Literature DB >> 21051796

Course of major depressive disorder and labor market outcome disruption.

Zhehui Luo1, Alexander J Cowell, Yuta J Musuda, Scott P Novak, Eric O Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been found to be negatively associated with labor market outcomes. However, MDD has many different courses that are chronic or persistent, relapsing and remitting, or limited to a single lifetime episode. Such heterogeneity has been ignored in most past analyses. AIMS OF THE STUDY: We examine the impact of heterogeneity in course of MDD on labor market outcomes.
METHODS: Wave I (2001-2002) respondents of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions - a nationally representative panel survey - were interviewed on average 3 years later (2004-2005). We categorized changes in MDD before and after wave I and before wave II into six courses: incident, recent remission, persistent remission, relapse, persistent depression, and no history of MDD. Odds ratios (ORs) and marginal effects of MDD transitions in multivariable multinomial regressions of labor market outcomes (being out of the labor force, being unemployed, working part-time, and working full-time -- the reference outcome) are reported.
RESULTS: Men and women who exhibited persistent remission (2 to 3 years) were equally likely to be in the labor force, employed, and working full-time, compared to those with no history of MDD (reference group). For men, recently remitted MDD (less than 1 year), compared to the reference group, increased the likelihood of being unemployed (3.2% higher probability of being unemployed conditional on being in the labor force; OR = 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13--3.44) and working part-time (5.8% higher probability of working part-time conditional on being employed; OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.10-2.80). For women, no statistically significant effect for recent remission was found. The negative effects of incident onset, relapse, and persistence of MDD were found on some labor market outcomes for men and, to a lesser extent, for women. DISCUSSION: Clinical treatment for depression should be coordinated and/or integrated with work-related interventions that help individuals who are recovering from depression to maintain their jobs. Such coordination will add to the value of clinical treatment for depression. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: The impact of MDD on labor market outcomes varies by course of illness. Past studies may have underestimated lost earnings due to mental illness because they did not distinguish between recent and persistent remission and thus did not account for lost earnings due to recent remission. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Further research is needed to understand why there are differential impacts for men and women and to make causal inferences on the relationships between MDD and labor market outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051796      PMCID: PMC3292040     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ        ISSN: 1099-176X


  32 in total

1.  The economic burden of depression in the United States: how did it change between 1990 and 2000?

Authors:  Paul E Greenberg; Ronald C Kessler; Howard G Birnbaum; Stephanie A Leong; Sarah W Lowe; Patricia A Berglund; Patricia K Corey-Lisle
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  The economic burden of affective disorders.

Authors:  D P Rice; L S Miller
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1995-04

3.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Economic costs of anxiety disorders.

Authors:  R L DuPont; D P Rice; L S Miller; S S Shiraki; C R Rowland; H J Harwood
Journal:  Anxiety       Date:  1996

5.  Changes in the prevalence of major depression and comorbid substance use disorders in the United States between 1991-1992 and 2001-2002.

Authors:  Wilson M Compton; Kevin P Conway; Frederick S Stinson; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Estimating the prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adults from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Survey.

Authors:  K H Bourdon; D S Rae; B Z Locke; W E Narrow; D A Regier
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Labor Supply of Poor Residents in Metropolitan Miami, Florida: The Role of Depression and the Co-Morbid Effects of Substance Use.

Authors:  Pierre K. Alexandre; Michael T. French
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2001-12-01

8.  Individual and societal effects of mental disorders on earnings in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Steven Heeringa; Matthew D Lakoma; Maria Petukhova; Agnes E Rupp; Michael Schoenbaum; Philip S Wang; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample.

Authors:  Bridget F Grant; Deborah A Dawson; Frederick S Stinson; Patricia S Chou; Ward Kay; Roger Pickering
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-07-20       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Depression and unemployment: panel findings from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study.

Authors:  D Dooley; R Catalano; G Wilson
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1994-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  Physical attractiveness and the accumulation of social and human capital in adolescence and young adulthood: assets and distractions.

Authors:  Rachel A Gordon; Robert Crosnoe; Xue Wang
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2013-12

2.  The Intersecting Consequences of Race-Gender Health Disparities on Workforce Engagement for Older Workers: An Examination of Physical and Mental Health.

Authors:  Kendra Jason; Christy L Erving
Journal:  Soc Curr       Date:  2021-12-05

3.  Economic analysis of an internet-based depression prevention intervention.

Authors:  Alexander Ruby; Monika Marko-Holguin; Joshua Fogel; Benjamin W Van Voorhees
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2013-09

4.  Early Improvement in Work Productivity Predicts Future Clinical Course in Depressed Outpatients: Findings From the CO-MED Trial.

Authors:  Manish K Jha; Abu Minhajuddin; Tracy L Greer; Thomas Carmody; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 5.  The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) Waves 1 and 2: review and summary of findings.

Authors:  Deborah S Hasin; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Socioeconomic and substance use changes in emerging adults and their relationship with mood disorders in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Clarisse de Azambuja Farias; Taiane de Azevedo Cardoso; Marielle Moro da Silva; Francesca D'Angelo; Thaise Campos Mondin; Luciano Dias de Mattos Souza; Ricardo Azevedo da Silva; Flavio Kapczinski; Karen Jansen; Pedro V S Magalhães
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.