Literature DB >> 21047295

Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom.

Clare S Howard1, Kevin J Munro, Christopher J Plack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to measure listening effort at typical classroom signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
DESIGN: Listening effort was measured using a dual task paradigm. Participants repeated monosyllabic words presented in a background of children's chatter (primary task) at SNRs that are considered typical of the school classroom environment (quiet, +4, 0, -4 dB) while simultaneously rehearsing sets of five digits for recall (secondary task). High listening effort requires greater cognitive resources and is associated with reduced performance on the secondary task. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty one normal-hearing children (9-12 years).
RESULTS: Performance was generally maintained on the listening task when multitasking; however, performance decreased on the secondary recall task, especially at the more negative SNRs.
CONCLUSIONS: This demonstrates that considerable listening effort is required when listening at SNRs that are typical of the school classroom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047295     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.520036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  20 in total

1.  How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening.

Authors:  Melanie Ferguson; Helen Henshaw
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

2.  Speech-Processing Fatigue in Children: Auditory Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  Alexandra P Key; Samantha J Gustafson; Lindsey Rentmeester; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Fred H Bess
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effects of Noise on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Dawna Lewis; Kendra Schmid; Samantha O'Leary; Jody Spalding; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Robin High
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Child-Adult Differences in Using Dual-Task Paradigms to Measure Listening Effort.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Lauren M Charles; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  Auditory training can improve working memory, attention, and communication in adverse conditions for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Melanie A Ferguson; Helen Henshaw
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-28

6.  Effects of pedagogical ideology on the perceived loudness and noise levels in preschools.

Authors:  Valdis Jonsdottir; Leena M Rantala; Gudmundur Kr Oskarsson; Eeva Sala
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Only Behavioral But Not Self-Report Measures of Speech Perception Correlate with Cognitive Abilities.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-23

8.  Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Afiqah Yusuf; Daryl E Wilson; Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Working memory training for adult hearing aid users: study protocol for a double-blind randomized active controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Effects of ambient noise on detectability and localization of avian songs and tones by observers in grasslands.

Authors:  Nicola Koper; Lionel Leston; Tyne M Baker; Claire Curry; Patricia Rosa
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.