Polymer-siRNA complexes (siRNA polyplexes) are being actively developed to improve the therapeutic application of siRNA. A major limitation for many siRNA polyplexes, however, is insufficient mRNA suppression. Given that modifying the sense strand of siRNA with 3' cholesterol (chol-siRNA) increases the activity of free nuclease-resistant siRNA in vitro and in vivo, we hypothesized that complexation of chol-siRNA can increase mRNA suppression by siRNA polyplexes. In this study, the characteristics and siRNA activity of self assembled polyplexes formed with chol-siRNA or unmodified siRNA were compared using three types of conventional, positively charged polymers: (i) biodegradable, cross-linked nanogels (BDNG) (ii) graft copolymers (PEI-PEG), and (iii) linear block copolymers (PLL10-PEG, and PLL50-PEG). Chol-siRNA did not alter complex formation or the resistance of polyplexes to siRNA displacement by heparin but increased nuclease protection by BDNG, PLL10-PEG, and PLL50-PEG polyplexes over polyplexes with unmodified siRNA. Chol-CYPB siRNA increased suppression of native CYPB mRNA in mammary microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) by BDNG polyplexes (35%) and PLL10-PEG polyplexes (69%) over comparable CYPB siRNA polyplexes but had no effect on PEI-PEG or PLL50-PEG polyplexes. Overall, these results indicate that complexation of chol-siRNA increases nuclease protection and mRNA suppression by select siRNA polyplexes. These results also suggest that polycationic block length is an important factor in increasing mRNA suppression by PLL-PEG chol-siRNA polyplexes in mammary MVEC.
n class="Chemical">Polymer-siRn class="Chemical">NA complexes (siRNA polyplexes) are being actively developed to improve the therapeutic application of siRNA. A major limitation for many siRNA polyplexes, however, is insufficient mRNA suppression. Given that modifying the sense strand of siRNA with 3' cholesterol (chol-siRNA) increases the activity of free nuclease-resistant siRNA in vitro and in vivo, we hypothesized that complexation of chol-siRNA can increase mRNA suppression by siRNA polyplexes. In this study, the characteristics and siRNA activity of self assembled polyplexes formed with chol-siRNA or unmodified siRNA were compared using three types of conventional, positively charged polymers: (i) biodegradable, cross-linked nanogels (BDNG) (ii) graft copolymers (PEI-PEG), and (iii) linear block copolymers (PLL10-PEG, and PLL50-PEG). Chol-siRNA did not alter complex formation or the resistance of polyplexes to siRNA displacement by heparin but increased nuclease protection by BDNG, PLL10-PEG, and PLL50-PEG polyplexes over polyplexes with unmodified siRNA. Chol-CYPB siRNA increased suppression of native CYPB mRNA in mammary microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) by BDNG polyplexes (35%) and PLL10-PEG polyplexes (69%) over comparable CYPB siRNA polyplexes but had no effect on PEI-PEG or PLL50-PEG polyplexes. Overall, these results indicate that complexation of chol-siRNA increases nuclease protection and mRNA suppression by select siRNA polyplexes. These results also suggest that polycationic block length is an important factor in increasing mRNA suppression by PLL-PEGchol-siRNA polyplexes in mammary MVEC.
Authors: Dirk Grimm; Konrad L Streetz; Catherine L Jopling; Theresa A Storm; Kusum Pandey; Corrine R Davis; Patricia Marion; Felix Salazar; Mark A Kay Journal: Nature Date: 2006-05-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: P S Jat; M D Noble; P Ataliotis; Y Tanaka; N Yannoutsos; L Larsen; D Kioussis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1991-06-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jürgen Soutschek; Akin Akinc; Birgit Bramlage; Klaus Charisse; Rainer Constien; Mary Donoghue; Sayda Elbashir; Anke Geick; Philipp Hadwiger; Jens Harborth; Matthias John; Venkitasamy Kesavan; Gary Lavine; Rajendra K Pandey; Timothy Racie; Kallanthottathil G Rajeev; Ingo Röhl; Ivanka Toudjarska; Gang Wang; Silvio Wuschko; David Bumcrot; Victor Koteliansky; Stefan Limmer; Muthiah Manoharan; Hans-Peter Vornlocher Journal: Nature Date: 2004-11-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Martin Bertschinger; Gaurav Backliwal; Arnaud Schertenleib; Martin Jordan; David L Hacker; Florian M Wurm Journal: J Control Release Date: 2006-09-22 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: O Boussif; F Lezoualc'h; M A Zanta; M D Mergny; D Scherman; B Demeneix; J P Behr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-08-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Samantha M Sarett; Thomas A Werfel; Linus Lee; Meredith A Jackson; Kameron V Kilchrist; Dana Brantley-Sieders; Craig L Duvall Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Samantha M Sarett; Thomas A Werfel; Irene Chandra; Meredith A Jackson; Taylor E Kavanaugh; Madison E Hattaway; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Meredith A Jackson; Sean K Bedingfield; Fang Yu; Mitchell E Stokan; Rachel E Miles; Elizabeth J Curvino; Ella N Hoogenboezem; Rachel H Bonami; Shrusti S Patel; Peggy L Kendall; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Vishakha V Ambardekar; Rajesh R Wakaskar; Bhawna Sharma; Joy Bowman; Willy Vayaboury; Rakesh K Singh; Joseph A Vetro Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Vishakha V Ambardekar; Rajesh R Wakaskar; Zhen Ye; Stephen M Curran; Timothy R McGuire; Don W Coulter; Rakesh K Singh; Joseph A Vetro Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.875