OBJECTIVES: To identify areas that classical homeopathic practitioners would want to see evaluated in a patient self-report questionnaire sensitive to change during constitutional treatment. DESIGN: Open-ended, written practitioner questionnaire, analyzed using inductive content analysis. SETTINGS/LOCATION: Two classical homeopathic meetings held in the western United States. SUBJECTS: Homeopathic practitioners attending the above professional meetings and volunteering to complete the questionnaire in response to announcements prior to sessions. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Practitioners completed a demographic questionnaire and answered an open-ended question inquiring for changes about which to ask people undergoing classical homeopathic constitutional treatment. RESULTS: The categories that the 38 homeopaths identified included changes in: (1) emotions; (2) mentation; (3) specific physical functioning; (4) general physical changes; (5) perception of self; (6) relationships; (7) spirituality; (8) lifestyle; (9) energy; (10) dream content and tone; (11) well-being; (12) perceptions by others; (13) life relationships; (14) a sense of freedom or feeling less "stuck"; (15) sleep; (16) coping; (17) ability to adapt; (18) creativity; and (19) recall of past experiences. Sixteen percent (16%) of participants added more in-depth description of the nature of changes across categories (i.e., a rhythmical process of innovation and flux). CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with the systemic orientation of classical homeopathic philosophy to evaluate and treat the patient as a whole. Taken together, the results support the need for development of new, multidimensional outcome measures for clinical research in homeopathy beyond the disease-specific and health-related quality-of-life scales available from conventional medical research.
OBJECTIVES: To identify areas that classical homeopathic practitioners would want to see evaluated in a patient self-report questionnaire sensitive to change during constitutional treatment. DESIGN: Open-ended, written practitioner questionnaire, analyzed using inductive content analysis. SETTINGS/LOCATION: Two classical homeopathic meetings held in the western United States. SUBJECTS: Homeopathic practitioners attending the above professional meetings and volunteering to complete the questionnaire in response to announcements prior to sessions. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Practitioners completed a demographic questionnaire and answered an open-ended question inquiring for changes about which to ask people undergoing classical homeopathic constitutional treatment. RESULTS: The categories that the 38 homeopaths identified included changes in: (1) emotions; (2) mentation; (3) specific physical functioning; (4) general physical changes; (5) perception of self; (6) relationships; (7) spirituality; (8) lifestyle; (9) energy; (10) dream content and tone; (11) well-being; (12) perceptions by others; (13) life relationships; (14) a sense of freedom or feeling less "stuck"; (15) sleep; (16) coping; (17) ability to adapt; (18) creativity; and (19) recall of past experiences. Sixteen percent (16%) of participants added more in-depth description of the nature of changes across categories (i.e., a rhythmical process of innovation and flux). CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with the systemic orientation of classical homeopathic philosophy to evaluate and treat the patient as a whole. Taken together, the results support the need for development of new, multidimensional outcome measures for clinical research in homeopathy beyond the disease-specific and health-related quality-of-life scales available from conventional medical research.
Authors: Caroline Eyles; Geraldine M Leydon; George T Lewith; Sarah Brien Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Elizabeth G Sutherland; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Susan J Kiley; Nancy Vuckovic; Charles Elder Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Jennifer J Thompson; Kimberly L Kelly; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Allison L Hopkins; Colette M Sims; Stephen J Coons Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mimi Nichter; Mark A Nichter; Kimberly L Kelly; Colette M Sims; Iris R Bell; Heide M Castañeda; Charles R Elder; Mary S Koithan; Elizabeth G Sutherland; Marja J Verhoef; Sarah L Warber; Stephen J Coons Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Robert T Mathie; Helmut Roniger; Michel Van Wassenhoven; Joyce Frye; Jennifer Jacobs; Menachem Oberbaum; Marie-France Bordet; Chaturbhuja Nayak; Gilles Chaufferin; John A Ives; Flávio Dantas; Peter Fisher Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 4.615