Literature DB >> 21043364

Effect of embryo transfer number on singleton and twin implantation pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology.

Barbara Luke1, Morton B Brown, Judy E Stern, David A Grainger, Nancy Klein, Marcelle Cedars.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of embryo transfer number on singleton and twin pregnancy outcomes with one and two fetal heartbeats on early ultrasound, respectively. STUDY
DESIGN: The study included 23,645 singleton and 14,083 twin live births from the SART-CORS Online database of assisted reproductive technology cycles for 2004-2006. The data were limited to fresh embryo transfers among women who had additional embryos cryopreserved during the same cycle, resulting either in one fetal heartbeat on early ultrasound and a singleton live birth, or two fetal heartbeats and a twin live birth. Data were categorized by number of embryos transferred; the reference group was one for singletons and two for twins. The primary outcome measure was moderate growth restriction (birthweight for gestation z-score < -1), adjusted for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Risk for moderate growth restriction among singletons was increased by 15%, 23%, and 37%, respectively, with 2, 3, and > or = 4 embryos transferred, and among twins, by 50% and 105%, respectively, with 3 and > or = 4 embryos transferred.
CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate a significant residual adverse effect on intrauterine growth from transfer of multiple embryos. Whether this effect is due to compromised embryo quality, degenerating implantation sites, or other etiology is unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21043364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  11 in total

1.  Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; G Owen Schaefer; Kelton Tremellen; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2015-04

2.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Birth Outcomes by Infertility Treatment: Analyses of the Population-Based Cohort: Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Marlene Anderka; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Mark D Hornstein; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART).

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Daksha Gopal; Rebecca F Liberman; Marlene Anderka; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research?

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral; Eugene R Declercq
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Risks of nonchromosomal birth defects, small-for-gestational age birthweight, and prematurity with in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception versus at birth.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Nina E Forestieri; Marilyn L Browne; Sarah C Fisher; Mahsa M Yazdy; Mary K Ethen; Mark A Canfield; Hazel B Nichols; Sergio Oehninger; Kevin J Doody; Alastair G Sutcliffe; Carrie Williams; Michael L Eisenberg; Valerie L Baker; Caitlin R Sacha; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Standardized Infertility Treatments not only Ensure Maternal-Fetal Health but also Provide Higher Success Rates.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.