Literature DB >> 21038279

Gradients of semantic relatedness and their contrasting explanations in refractory access and storage semantic impairments.

Sebastian J Crutch1, Elizabeth K Warrington.   

Abstract

We report a study that directly compares the comprehension skills of patients with refractory access and static storage semantic deficits. It has been reported previously, in the context of matching to sample tasks, that the performance of both types of patients may be affected by the semantic relatedness of competing responses. However, it has been hypothesised that such effects of semantic distance may reflect different processes (Warrington & Cipolotti, 1996). More specifically, semantic relatedness effects following refractory access deficits may be explained in terms of the effect of refractoriness on representations that share semantic space, whilst relatedness effects consequent to storage deficits may reflect the preferential sparing of superordinate rather than item-specific information. In this series of experiments, we compare and contrast refractory access and storage patients on word-picture matching tasks that manipulate the semantic relatedness of items within a response array. In particular, the interaction of semantic distance and item frequency is explored. We also provide evidence of gradients of semantic relatedness in our refractory assess patient, and consider what information such patients can provide about extremely fine-grain conceptual organisation.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 21038279     DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  What we talk about when we talk about access deficits.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Deficits of knowledge versus executive control in semantic cognition: insights from cued naming.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jefferies; Karalyn Patterson; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Left frontotemporal effective connectivity during semantic feature judgments in patients with chronic aphasia and age-matched healthy controls.

Authors:  Erin L Meier; Jeffrey P Johnson; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Different Loci of Semantic Interference in Picture Naming vs. Word-Picture Matching Tasks.

Authors:  Denise Y Harvey; Tatiana T Schnur
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-13

5.  Overlapping connectivity patterns during semantic processing of abstract and concrete words revealed with multivariate Granger Causality analysis.

Authors:  Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee; Elvira Khachatryan; Sahar Chehrazad; Ana Kotarcic; Miet De Letter; Marc M Van Hulle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia: Theoretical and practical implications.

Authors:  Kyriaki Neophytou; Robert W Wiley; Brenda Rapp; Kyrana Tsapkini
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Cognitive and anatomical underpinnings of the conceptual knowledge for common objects and familiar people: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Franco Fabbro; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.