| Literature DB >> 21040561 |
Shu-Yi Yin1, Wen-Hsin Wang, Bi-Xue Wang, Kandan Aravindaram, Pei-Ing Hwang, Han-Ming Wu, Ning-Sun Yang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several Echinacea species have been used as nutraceuticals or botanical drugs for "immunostimulation", but scientific evidence supporting their therapeutic use is still controversial. In this study, a phytocompound mixture extracted from the butanol fraction (BF) of a stem and leaf (S+L) extract of E. purpurea ([BF/S+L/Ep]) containing stringently defined bioactive phytocompounds was obtained using standardized and published procedures. The transcriptomic and proteomic effects of this phytoextract on mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were analyzed using primary cultures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21040561 PMCID: PMC3091753 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Effects of . DCs were examined for the expression of CD40, CD80, CD86, MHC class II and CD11c following [BF/S+L/Ep] for 24 hr by flow-cytometry.
Figure 2Correlation of biological sample replicates. A, DMSO (control) replicates (Affymetrix ID: 579, 580) after 4 h treatment. Pearson correlation value: 0.99735. B, [BF/S+L/Ep] replicates (Affymetrix ID: 581, 582) after 4 h treatment. Pearson correlation value: 0.99303. C, [DMSO] (control) replicates (Affymetrix ID: 583, 584) after 12 h treatment. Pearson correlation value: 0.99628. D, [BF/S+L/Ep] replicates (Affymetrix ID: 585, 586) after 12 h treatment. Pearson correlation value: 0.99631. Data analysis used Spotfire software. Pearson correlation value and number of unchanged transcripts were calculated using GCOS software.
Changes in gene expression in BMDCs in response to treatment with [BF/S+L/Ep]
| Expression change relative to DMSO alone | Up-regulated genes | Down-regulated genes | Total number of regulated genes | Percentage of all genes (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significant a | 513 | 472 | 985 | 2.90 | |
| ≥ 1.5 | 104 | 94 | 198 | 0.58 | |
| ≥ 2 b | 19 | 10 | 29 | 0.09 | |
| ≥ 3 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.03 | |
| ≥ 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.01 | |
| Significant a | 89 | 83 | 172 | 0.51 | |
| ≥ 1.5 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 0.09 | |
| ≥ 2 c | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.01 | |
| ≥ 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.01 | |
| ≥ 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| ≥ 2 b-c | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0.07 | |
| Significant a | 605 | 736 | 1341 | 3.94 | |
| ≥ 1.5 | 128 | 132 | 260 | 0.76 | |
| ≥ 2 d | 21 | 18 | 39 | 0.11 | |
| ≥ 3 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.03 | |
| ≥ 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.02 | |
| Significant a | 144 | 120 | 264 | 0.78 | |
| ≥ 1.5 | 27 | 19 | 46 | 0.14 | |
| ≥ 2 e | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.01 | |
| ≥ 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| ≥ 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| ≥ 2 d-e | 19 | 18 | 37 | 0.11 |
a Differentially expressed genes that are significant in [BF/S+L/Ep] vs. [DMSO] (control). Values of p ≤ 0.05 are considered to be significant. All relative differences greater than 1.5 are significant.
b Up-regulated genes with at least a 2-fold change in the level of RNA transcript expression after 4 h treatment
c Up-regulated immune-related genes with at least a 2-fold change after 4 h treatment
d Down-regulated genes with at least a 2-fold change in the level of RNA transcript expression after 4 h treatment
e Down-regulated immune-related genes with at least a 2-fold change after 12 h treatment
Up-regulation of genes in iBMDCs treated with [BF/S+L/Ep] for (A) 4 h or (B) 12 h compared to DMSO alone
| Gene Name | Accession Number | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| | |||
| Ncam2 | neural cell adhesion molecule 2 | NM_010954 | 6.57 |
| Serpinb2 | serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade B, member 2 | NM_011111 | 4.50 |
| Ikbkg | inhibitor of kappa B kinase gamma | NM_010547 | 2.03 |
| | |||
| Amot | angiomotin | NM_153319 | 2.48 |
| Cxcl5 | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 | NM_009141 | 8.63 |
| Irg1 | immunoresponsive gene 1 | XM_127883 | 2.17 |
| Cxcl7 | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 7 | NM_023785 | 2.08 |
| | |||
| Nrxn1 | neurexin I | Q9CS84 | 9.62 |
| Sorbs1 | sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1 | NM_009166 | 3.70 |
| Ahrr | aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor | NM_009644 | 2.37 |
| Abce1 | ATP-binding cassette, sub-family E (OABP), member 1 | NM_015751 | 2.10 |
| | |||
| Cyr61 | cysteine rich protein 61 | NM_010516 | 6.60 |
| Mtap9 | microtubule-associated protein 9 | Q3TRR0 | 2.64 |
| | |||
| Ppfia1 | protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, f polypeptide (PTPRF) | XM_133979 | 2.74 |
| | |||
| Wdhd1 | WD-repeat HMG-box DNA binding protein 1 | NM_172598 | 2.04 |
| | |||
| Prdm10 | PR domain containing 10 | Q3UTQ7 | 6.98 |
| Tdrd3 | Tudor domain containing 3 | NM_172605 | 3.48 |
| Mif4gd | MIF4G domain containing | NM_027162 | 2.16 |
| Dnahc2 | dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 2 | O08826 | 2.09 |
| | |||
| Serpinb2 | serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade B, member 2 | NM_011111 | 3.34 |
| Cspg2 | chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2 | NM_019389 | 2.20 |
| Mmp8 | matrix metallopeptidase 8 | NM_008611 | 2.18 |
| Myo1d | Myosin ID | NM_177390 | 2.07 |
| | |||
| Phip | pleckstrin homology domain interacting protein | Q32NY1 | 3.28 |
| Cd38 | CD38 antigen | NM_007646 | 2.51 |
| Rbp1 | retinol binding protein 1, cellular | NM_011254 | 2.28 |
| Ap3s2 | adaptor-related protein complex 3, sigma 2 subunit | NM_009682 | 2.12 |
| Golph4 | golgi phosphoprotein 4 | NM_175193 | 2.03 |
| | |||
| Dnm1l | dynamin 1-like | NM_152816 | 13.11 |
| Wdfy3 | WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3 | NM_172882 | 4.64 |
| Acpp | acid phosphatase, prostate | NM_019807 | 2.18 |
| Apc | adenomatosis polyposis coli | NM_007462 | 2.15 |
| Adhfe1 | alcohol dehydrogenase, iron containing, 1 | NM_175236 | 2.04 |
| | |||
| Ctla4 | cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 | NM_009843 | 11.16 |
| Cxcl7 | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 7 | NM_023785 | 2.77 |
| | |||
| Mrps5 | mitochondrial ribosomal protein S5 | NM_029963 | 2.20 |
| Sf4 | splicing factor 4 | NM_027481 | 2.45 |
| | |||
| Asb2 | ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 2 | NM_023049 | 2.75 |
| | |||
| Dnahc2 | dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 2 | O08826 | 3.11 |
| Ccdc89 | coiled-coil domain containing 89 | Q9DA73 | 2.01 |
a Expression ratio is defined as relative difference in expression with (+) compared to without (-) treatment with [BF/S+L/Ep] plant extract; (-) is DMSO vehicle control.
Down-regulation of genes in iBMDCs treated with [BF/S+L/Ep] for (A) 4 h or (B) 12 h compared to DMSO alone
| Gene Title | Accession Number | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| | |||
| Cnn3 | calponin 3, acidic | NM_028044 | 0.13 |
| Cdh10 | cadherin 10 | Q3UUB3 | 0.27 |
| Itga6 | Integrin alpha 6 | NM_008397 | 0.50 |
| | |||
| Sycp1 | synaptonemal complex protein 1 | NM_011516 | 0.25 |
| | |||
| Atad1 | ATPase family, AAA domain containing 1 | NM_026487 | 0.48 |
| St8sia6 | ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8- | NM_145838 | 0.45 |
| Prkce | Protein kinase C, epsilon | NM_011104 | 0.47 |
| | |||
| Shprh | SNF2 histone linker PHD RING helicase | NM_172937 | 0.27 |
| Zfp39 | zinc finger protein 39 | NM_011758 | 0.31 |
| | |||
| Cep110 | centrosomal protein 110 | XM_981952 | 0.46 |
| | |||
| Cdh1 | Cadherin 1 | NM_009864 | 0.30 |
| Gja1 | gap junction membrane channel protein alpha 1 | NM_010288 | 0.48 |
| | |||
| Rab17 | RAB17, member RAS oncogene family | NM_008998 | 0.42 |
| Oscar | osteoclast associated receptor | NM_175632 | 0.44 |
| Kcne3 | Voltage-gated potassium channel, Isk-related subfamily, gene 3 | NM_020574 | 0.49 |
| Sla | src-like adaptor | NM_009192 | 0.50 |
| | |||
| Setd4 | SET domain containing 4 | NM_145482 | 0.32 |
| Ndufb2 | NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex, 2 | NM_026612 | 0.39 |
| Acss1 | acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 1 | NM_080575 | 0.40 |
| | |||
| Sox6 | SRY-box containing gene 6 | NM_011445 | 0.06 |
| Dmc1h | disrupted meiotic cDNA 1 homolog | NM_010059 | 0.17 |
| Nfxl1 | nuclear transcription factor, X-box binding-like 1 | Q3ULV1 | 0.36 |
| Huwe1 | HECT, UBA and WWE domain containing 1 | NM_021523 | 0.41 |
| | |||
| Fbxo36 | F-box only protein 36 | NM_025386 | 0.46 |
| | |||
| Rbm14 | RNA binding motif protein 14 | NM_019869 | 0.50 |
| | |||
| Speer4b | spermatogenesis associated glutamate (E)-rich protein 4b | NM_028561 | 0.19 |
| Ccdc21 | coiled-coil domain containing 21 | NM_144527 | 0.47 |
| Mgl1 | macrophage galactose N-acetyl-galactosamine specific lectin 1 | NM_010796 | 0.48 |
a Expression ratio is defined as relative difference in expression with (+) compared to without (-) treatment with [BF/S+L/Ep] plant extract; (-) is DMSO vehicle control.
Figure 3Pathway analysis of representative genes that responded to [BF/S+L/Ep] treatment. A prototypical cell was constructed from 37 representative genes that responded to treatment with [BF/S+L/Ep] in vitro from 4 h to 12 h. A, Genes whose expression was up-regulated (more than doubled) are colored red, and those whose expression was down-regulated (to less than half) are shown in green. Selected regions of the network highlight several groups of genes. Group 1, Immune response related genes. Group 2, Adhesion molecules and cytoskeleton; cell movement related genes. Group 3, Cell cycle, cell proliferation and apoptosis related genes. Gene networks were analyzed with the Ingenuity Pathways program. B, The TRANSPATH Professional 7.1 database was searched to assess possible signaling pathways, networks or potential interactions among the responsive genes/target molecules in DCs treated with [BF/S+L/Ep]. The 37 genes that were up- or down-regulated at least 2-fold compared to controls were analyzed. Specifically, connections (hits) within 7 genes were employed as the parameter for the current search. Five postulated key molecules/pathways; JNK2 (c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 2), PP2C-α (protein phosphatase 2C-alpha), AKT (protein kinase B), ERK (extracellular signal-related kinase) and MAPKAPK (MAPK-activated protein kinase 2) that may be activated by [BF/S+L/Ep] treatment are predicted with arrows. The green rhombuses indicate the upstream transcription factors of responsive genes.
Differentially expressed proteins identified by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS analysis of 2D gel protein profiles of iBMDCs treated with [BF/S+L/Ep] (75 ug/mL) in vitro for 12 h
| Spot Number | Protein Name | SwissProt Accession Number | Biological Function | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | Annexin A4 | 1.73 | Signal transduction; cell communication | |
| 34 | Peroxiredoxin 4 | 1.56 | Metabolism; Energy pathways | |
| 82 | Vimentin | 1.13 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 26 | Alpha-actin-2 | 1.12 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 23 | Proliferin-1 | 1.1 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 98 | APAF1-interacting protein | 1.09 | apoptosis | |
| 1 | beta-actin | 1.05 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 58 | Alpha-tubulin 1, 2, 4, 6 | 1.04 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 79 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | 1.04 | Protein metabolism | |
| 109 | Solute carrier family 35 member E1 | 1.04 | Transport | |
| 55 | Actin, cytoplasmic 1 (Beta-actin) | 1.03 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 88 | YEATS domain-containing protein 4 | 0.96 | Regulation of nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism | |
| 6 | Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase | 0.92 | Protein metabolism | |
| 41 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 [Precursor] | 0.92 | Protein metabolism | |
| 38 | Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 | 0.87 | Metabolism; Energy pathways | |
| 78 | Heat shock protein 9, [Precursor] | 0.84 | Protein metabolism | |
| 56 | F-actin capping protein alpha subunit | 0.83 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 13 | Cathepsin S | 0.81 | Protein metabolism | |
| 91 | Nucleoside diphosphate kinase | 0.74 | Metabolism; Energy pathways | |
| 70 | Alpha-enolase | 0.73 | Metabolism; Energy pathways | |
| 45 | Macrophage capping protein | 0.63 | Cell growth/maintenance | |
| 192 | Voltage-gated potassium channel subfamily KQT member 2 | 0.46 | Transport | |
| 191 | Protein tyrosine phosphatase mitochondrial 1 | 0.34 | signal transduction; cell communication |
a Relative protein level with or without [BF/S+L/Ep] (75 μg/mL), 0.1% DMSO as vehicle control.
Figure 4Proteomics analyses of . Effect of Echinacea purpurea extract on differential protein expression in iBMDCs was evaluated by 2D gel electrophoretic analysis. 500 μg of total cell proteins from various treatments of iBMDCs were applied to pH 5-8 IPG strips. After isofocusing and 2D gel separation, SYPRO Ruby was used to stain proteins. Images on gel were analyzed using PD-Quest software. Forty-two differentially-expressed proteins were trypsin-digested in situ, and 23 protein spots were identified by MALDI-TOF MS, with their locations in gel assigned a number. These protein ID numbers are listed in Table 4. A, Up-regulated and B, down-regulated protein spots are reported on a representative two-dimensional gel corresponding to protein expression profile of iBMDCs. The expression ratios are shown in bold print. Gels shown here are representative of thee independent experiments.
Figure 5Effects of [BF/S+L/Ep] treatment on the trafficking activity of DCs. A, Two million BMDCs treated with DMSO (a-c), [BF/S+L/Ep] (d-f) and LPS (g-i) were labeled with green fluorescence dye and injected into allogeneic mice. Tissues of control BALB/c mice which were injected with DCs without fluorescence dye staining did not show significant green fluorescence spots, while the auto-fluorescence background was rather low (j-l). After 24 h mice were sacrificed and DC mobility compared by detecting DCs with green fluorescence in peripheral lymph nodes (a, d, g and j), spleen (b, e, h and k) and liver (c, f, I and l). Insets (d, e, g and h) show digitally amplified magnifications of treated DCs exhibiting different cellular behaviors in tissue trafficking and different levels in fluorescent intensity. Samples of liver tissue were detected as negative for fluorescence staining of DCs throughout the observation period.
Figure 6Effect of [BF/S+L/Ep] treatment (24 h) on the expression of CCR4, CCR5 and CCR7 proteins in BMDCs treated with or without LPS stimulation. CCR5 and CCR7 are expressed as cell surface markers on DC at distinct differentiation stages and are known to play important roles in DC mobility. CCR4+CCR5+ and CCR4+CCR7+ cells are considered as immature and mature DC populations, respectively. Populations of them were compared by flow cytometry analysis.