Literature DB >> 21039845

An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia.

Philip B Morgan1, Nathan Efron, Craig A Woods.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to determine world-wide patterns of fitting contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia.
METHODS: Up to 1,000 survey forms were sent to contact lens fitters in each of 38 countries between January and March every year over five consecutive years (2005 to 2009). Practitioners were asked to record data relating to the first 10 contact lens fittings or refittings performed after receiving the survey form.
RESULTS: Data were received relating to 16,680 presbyopic (age 45 years or older) and 84,202 pre-presbyopic (15 to 44 years) contact lens wearers. Females are over-represented in presbyopic versus pre-presbyopic groups, possibly reflecting a stronger desire for the cosmetic benefits of contact lenses among older women. The extent to which multifocal and monovision lenses are prescribed for presbyopes varies considerably among nations, ranging from 79 per cent of all soft lenses in Portugal to zero in Singapore. There appears to be significant under-prescribing of contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia, although for those who do receive such corrections, three times more multifocal lenses are fitted compared with monovision fittings. Presbyopic corrections are most frequently prescribed for full-time wear and monthly replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite apparent improvements in multifocal design and an increase in available multifocal options in recent years, practitioners are still under-prescribing with respect to the provision of appropriate contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia. Training of contact lens practitioners in presbyopic contact lens fitting should be accelerated and clinical and laboratory research in this field should be intensified to enhance the prospects of meeting the needs of presbyopic contact lens wearers more fully.
© 2010 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2010 Optometrists Association Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039845     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00524.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  11 in total

1.  Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; David Madrid-Costa; Alejandro Cerviño-Expósito
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Barriers, motivators and enablers for dispensing multifocal contact lenses in Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Nilesh Thite; Ukti Shah; Jasmin Mehta; Janice Jurkus
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-01-04

3.  Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision.

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Marika Berchicci; Shehzad A Naroo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Impact of contact lens zone geometry and ocular optics on bifocal retinal image quality.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Jayoung Nam; Renfeng Xu; Leslie Harman; Larry Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.

Authors:  Daniel Tilia; Anna Munro; Jiyoon Chung; Jennifer Sha; Shona Delaney; Danny Kho; Varghese Thomas; Klaus Ehrmann; Ravi Chandra Bakaraju
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-05-07

6.  Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 2. Visual performance after 1 week of lens wear.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Daniel Tilia; Jennifer Sha; Jennie Diec; Jiyoon Chung; Danny Kho; Shona Delaney; Anna Munro; Varghese Thomas
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Microbiota and Particulate Matter Assessment in Portuguese Optical Shops Providing Contact Lens Services.

Authors:  Carla Viegas; Tiago Faria; Cátia Pacífico; Mateus Dos Santos; Ana Monteiro; Carla Lança; Elisabete Carolino; Susana Viegas; Sandra Cabo Verde
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-15

8.  Comparing spectacle and toric contact lens prescribing trends for astigmatism.

Authors:  Byoung Sun Chu; Mei Ying Boon; Dong Hwan Noh
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2018-11-08

Review 9.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes.

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Shehzad A Naroo; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.