pulp, and bone marrow by tissue engineering and regenerative medicine technology using platelet-rich plasma as an autologous scaffold and signal molecules. Initially, teeth were extracted from a child and parent hybrid canine mandible region and bone marrow (canine mesenchymal stem cells; cMSCs), and parent teeth (canine dental pulp stem cells; cDPSCs), and stem cells were extracted from deciduous teeth (puppy deciduous teeth stem cells; pDTSCs). After 4 weeks, bone defects were prepared on both sides of the mandible with a trephine bar. Graft materials were implanted into these defects: 1) control (defect only), 2) platelet-rich plasma (PRP), 3) cMSCs/PRP, 4) cDPSCs/PRP, and 5) pDTSCs/PRP to investigate the effect of stem cells. The newly formed bones were evaluated by histology and histomorphometric analysis in the defects at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. According to histological observations, the cMSCs/PRP, cDPSCs/PRP, and pDTSCs/PRP groups had well-formed mature bone and neovascularization compared with the control (defect only) and PRP groups at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, and the mineralized tissues in cMSCs/PRP, cDPSCs/PRP, and pDTSCs/PRP specimens were positive for osteocalcin at 8 weeks. Histometrically, newly formed bone areas were 19.0 ± 2.9% (control), 19.7 ± 6.0% (PRP), 52.8 ± 3.5% (cMSCs/PRP), 61.6 ± 1.3% (cDPSCs/PRP), and 54.7 ± 2.2% (pDTSCs/PRP) at 8 weeks. There were significant differences between cMSCs, cDPSCs, pDTSCs/PRP, and control and PRP groups. These results demonstrate that stem cells from deciduous teeth, dental pulp, and bone marrow with PRP have the ability to form bone, and bone formation with DTSCs might have the potential to generate a graft between a child and parent. This preclinical study could pave the way for stem cell therapy in orthopedics and oral maxillofacial reconstruction for clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21054950     DOI: 10.3727/096368910X539128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  42 in total

Review 1.  Bone regeneration by stem cell and tissue engineering in oral and maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Concise review: cell-based strategies in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Jinling Ma; Sanne K Both; Fang Yang; Fu-Zhai Cui; Juli Pan; Gert J Meijer; John A Jansen; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Effects of donor characteristics and ex vivo expansion on canine mesenchymal stem cell properties: implications for MSC-based therapies.

Authors:  Susan W Volk; Yanjian Wang; Kurt D Hankenson
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Transient receptor potential melastatin 4 channel is required for rat dental pulp stem cell proliferation and survival.

Authors:  T D Ngoc Tran; K E Stovall; T Suantawee; Y Hu; S Yao; L-J Yang; S Adisakwattana; H Cheng
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 5.  [Clinical applications of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth in stem cell therapy].

Authors:  Li Xiaoxia; Fangteng Jiaozi; Yu Shi; Zhao Yuming; Ge Lihong
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-10-01

Review 6.  Eminent Sources of Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Therapeutic Imminence.

Authors:  Dannie Macrin; Joel P Joseph; Aruthra Arumugam Pillai; Arikketh Devi
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Dental pulp stem cells in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  P Hollands; D Aboyeji; M Orcharton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 8.  Isolation of dental pulp stem cells with high osteogenic potential.

Authors:  Takazumi Yasui; Yo Mabuchi; Satoru Morikawa; Katsuhiro Onizawa; Chihiro Akazawa; Taneaki Nakagawa; Hideyuki Okano; Yumi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Inflamm Regen       Date:  2017-04-10

9.  Tissue-engineered autologous grafts for facial bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Sarindr Bhumiratana; Jonathan C Bernhard; David M Alfi; Keith Yeager; Ryan E Eton; Jonathan Bova; Forum Shah; Jeffrey M Gimble; Mandi J Lopez; Sidney B Eisig; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 10.  Tissue-engineered mandibular bone reconstruction for continuity defects: a systematic approach to the literature.

Authors:  Nattharee Chanchareonsook; Rüdiger Junker; Leenaporn Jongpaiboonkit; John A Jansen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.