OBJECTIVE: Implementation of evidence-based, innovative treatments is necessary to address posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related mental health problems of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF-OIF) military service personnel. The purpose of this study was to characterize mental health clinicians' perceptions of virtual reality as an assessment tool or adjunct to exposure therapy. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 18 prescribing and nonprescribing mental health clinicians within the Veterans Health Administration. Group discussion was digitally recorded, downloaded into Ethnograph software, and coded to arrive at primary, secondary, and tertiary themes. RESULTS: Most frequently mentioned barriers pertained to aspects of virtual reality, followed by veteran characteristics. Organizational barriers were more relevant when implementing virtual reality as a treatment adjunct. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study demonstrated that use of virtual reality as a therapy was feasible and acceptable to clinicians, successful implementation of the technology as an assessment and treatment tool will depend on consideration of the facilitators and barriers that were identified.
OBJECTIVE: Implementation of evidence-based, innovative treatments is necessary to address posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related mental health problems of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF-OIF) military service personnel. The purpose of this study was to characterize mental health clinicians' perceptions of virtual reality as an assessment tool or adjunct to exposure therapy. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 18 prescribing and nonprescribing mental health clinicians within the Veterans Health Administration. Group discussion was digitally recorded, downloaded into Ethnograph software, and coded to arrive at primary, secondary, and tertiary themes. RESULTS: Most frequently mentioned barriers pertained to aspects of virtual reality, followed by veteran characteristics. Organizational barriers were more relevant when implementing virtual reality as a treatment adjunct. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study demonstrated that use of virtual reality as a therapy was feasible and acceptable to clinicians, successful implementation of the technology as an assessment and treatment tool will depend on consideration of the facilitators and barriers that were identified.
Authors: Danielle Levac; Stephanie M N Glegg; Heidi Sveistrup; Heather Colquhoun; Patricia A Miller; Hillel Finestone; Vincent DePaul; Jocelyn E Harris; Diana Velikonja Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Michelle Sophie Keller; Hannah J Park; Maria Elena Cunningham; Joshua Eleazar Fouladian; Michelle Chen; Brennan Mason Ross Spiegel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Olivia S Chung; Alisha M Johnson; Nathan L Dowling; Tracy Robinson; Chee H Ng; Murat Yücel; Rebecca A Segrave Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Olivia S Chung; Tracy Robinson; Alisha M Johnson; Nathan L Dowling; Chee H Ng; Murat Yücel; Rebecca A Segrave Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 5.435