Literature DB >> 21044671

Effects of electrical stimulation on the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response in guinea pigs with a high-frequency hearing loss.

H Christiaan Stronks1, Huib Versnel, Vera F Prijs, Wilko Grolman, Sjaak F L Klis.   

Abstract

Criteria for cochlear implantation keep expanding and people with substantial residual low-frequency hearing are considered candidates for implantation nowadays. Therefore, electro-acoustical stimulation in the same ear (EAS) is receiving increasing interest. We have investigated the effects of intracochlear electrical stimulation on acoustically evoked auditory-nerve activity, using a forward masking paradigm. The stimulation electrode was placed in the basal turn of the cochlea. Compound action potential (CAP) recordings were performed in guinea pigs with severe high-frequency hearing loss and in normal-hearing control animals. In normal-hearing animals, electrical stimulation generally suppressed CAPs, especially at high acoustic frequencies (8 and 16 kHz) and low sound levels. At low frequencies (0.5 and 1 kHz), suppression was observed only at high sound levels. In animals with a high-frequency hearing loss, suppression of CAPs at low frequencies was substantially less compared to control animals, even at high current levels and temporal overlap of acoustic and electric stimuli. Hence, effects of electrical stimulation substantially differed between normal-hearing animals and animals with a high-frequency hearing loss. These findings stress the need for a proper animal model when investigating EAS. We conclude that in case of high-frequency loss, the basal part of the cochlea can be stimulated electrically with little effect on responses to low-frequency acoustic stimuli.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044671     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

1.  Detection of intracochlear damage with cochlear implantation in a gerbil model of hearing loss.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Oliver Franz Adunka; Christine E Demason; Faisal I Ahmad; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  S Irving; A K Wise; R E Millard; R K Shepherd; J B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Forward Electric Stimulation-Induced Interference in Intracochlear Electrocochleography of Acoustic Stimulation in the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Shiyao Min; Tianhao Lu; Min Chen; Jiabao Mao; Xuerui Hu; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 4.  Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.

Authors:  S Irving; L Gillespie; R Richardson; D Rowe; J B Fallon; A K Wise
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.

Authors:  Marina Imsiecke; Benjamin Krüger; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.