BACKGROUND: Despite significant surgical advances over the last decades, segmental mandibular bone repair remains a challenge. In light of this, tissue engineering might offer a next step in the evolution of mandibular reconstruction. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present report was to (1) systematically review preclinical in vivo as well as clinical literature regarding bone tissue engineering for mandibular continuity defects, and (2) to analyze their effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search in the databases of the National Library of Medicine and ISI Web of Knowledge was carried out. Only publications in English were considered, and the search was broadened to animals and humans. Furthermore, the reference lists of related review articles and publications selected for inclusion in this review were systematically screened. Results of histology data and amount of bone bridging were chosen as primary outcome variables. However, for human reports, clinical radiographic evidence was accepted for defined primary outcome variable. The biomechanical properties, scaffold degradation, and clinical wound healing were selected as co-outcome variables. RESULTS: The electronic search in the databases of the National Library of Medicine and ISI Web of Knowledge resulted in the identification of 6727 and 5017 titles, respectively. Thereafter, title assessment and hand search resulted in 128 abstracts, 101 full-text articles, and 29 scientific papers reporting on animal experiments as well as 11 papers presenting human data on the subject of tissue-engineered reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects that could be included in the present review. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that (1) published preclinical in vivo as well as clinical data are limited, and (2) tissue-engineered approaches demonstrate some clinical potential as an alternative to autogenous bone grafting.
BACKGROUND: Despite significant surgical advances over the last decades, segmental mandibular bone repair remains a challenge. In light of this, tissue engineering might offer a next step in the evolution of mandibular reconstruction. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present report was to (1) systematically review preclinical in vivo as well as clinical literature regarding bone tissue engineering for mandibular continuity defects, and (2) to analyze their effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search in the databases of the National Library of Medicine and ISI Web of Knowledge was carried out. Only publications in English were considered, and the search was broadened to animals and humans. Furthermore, the reference lists of related review articles and publications selected for inclusion in this review were systematically screened. Results of histology data and amount of bone bridging were chosen as primary outcome variables. However, for human reports, clinical radiographic evidence was accepted for defined primary outcome variable. The biomechanical properties, scaffold degradation, and clinical wound healing were selected as co-outcome variables. RESULTS: The electronic search in the databases of the National Library of Medicine and ISI Web of Knowledge resulted in the identification of 6727 and 5017 titles, respectively. Thereafter, title assessment and hand search resulted in 128 abstracts, 101 full-text articles, and 29 scientific papers reporting on animal experiments as well as 11 papers presenting human data on the subject of tissue-engineered reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects that could be included in the present review. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that (1) published preclinical in vivo as well as clinical data are limited, and (2) tissue-engineered approaches demonstrate some clinical potential as an alternative to autogenous bone grafting.
Authors: Hongwei Cheng; Wei Jiang; Frank M Phillips; Rex C Haydon; Ying Peng; Lan Zhou; Hue H Luu; Naili An; Benjamin Breyer; Pantila Vanichakarn; Jan Paul Szatkowski; Jae Yoon Park; Tong-Chuan He Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kurt Busuttil Naudi; Ashraf Ayoub; Jeremy McMahon; Lucy Di Silvio; David Lappin; Keith D Hunter; Joseph Barbenel Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: A G Abu-Shahba; T Wilkman; R Kornilov; M Adam; K M Salla; J Lindén; A K Lappalainen; R Björkstrand; R Seppänen-Kaijansinkko; B Mannerström Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2021-09-11 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Daniel N Bracey; Thorsten M Seyler; Alexander H Jinnah; Mark O Lively; Jeffrey S Willey; Thomas L Smith; Mark E Van Dyke; Patrick W Whitlock Journal: J Funct Biomater Date: 2018-07-12