Literature DB >> 21039328

Psychosocial stress during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a meta-analytic review.

Heather L Littleton1, Kimberly Bye, Katie Buck, Amanda Amacker.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between psychosocial stress in pregnancy and negative perinatal outcomes and to identify key moderators of this relationship. To evaluate this relationship, a meta-analytic review was conducted of studies that prospectively assessed the relationship between psychosocial stress in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. A total of 35 studies, written or published between 1991 and 2009, involving 31,323 women were located. The overall association between psychosocial stress and negative perinatal outcomes was significant, but negligibly small in size (r (35) = -0.04, CI = -0.08, -0.01). Examining specific perinatal outcomes, only the associations with neonatal weight (r (14) = -0.07, CI = -0.03, -0.01) and risk for low birth weight (r (5) = 0.07, CI = 0.03, 0.10) were statistically significant, but again, very small. Results support that psychosocial stress explains a negligible to very small amount of the variability in perinatal outcomes. Future research should focus on identifying other psychosocial and lifestyle variables that alone or in interaction with other factors explain larger amounts of the variability in perinatal outcomes. Future research should also examine whether psychosocial stress increases risk for negative outcomes in combination with other biomedical and psychosocial risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039328     DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2010.518776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  40 in total

1.  Results of a Needs Assessment to Guide the Development of a Website to Enhance Emotional Wellness and Healthy Behaviors During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Deborah Da Costa; Phyllis Zelkowitz; Kristen Bailey; Rani Cruz; Jean-Christophe Bernard; Kaberi Dasgupta; Ilka Lowensteyn; Samir Khalifé
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

2.  Disparate patterns of prenatal care utilization stratified by medical and psychosocial risk.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Matthew M Davis; Christie L Palladino
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-05

3.  Does low birth weight share common genetic or environmental risk with childhood disruptive disorders?

Authors:  Courtney A Ficks; Benjamin B Lahey; Irwin D Waldman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-07-08

4.  Smoking and perceived stress in relation to short salivary telomere length among caregivers of children with disabilities.

Authors:  Xiaoli Chen; Juan Carlos Velez; Clarita Barbosa; Micah Pepper; Asterio Andrade; Lee Stoner; Immaculata De Vivo; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.493

5.  Paternal involvement and support and risk of preterm birth: findings from the Boston birth cohort.

Authors:  Pamela J Surkan; Liming Dong; Yuelong Ji; Xiumei Hong; Hongkai Ji; Mary Kimmel; Wan-Yee Tang; Xiaobin Wang
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.949

6.  The Role of Placental 11-Beta Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 and Type 2 Methylation on Gene Expression and Infant Birth Weight.

Authors:  Benjamin B Green; David A Armstrong; Corina Lesseur; Alison G Paquette; Dylan J Guerin; Lauren E Kwan; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Maternal Stress Before Conception Is Associated with Shorter Gestation.

Authors:  N E Mahrer; C M Guardino; C Hobel; C Dunkel Schetter
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-20

8.  Selection against small males in utero: a test of the Wells hypothesis.

Authors:  R Catalano; J Goodman; C E Margerison-Zilko; K B Saxton; E Anderson; M Epstein
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Allostatic load in women with a history of low birth weight infants: the national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Vanessa J Hux; Janet M Catov; James M Roberts
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Impact of psychosocial risk factors on prenatal care delivery: a national provider survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Nicholas M Moloci; Michelle T Housey; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.