OBJECTIVE: Data documenting the functional impairment associated with the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in children and adolescents highlight the need for greater understanding of its pathophysiology. Toward that end, we demonstrated previously that BD youth have behavioral deficits on reversal learning tasks. On such tasks, participants must first acquire a stimulus/response relationship through trial-and-error learning, and then discern when the stimulus/reward relationship reverses. Here, we use event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate neural correlates of reversal learning deficits in euthymic BD youth compared to typically developing controls. METHOD: We compared euthymic pediatric BD participants (n = 16) versus age-, sex-, and IQ-matched controls (n = 16). Our main outcome measure was blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal measured with fMRI during an event-related probabilistic reversal task. RESULTS: Pediatric BD participants had significantly greater neural activity than controls in fronto-parietal regions during the reversal phase, particularly in response to punished reversal errors (p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Our current study suggests that during reversal learning, BD youths inefficiently recruit regions associated with processing response conflict and implementing alternative responses, including subdivisions of the frontal cortex and the parietal cortex. Such deficits are present in euthymic BD youth. Further work is necessary to evaluate the specificity of such alterations.
OBJECTIVE: Data documenting the functional impairment associated with the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in children and adolescents highlight the need for greater understanding of its pathophysiology. Toward that end, we demonstrated previously that BD youth have behavioral deficits on reversal learning tasks. On such tasks, participants must first acquire a stimulus/response relationship through trial-and-error learning, and then discern when the stimulus/reward relationship reverses. Here, we use event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate neural correlates of reversal learning deficits in euthymic BD youth compared to typically developing controls. METHOD: We compared euthymic pediatric BD participants (n = 16) versus age-, sex-, and IQ-matched controls (n = 16). Our main outcome measure was blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal measured with fMRI during an event-related probabilistic reversal task. RESULTS: Pediatric BD participants had significantly greater neural activity than controls in fronto-parietal regions during the reversal phase, particularly in response to punished reversal errors (p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Our current study suggests that during reversal learning, BD youths inefficiently recruit regions associated with processing response conflict and implementing alternative responses, including subdivisions of the frontal cortex and the parietal cortex. Such deficits are present in euthymic BD youth. Further work is necessary to evaluate the specificity of such alterations.
Authors: Brendan A Rich; Mariana Schmajuk; Koraly E Perez-Edgar; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; Marjorie Garvey; Anne G Pradella; Deanna K Greenstein; Wendy S Sharp; F Xavier Castellanos; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Elizabeth C Finger; Abigail A Marsh; Derek G Mitchell; Marguerite E Reid; Courtney Sims; Salima Budhani; David S Kosson; Gang Chen; Kenneth E Towbin; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; James R Blair Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-05
Authors: Fabiano G Nery; Hua-Hsuan Chen; John P Hatch; Mark A Nicoletti; Paolo Brambilla; Roberto B Sassi; Alan G Mallinger; Matcheri S Keshavan; Jair C Soares Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: D P Dickstein; E C Finger; M A Brotman; B A Rich; D S Pine; J R Blair; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Pilyoung Kim; Sarah E Jenkins; Megan E Connolly; Christen M Deveney; Stephen J Fromm; Melissa A Brotman; Eric E Nelson; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2011-10-22 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; James M Gold; Sheri L Johnson; Ann M Kring; Angus W MacDonald; Diego A Pizzagalli; J Daniel Ragland; Steven M Silverstein; Milton E Strauss Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2017-04-13
Authors: Matthew E Young; Thania Galvan; Brooke L Reidy; Matthew F Pescosolido; Kerri L Kim; Karen Seymour; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Xian-Feng Shi; Douglas G Kondo; Young-Hoon Sung; Tracy L Hellem; Kristen K Fiedler; Eun-Kee Jeong; Rebekah S Huber; Perry F Renshaw Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Ryan P Cabeen; David H Laidlaw; Amanda Ruggieri; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; David Axelson; Alexandra B Weissman; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey I Hunt; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Heather Hower; Thomas W Frazier; Rasim S Diler; Eric A Youngstrom; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Robert L Findling; Sarah M Horwitz; Robert A Kowatch; Neal D Ryan; Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher; Martin B Keller Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Amanda K Hinze; Lisa Bonar; Jorge R C Almeida; Susan B Perlman; Amelia Versace; Claudiu Schirda; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Christine Demeter; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Gary Ciuffetelli; Eric Rodriguez; Thomas Olino; Erika Forbes; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Mary L Phillips Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 21.596