Literature DB >> 17961610

Deficits of knowledge versus executive control in semantic cognition: insights from cued naming.

Elizabeth Jefferies1, Karalyn Patterson, Matthew A Lambon Ralph.   

Abstract

Deficits of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and in aphasia consequent on CVA (stroke) are qualitatively different. Patients with semantic dementia are characterised by progressive degradation of central semantic representations, whereas multimodal semantic deficits in stroke aphasia reflect impairment of executive processes that help to direct and control semantic activation in a task-appropriate fashion [Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia vs. semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain 129, 2132-2147]. We explored interactions between these two aspects of semantic cognition by examining the effects of cumulative phonemic cueing on picture naming in case series of these two types of patient. The stroke aphasic patients with multimodal semantic deficits cued very readily and demonstrated near-perfect name retrieval when cumulative phonemic cues reached or exceeded the target name's uniqueness point. Therefore, knowledge of the picture names was largely intact for the aphasic patients, but they were unable to retrieve this information without cues that helped to direct activation towards the target response. Equivalent phonemic cues engendered significant but much more limited benefit to the semantic dementia patients: their naming was still severely impaired even when most of the word had been provided. In contrast to the pattern in the stroke aphasia group, successful cueing was mainly confined to the more familiar un-named pictures. We propose that this limited cueing effect in semantic dementia follows from the fact that concepts deteriorate in a graded fashion [Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., & Hodges, J. R., et al. (2004). The structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review 111, 205-235]. For partially degraded items, the residual conceptual knowledge may be insufficient to drive speech production to completion but these items might reach threshold when they are bolstered by cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17961610      PMCID: PMC2350189          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  39 in total

1.  Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval.

Authors:  A D Wagner; E J Paré-Blagoev; J Clark; R A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks.

Authors:  Brian T Gold; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval.

Authors:  H Damasio; D Tranel; T Grabowski; R Adolphs; A Damasio
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  Gradients of semantic relatedness and their contrasting explanations in refractory access and storage semantic impairments.

Authors:  Sebastian J Crutch; Elizabeth K Warrington
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes.

Authors:  D T Stuss; B Levine; M P Alexander; J Hong; C Palumbo; L Hamer; K J Murphy; D Izukawa
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity.

Authors:  J B Demb; J E Desmond; A D Wagner; C J Vaidya; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Effect of auditory prestimulation on naming in aphasia.

Authors:  B L Podraza; F L Darley
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-12

9.  No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: neuropsychological evidence and a computational model.

Authors:  M A Lambon Ralph; J L McClelland; K Patterson; C J Galton; J R Hodges
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Attentional functions of parietal and frontal cortex.

Authors:  Polly V Peers; Casimir J H Ludwig; Chris Rorden; Rhodri Cusack; Claudia Bonfiglioli; Claus Bundesen; Jon Driver; Nagui Antoun; John Duncan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  What we talk about when we talk about access deficits.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The impact of semantic impairment on verbal short-term memory in stroke aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jefferies; Paul Hoffman; Roy Jones; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Eiling Yee; Sheila E Blumstein; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Object identification leads to a conceptual broadening of object representations in lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; Shawn C Milleville; Alex Martin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Impairment of homonymous processing in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Massimo Piccirilli; Patrizia D'Alessandro; Norma Micheletti; Sara Macone; Laura Scarponi; Paola Arcelli; Stefania Maria Petrillo; Mauro Silvestrini; Simona Luzzi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Lexicality Effects in Word and Nonword Recall of Semantic Dementia and Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia.

Authors:  Jamie Reilly; Joshua Troche; Alison Chatel; Hyejin Park; Michelene Kalinyak-Fliszar; Sharon M Antonucci; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Lexical access in semantic variant PPA: Evidence for a post-semantic contribution to naming deficits.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Charlotte Dehollain; Sophie Ferrieux; Laura E H Christensen; Marc Teichmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Investigating the origin of nonfluency in aphasia: A path modeling approach to neuropsychology.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  The neural correlates of naming and fluency deficits in Alzheimer's disease: an FDG-PET study.

Authors:  Rebecca J Melrose; Olivia M Campa; Dylan G Harwood; Sheryl Osato; Mark A Mandelkern; David L Sultzer
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.