Literature DB >> 21041520

Older homebound women: negotiating reliance on a cane or walker.

Eileen J Porter1, Jacquelyn J Benson, Sandy Matsuda.   

Abstract

Canes and walkers are commonly characterized as assistive devices that serve the same purpose: as walking aides. These general views were reappraised and tempered in this descriptive phenomenological study with 40 older women (aged 85 to 98 years) who were unable to leave their homes without help. The purpose was to describe the phenomena of negotiating reliance on canes and walkers as walking devices and the lifeworld context underlying each phenomenon. Relative to lifeworld, there were differences between coming to terms with using a cane and coming to terms with using a walker. Data revealed similarities and distinctions between the basic intentions of relying on canes and walkers and the associated purposes served by canes and walkers. Participants did not view either device as consistently assistive. Findings evoke opportunities for dialogue among older persons, scholars, practitioners, and designers of these devices about coming to terms with such devices and relying on them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21041520      PMCID: PMC3355527          DOI: 10.1177/1049732310385822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  22 in total

1.  Older adults and assistive devices: use, multiple-device use, and need.

Authors:  R J Hartke; T R Prohaska; S E Furner
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  1998-02

2.  A phenomenological alternative to the "ADL research tradition".

Authors:  E J Porter
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  1995-02

3.  Wheelchairs, walkers, and canes: what does Medicare pay for, and who benefits?

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Emily M Agree; Judith D Kasper
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Mobility limitations in the Medicare population: prevalence and sociodemographic and clinical correlates.

Authors:  Anne Shumway-Cook; Marcia A Ciol; Kathryn M Yorkston; Jeanne M Hoffman; Leighton Chan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences.

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  On "being inspired" by Husserl's Phenomenology: reflections on Omery's exposition of phenomenology as a method of nursing research.

Authors:  E J Porter
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.824

7.  Mobility aids and the elderly client.

Authors:  K L Rush; L L Ouellet
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.254

8.  Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use.

Authors:  L N Gitlin; M R Luborsky; R L Schemm
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1998-04

9.  Receptivity to new technology among older adults.

Authors:  Z Zimmer; N L Chappell
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  "Reducing my risks": a phenomenon of older widows' lived experience.

Authors:  E J Porter
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.824

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.

Authors:  Ya-Huei Wu; Jérémy Wrobel; Mélanie Cornuet; Hélène Kerhervé; Souad Damnée; Anne-Sophie Rigaud
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  The Use of Mobility Devices and Personal Assistance: A Joint Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Hongdao Meng; Lindsay J Peterson; Lijuan Feng; Debra Dobbs; Kathryn Hyer
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-10-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.