OBJECTIVES: Whole systems of complementary and alternative medicine (WSCAM) emphasize positive emergent outcomes for the patient, for example, a sense of well-being. This paper presents a questionnaire-based study in healthy young adults for the purpose of exploring individual differences that contribute to the sense of well-being and to identify characteristics of flourishing versus nonflourishing individuals in terms of nonlinear dynamical systems concepts. METHODS: Young adult college students (N = 856) completed questionnaires assessing global well-being (Arizona Integrative Outcomes Scale [AIOS]), global physical health, positive and negative mood (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule [PANAS]), resilience (Connor- Davidson Resilience Scale), and repressive defensiveness. Next, subjects were divided into flourisher/languisher groups by a previously determined ratio of positive/negative scores established by a study using complex systems methods. RESULTS: Positive-to-negative affect (P:N) ratio accounted for more variance in AIOS (R(2) = 0.19; P < .001) than did separate positive or negative PANAS scores or physical health. Flourishers (14.5% of the sample) were significantly higher than languishers in defensiveness and resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Positive-to-negative affect explains a substantial portion of the variance in well-being of healthy young adults. The low percentage of flourishers in this nonclinical sample is consistent with previous population-based studies and suggests that flourishers are a minority, even in nonclinical settings. Positive-to-negative affect may be a useful variable for subsequent prospective studies of applied WSCAM treatments and in well and clinical populations. The well-being measure used in this study is easy to complete, sensitive, and may be a useful clinical measure to track change with treatment over time.
OBJECTIVES: Whole systems of complementary and alternpan>ative medicine (WSCAM) emphasize positive emergent outcomes for the patient, for example, a sense of well-being. This paper presents a questionnaire-based study in healthy young adults for the purpose of exploring individual differences that contribute to the sense of well-being and to identify characteristics of flourishing versus nonflourishing individuals in terms of nonlinear dynamical systems concepts. METHODS: Young adult college students (N = 856) completed questionnaires assessing global well-being (Arizona Integrative Outcomes Scale [AIOS]), global physical health, positive and negative mood (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule [PANAS]), resilience (Connor- Davidson Resilience Scale), and repressive defensiveness. Next, subjects were divided into flourisher/languisher groups by a previously determined ratio of positive/negative scores established by a study using complex systems methods. RESULTS: Positive-to-negative affect (P:N) ratio accounted for more variance in AIOS (R(2) = 0.19; P < .001) than did separate positive or negative PANAS scores or physical health. Flourishers (14.5% of the sample) were significantly higher than languishers in defensiveness and resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Positive-to-negative affect explains a substantial portion of the variance in well-being of healthy young adults. The low percentage of flourishers in this nonclinical sample is consistent with previous population-based studies and suggests that flourishers are a minority, even in nonclinical settings. Positive-to-negative affect may be a useful variable for subsequent prospective studies of applied WSCAM treatments and in well and clinical populations. The well-being measure used in this study is easy to complete, sensitive, and may be a useful clinical measure to track change with treatment over time.
Authors: Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Marja Verhoef; Susan Fleishman; Heather Boon; Ann Leis Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.305
Authors: Iris R Bell; Opher Caspi; Gary E R Schwartz; Kathryn L Grant; Tracy W Gaudet; David Rychener; Victoria Maizes; Andrew Weil Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-01-28
Authors: Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Richard Hammerschlag; Samuel F Dworkin; Mikel G Aickin; Scott D Mist; Charles R Elder; Richard E Harris Journal: J Pain Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Martha Brown Menard; John Weeks; Belinda Anderson; William Meeker; Carlo Calabrese; David O'Bryon; Greg D Cramer Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Jesús Montero-Marin; Mattie Tops; Rick Manzanera; Marcelo M Piva Demarzo; Melchor Álvarez de Mon; Javier García-Campayo Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2015-12-17
Authors: Javier García-Campayo; Yolanda L Del Hoyo; Alberto Barceló-Soler; Mayte Navarro-Gil; Luis Borao; Veronica Giarin; R Raziel Tovar-Garcia; Jesus Montero-Marin Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2018-05-14
Authors: Victoria Guazzelli Williamson; Alexandra M Lee; Darci Miller; Tianyao Huo; Jon K Maner; Michelle Cardel Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 5.717