Literature DB >> 10886058

Morbidity and outcome after mechanical ventricular support using Thoratec, Novacor, and HeartMate for bridging to heart transplantation.

K Minami1, A El-Banayosy, A Sezai, L Arusoglu, P Sarnowsky, O Fey, R Koerfer.   

Abstract

Between September 1989 and June 1999, 228 patients were supported with a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation. In this study, the results of implantation were evaluated in patients supported with one type of device, including 85 supported with a Thoratec, 61 with a Novacor, and 37 with a HeartMate. The mean support time was 49, 148, and 124 days, respectively. Successful transplantation and weaning rates were 64. 7% with Thoratec, 59.0% with Novacor, and 62.0% with HeartMate. Cerebral embolism and drive-line and pocket infection were major causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality. We recommended that a Thoratec system be employed as a bridge to heart transplantation for patients with biventricular heart failure, and that a Novacor or HeartMate system be implanted in patients requiring a long-term circulatory support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10886058     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06621.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD) in Japan: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Setsuo Takatani; Hikaru Matsuda; Akihisa Hanatani; Chisato Nojiri; Kenji Yamazaki; Tadashi Motomura; Katsuhiro Ohuchi; Tohru Sakamoto; Takashi Yamane
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Past, present, and future regulatory aspects of ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sonna M Patel-Raman; Eric A Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Deborah J Kozik; Mark D Plunkett
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  New Treatment for Percutaneous Sites in Patients with a Ventricular Assist Device: Nihon University Crystal Violet Method.

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Tetsuya Niino; Shunji Osaka; Hiroko Yaoita; Munehito Arimoto; Hiroaki Hata; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.520

5.  Nontransplant surgical alternatives for heart failure.

Authors:  Edwin C McGee; Kathleen L Grady; Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  [Infection control measures and surveillance of patients with ventricular assist devices].

Authors:  F Mattner; I F Chaberny; L Mattner; P Gastmeier; R Tessmann; M Strüber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Prospective, multicenter study of ventricular assist device infections.

Authors:  Rachel J Gordon; Alan D Weinberg; Francis D Pagani; Mark S Slaughter; Pat S Pappas; Yoshifumi Naka; Daniel J Goldstein; Walter P Dembitsky; Julie C Giacalone; Jennifer Ferrante; Deborah D Ascheim; Alan J Moskowitz; Eric A Rose; Annetine C Gelijns; Franklin D Lowy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Miniaturization of mechanical circulatory support systems.

Authors:  Guruprasad A Giridharan; Thomas J Lee; Mickey Ising; Michael A Sobieski; Steven C Koenig; Laman A Gray; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 9.  Cardiac rehabilitation and artificial heart devices.

Authors:  Atsuko Ueno; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Mechanical circulatory support for fulminant myocarditis.

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Mitsumasa Hata; Tetsuya Niino; Masataka Yoda; Tadateru Takayama; Satoshi Saito; Mamoru Ayusawa; Kazutomo Minami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.