| Literature DB >> 21054833 |
Sandra Rauser1, Rupert Langer, Sebastian Tschernitz, Peter Gais, Uta Jütting, Marcus Feith, Heinz Höfler, Axel Walch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The validation of novel prognostic indicators is of greatest interest for the management of esophageal adenocarcinoma (Barrett's cancer), particularly for non-metastasized (stage I-IIA) disease. The prognostic role of tumor infiltrating T-lymphocytes (TILs) in Barrett's cancer has not been reported so far. Here we evaluated the impact of TILs on survival, recurrence, and metastasis in Barrett's cancer, particularly in stage I-IIA patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21054833 PMCID: PMC2988756 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients grouped by TIL density
| CD3+ TIL | CD8+ TIL | CD45RO+ TIL | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | low | high | low | high | low | high | |||
| 42 (42.4%) | 57 (57.6%) | 50 (46.7%) | 57 (53.3%) | 17 (15.5%) | 93 (84.5%) | ||||
| 0.453 | 1.0 | 0.607 | |||||||
| | 38 (38.4%) | 54 (54.5%) | 46 (43.0%) | 53 (49.5%) | 15 (13.6%) | 87 (79.1%) | |||
| | 4 (4.0%) | 3 (3.0%) | 4 (3.7%) | 4 (3.7%) | 2 (1.8%) | 6 (5.5%) | |||
| 0.298 | 0.688 | 0.353 | |||||||
| | 15 (15.3%) | 26 (26.5%) | 20 (18.9%) | 25 (23.6%) | 6 (5.5%) | 42 (38.5%) | |||
| | 7 (7.1%) | 12 (12.2%) | 9 (8.5%) | 12 (11.3%) | 2 (1.8%) | 18 (16.5%) | |||
| | 20 (20.4%) | 18 (18.4%) | 21 (19.8%) | 19 (17.9%) | 9 (8.3%) | 32 (29.4%) | |||
| 0.025 | 0.440 | 0.065 | |||||||
| | 17 (17.3%) | 35 (35.7%) | 26 (24.5%) | 31 (29.2%) | 6 (5.5%) | 54 (49.5%) | |||
| | 25 (25.5%) | 21 (21.4%) | 24 (22.6%) | 25 (23.6%) | 11 (10.1%) | 38 (34.9%) | |||
| 0.212 | 0.428 | 0.108 | |||||||
| | 37 (37.8%) | 53 (54.1%) | 45 (42.5%) | 52 (49.1%) | 14 (12.8%) | 87 (79.8%) | |||
| | 5 (5.1%) | 3 (3.1%) | 5 (4.7%) | 4 (3.8%) | 3 (2.8%) | 5 (4.6%) | |||
| 0.070 | 0.276 | 0.125 | |||||||
| | 33 (34.4%) | 51 (53.1%) | 41 (39.4%) | 51 (49.0%) | 13 (12.1%) | 81 (75.7%) | |||
| | 8 (8.3%) | 4 (4.2%) | 7 (6.7%) | 5 (4.8%) | 4 (3.7%) | 9 (8.4%) | |||
| 0.273 | 0.696 | 0.091 | |||||||
| | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 2 (1.9%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (4.6%) | |||
| | 17 (17.5%) | 27 (27.8%) | 20 (19.0%) | 26 (24.8%) | 4 (3.7%) | 42 (38.9%) | |||
| | 25 (25.8%) | 26 (26.8%) | 27 (25.7%) | 29 (27.6%) | 13 (12.0%) | 44 (40.7%) | |||
| 0.086 | 0.776 | 0.156 | |||||||
| | 11 (11.2%) | 24 (24.5%) | 16 (15.1%) | 23 (21.7%) | 4 (3.7%) | 38 (34.9%) | |||
| | 11 (11.2%) | 19 (19.4%) | 16 (15.1%) | 17 (16.0%) | 4 (3.7%) | 28 (25.7%) | |||
| | 15 (15.3%) | 10 (10.2%) | 14 (13.2%) | 12 (11.3%) | 6 (5.5%) | 21 (19.3%) | |||
| | 5 (5.1%) | 3 (3.1%) | 4 (3.8%) | 4 (3.8%) | 3 (2.8%) | 5 (4.6%) | |||
| 0.005 | 0.209 | 0.018 | |||||||
| | 13 (13.3%) | 33 (33.7%) | 21 (19.8%) | 30 (28.3%) | 4 (3.7%) | 50 (45.9%) | |||
| | 29 (29.6%) | 23 (23.5%) | 28 (26.4%) | 27 (25.5%) | 13 (11.9%) | 42 (38.5%) | |||
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier plots of disease-free (. In each cohort high and low TIL densities were plotted according to the corresponding cut-off values. Blue lines indicate patients with tumors containing high TIL densities, red lines indicate patients whose tumors had low densities of TILs. P values are calculated by log-rank tests. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for patients with high CD3+ levels was 49.2% compared to 23.6% for patients with low levels of CD3+ TILs (overall survival (OS): 54.7% versus 29.7%). Patients with high densities of CD45RO+ TILs had a 5-year DFS rate of 45.7% in contrast to 14.9% for patients with low densities of CD45RO+ (OS: 47.9% versus 24.4%).
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier plots of disease-free (. Survival differences were found when high and low densities of CD3+, CD8+, and CD45RO+ were combined. In each cohort high and low TIL densities were plotted according to the corresponding cut-off values. Blue lines indicate patients with tumors containing high CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ densities, red lines indicate patients whose tumors had low densities of CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ TILs. P values are calculated by log-rank tests. The 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients with high levels of CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ TILs was 42.9% compared to 10.0% for patients with low levels of CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ TILs (overall survival: 51.3% versus 11.7%).
Multivariate analyses
| 4.7 | 1.6-13.5 | n. s. | ||||
| 4.7 | 2.5-9.0 | 4.6 | 2.4-8.8 | |||
| 3.1 | 1.3-7.3 | 2.8 | 1.1-6.6 | |||
| 2.0 | 1.0-4.0 | 1.1 | 1.0-1.2 | |||
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; n.s., not significant; RR, relative risk
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier plots of disease-free (. (A and C) Survival rates in patients without regional lymph node metastases. (B and D) Survival rates in patients with presence of regional lymph node metastasis. In each cohort high and low TIL densities were plotted according to the corresponding cut-off values. Blue lines indicate patients with tumors containing high CD45RO+ levels, red lines indicate patients whose tumors had low densities of CD45RO+. P values are calculated by log-rank tests. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in the group of the patients without lymph node metastases was 69.4% for high CD45RO+ levels compared to 16.7% for patients with low levels of CD45RO+ levels (overall survival (OS): 69.9% versus 41.7%). In the group of the patients with lymph node metastases the 5-year DFS rate was 13.1% for patients with high densities of CD45RO+ in contrast to a rate of 15.6% for patients low densities of CD45RO+ (OS: 18.1% versus 15.3%).