Literature DB >> 21876137

Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States.

Phong V V Le1, Praveen Kumar, Darren T Drewry.   

Abstract

To meet emerging bioenergy demands, significant areas of the large-scale agricultural landscape of the Midwestern United States could be converted to second generation bioenergy crops such as miscanthus and switchgrass. The high biomass productivity of bioenergy crops in a longer growing season linked tightly to water use highlight the potential for significant impact on the hydrologic cycle in the region. This issue is further exacerbated by the uncertainty in the response of the vegetation under elevated CO(2) and temperature. We use a mechanistic multilayer canopy-root-soil model to (i) capture the eco-physiological acclimations of bioenergy crops under climate change, and (ii) predict how hydrologic fluxes are likely to be altered from their current magnitudes. Observed data and Monte Carlo simulations of weather for recent past and future scenarios are used to characterize the variability range of the predictions. Under present weather conditions, miscanthus and switchgrass utilized more water than maize for total seasonal evapotranspiration by approximately 58% and 36%, respectively. Projected higher concentrations of atmospheric CO(2) (550 ppm) is likely to decrease water used for evapotranspiration of miscanthus, switchgrass, and maize by 12%, 10%, and 11%, respectively. However, when climate change with projected increases in air temperature and reduced summer rainfall are also considered, there is a net increase in evapotranspiration for all crops, leading to significant reduction in soil-moisture storage and specific surface runoff. These results highlight the critical role of the warming climate in potentially altering the water cycle in the region under extensive conversion of existing maize cropping to support bioenergy demand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21876137      PMCID: PMC3174653          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107177108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  Control of transpiration by radiation.

Authors:  Roland Pieruschka; Gregor Huber; Joseph A Berry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials.

Authors:  Arthur J Ragauskas; Charlotte K Williams; Brian H Davison; George Britovsek; John Cairney; Charles A Eckert; William J Frederick; Jason P Hallett; David J Leak; Charles L Liotta; Jonathan R Mielenz; Richard Murphy; Richard Templer; Timothy Tschaplinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Impact of biofuel crop production on the formation of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Christine Costello; W Michael Griffin; Amy E Landis; H Scott Matthews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO2 concentration in the absence of drought.

Authors:  Andrew D B Leakey; Martin Uribelarrea; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Shawna L Naidu; Alistair Rogers; Donald R Ort; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass.

Authors:  David Tilman; Jason Hill; Clarence Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Impairment of C(4) photosynthesis by drought is exacerbated by limiting nitrogen and ameliorated by elevated [CO(2)] in maize.

Authors:  R J Cody Markelz; Reid S Strellner; Andrew D B Leakey
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 7.  Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future.

Authors:  Stephen P Long; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Alistair Rogers; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

8.  Bundle sheath leakiness and light limitation during C4 leaf and canopy CO2 uptake.

Authors:  Johannes Kromdijk; Hans E Schepers; Fabrizio Albanito; Nuala Fitton; Faye Carroll; Michael B Jones; John Finnan; Gary J Lanigan; Howard Griffiths
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass.

Authors:  M R Schmer; K P Vogel; R B Mitchell; R K Perrin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Does greater leaf-level photosynthesis explain the larger solar energy conversion efficiency of Miscanthus relative to switchgrass?

Authors:  F G Dohleman; E A Heaton; A D B Leakey; S P Long
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 7.228

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bioenergy Development Policy and Practice Must Recognize Potential Hydrologic Impacts: Lessons from the Americas.

Authors:  David W Watkins; Márcia M G Alcoforado de Moraes; Heidi Asbjornsen; Alex S Mayer; Julian Licata; Jose Gutierrez Lopez; Thomas G Pypker; Vivianna Gamez Molina; Guilherme Fernandes Marques; Ana Cristina Guimaraes Carneiro; Hector M Nuñez; Hayri Önal; Bruna da Nobrega Germano
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Fast Growing Plantations for Wood Production - Integration of Ecological Effects and Economic Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Bredemeier; Gerald Busch; Linda Hartmann; Martin Jansen; Falk Richter; Norbert P Lamersdorf
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-09

3.  Decreasing, not increasing, leaf area will raise crop yields under global atmospheric change.

Authors:  Venkatraman Srinivasan; Praveen Kumar; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Stochastic lattice-based modelling of malaria dynamics.

Authors:  Phong V V Le; Praveen Kumar; Marilyn O Ruiz
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Water impacts of U.S. biofuels: Insights from an assessment combining economic and biophysical models.

Authors:  Jacob Teter; Sonia Yeh; Madhu Khanna; Göran Berndes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predicting the direct and indirect impacts of climate change on malaria in coastal Kenya.

Authors:  Phong V V Le; Praveen Kumar; Marilyn O Ruiz; Charles Mbogo; Ephantus J Muturi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Agave as a model CAM crop system for a warming and drying world.

Authors:  J Ryan Stewart
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Streamflow impacts of biofuel policy-driven landscape change.

Authors:  Sami Khanal; Robert P Anex; Christopher J Anderson; Daryl E Herzmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Potential impacts on ecosystem services of land use transitions to second-generation bioenergy crops in GB.

Authors:  Suzanne Milner; Robert A Holland; Andrew Lovett; Gilla Sunnenberg; Astley Hastings; Pete Smith; Shifeng Wang; Gail Taylor
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.745

10.  Inhibition of microbial biofuel production in drought-stressed switchgrass hydrolysate.

Authors:  Rebecca Garlock Ong; Alan Higbee; Scott Bottoms; Quinn Dickinson; Dan Xie; Scott A Smith; Jose Serate; Edward Pohlmann; Arthur Daniel Jones; Joshua J Coon; Trey K Sato; Gregg R Sanford; Dustin Eilert; Lawrence G Oates; Jeff S Piotrowski; Donna M Bates; David Cavalier; Yaoping Zhang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.