Literature DB >> 21046301

Past, present, and future regulatory aspects of ventricular assist devices.

Sonna M Patel-Raman1, Eric A Chen.   

Abstract

The development of ventricular assist devices (VADs) for the treatment of heart failure has been ongoing since the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) initiated the artificial heart program in 1964. The primary goal was to develop VADs and total artificial hearts for both temporary (short-term) and long-term use. Due to a small target population and the inability to blind patients and clinicians, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized the challenges of conducting trials with these invasive devices. In an effort to address those challenges, FDA has accepted a variety of clinical trial designs to collect the data required to evaluate safety and effectiveness data in different patient groups. This article will provide a detailed discussion of the past, present, and future FDA regulatory considerations for VADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21046301     DOI: 10.1007/s12265-010-9225-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  7 in total

1.  Results with the Novacor assist system and evaluation of long-term assistance.

Authors:  I Di Bella; F Pagani; C Banfi; E Ardemagni; A Capo; C Klersy; M Viganò
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  D J Farrar; J D Hill; D G Pennington; L R McBride; W L Holman; R L Kormos; D Esmore; L A Gray; P E Seifert; G P Schoettle; C H Moore; P J Hendry; J N Bhayana
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation.

Authors:  O H Frazier; E A Rose; M C Oz; W Dembitsky; P McCarthy; B Radovancevic; V L Poirier; K A Dasse
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Device and patient management in a bridge-to-transplant setting.

Authors:  A El-Banayosy; R Körfer; L Arusoglu; L Kizner; M Morshuis; H Milting; G Tenderich; O Fey; K Minami
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Morbidity and outcome after mechanical ventricular support using Thoratec, Novacor, and HeartMate for bridging to heart transplantation.

Authors:  K Minami; A El-Banayosy; A Sezai; L Arusoglu; P Sarnowsky; O Fey; R Koerfer
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  Novacor left ventricular assist system versus Heartmate vented electric left ventricular assist system as a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in bridging patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  A El-Banayosy; L Arusoglu; L Kizner; G Tenderich; K Minami; K Inoue; R Körfer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.