Literature DB >> 21043284

Miscanthus and switchgrass production in central Illinois: impacts on hydrology and inorganic nitrogen leaching.

Gregory F McIsaac1, Mark B David, Corey A Mitchell.   

Abstract

Biomass crops are being promoted as environmentally favorable alternatives to fossil fuels or ethanol production from maize (Zea mays L.), particularly across the Corn Belt of the United States. However, there are few if any empirical studies on inorganic N leaching losses from perennial grasses that are harvested on an annual basis, nor has there been empirical evaluation of the hydrologic consequences of perennial cropping systems. Here we report on the results of 4 yr of field measurements of soil moisture and inorganic N leaching from a conventional maize-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] system and two unfertilized perennial grasses harvested in winter for biomass: Miscanthus x giganteus and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum cv. Cave-in-Rock). All crops were grown on fertile Mollisols in east-central Illinois. Inorganic N leaching was measured with ion exchange resin lysimeters placed 50 cm below the soil surface. Maize--soybean nitrate leaching averaged 40.4 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1), whereas switchgrass and Miscanthus had values of 1.4 and 3.0 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1), respectively. Soil moisture monitoring (to a depth of 90 cm) indicated that both perennial grasses dried the soil out earlier in the growing season compared with maize-soybean. Later in the growing season, soil moisture under switchgrass tended to be greater than maize-soybean or Miscanthus, whereas the soil under Miscanthus was consistently drier than under maize--soybean. Water budget calculations indicated that evapotranspiration from Miscanthus was about 104 mm yr(-1) greater than under maize-soybean, which could reduce annual drainage water flows by 32% in central Illinois. Drainage water is a primary source of surface water flows in the region, and the impact ofextensive Miscanthus production on surface water supplies and aquatic ecosystems deserves further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21043284     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  9 in total

1.  Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States.

Authors:  Phong V V Le; Praveen Kumar; Darren T Drewry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bioenergy Development Policy and Practice Must Recognize Potential Hydrologic Impacts: Lessons from the Americas.

Authors:  David W Watkins; Márcia M G Alcoforado de Moraes; Heidi Asbjornsen; Alex S Mayer; Julian Licata; Jose Gutierrez Lopez; Thomas G Pypker; Vivianna Gamez Molina; Guilherme Fernandes Marques; Ana Cristina Guimaraes Carneiro; Hector M Nuñez; Hayri Önal; Bruna da Nobrega Germano
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK.

Authors:  Jon P McCalmont; Astley Hastings; Niall P McNamara; Goetz M Richter; Paul Robson; Iain S Donnison; John Clifton-Brown
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.745

Review 4.  Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use.

Authors:  Jeanette Whitaker; John L Field; Carl J Bernacchi; Carlos E P Cerri; Reinhart Ceulemans; Christian A Davies; Evan H DeLucia; Iain S Donnison; Jon P McCalmont; Keith Paustian; Rebecca L Rowe; Pete Smith; Patricia Thornley; Niall P McNamara
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.745

5.  Water impacts of U.S. biofuels: Insights from an assessment combining economic and biophysical models.

Authors:  Jacob Teter; Sonia Yeh; Madhu Khanna; Göran Berndes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phosphorus availability and leaching losses in annual and perennial cropping systems in an upper US Midwest landscape.

Authors:  Mir Zaman Hussain; Stephen K Hamilton; G Philip Robertson; Bruno Basso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Response of Total (DNA) and Metabolically Active (RNA) Microbial Communities in Miscanthus × Giganteus Cultivated Soil to Different Nitrogen Fertilization Rates.

Authors:  Jihoon Yang; Jaejin Lee; Jinlyung Choi; Lanying Ma; Emily A Heaton; Adina Howe
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 8.  Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Hely Häggman; Alan Raybould; Aluizio Borem; Thomas Fox; Levis Handley; Magnus Hertzberg; Meng-Zu Lu; Philip Macdonald; Taichi Oguchi; Giancarlo Pasquali; Les Pearson; Gary Peter; Hector Quemada; Armand Séguin; Kylie Tattersall; Eugênio Ulian; Christian Walter; Morven McLean
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Marginal Lands to Grow Novel Bio-Based Crops: A Plant Breeding Perspective.

Authors:  Francesco Pancaldi; Luisa M Trindade
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.753

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.